Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Java Iceberg ships a filesystem-only HadoopCatalog / HadoopTables, where table metadata lives under <warehouse>/<db>.db/<table>/metadata/ with no external metastore. PyIceberg currently has no equivalent — the available catalog types are rest / hive / glue / dynamodb / sql / in-memory / bigquery.
This gap matters in two ways:
-
Interop with Java-side HadoopCatalog tables. Tables created by Java HadoopCatalog (common in lightweight deployments without a metastore) cannot be opened through any supported PyIceberg catalog. Users must fall back to StaticTable.from_metadata and resolve the latest metadata.json themselves, which loses catalog semantics (no namespace listing, no create/commit).
-
Downstream projects already assume the module exists. Daft's Gravitino integration imports from pyiceberg.catalog.hadoop import HadoopCatalog and calls HadoopCatalog("gravitino_reader", props).load_table(table_dir) to open a table from a storage location (daft/catalog/__gravitino/_catalog.py). Against PyIceberg 0.11.x this raises TypeError: HadoopCatalog.__init__() takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given, and against versions without the module it fails at import time.
Describe the solution you'd like
A pyiceberg.catalog.hadoop.HadoopCatalog (subclassing MetastoreCatalog) implementing Java HadoopCatalog semantics:
warehouse property as the root location
- table dir =
<warehouse>/<namespace>/<table>
- metadata at
<table_dir>/metadata/v{n}.metadata.json plus a version-hint.text holding the current version
- latest-version resolution: read
version-hint.text, fall back to scanning metadata/ for the max v{n} (matching Java behavior)
- namespace/table create/list/commit driven purely by the warehouse filesystem (no metastore calls)
Additional context / pitfalls observed while prototyping
Happy to contribute a PR if this is in scope. A few notes from an internal prototype:
-
Metadata file naming. Java HadoopCatalog uses v{n}.metadata.json + version-hint.text, but tables created by JDBC/REST catalogs use 00000-<uuid>.metadata.json with no version-hint. To open those as well, the scan fallback should accept both patterns (v(\d+)\.metadata\.json and \d{5}-.*\.metadata\.json), or at least document the limitation.
-
Filesystem abstraction. __init__ should derive the filesystem from the catalog's FileIO (PyArrowFileIO) instead of hardcoding pyarrow.fs.HadoopFileSystem.from_uri(warehouse). The JVM-backed HadoopFileSystem only supports hdfs:// and fails for object-store schemes (s3://, and custom schemes), so routing through FileIO keeps it scheme-agnostic.
-
Atomicity. create_table / commit_table use create-if-absent on v{n}.metadata.json for optimistic concurrency — safe on HDFS but not atomic on plain object stores (S3 has no create-if-absent guarantee). Java has the same caveat; worth documenting or using a conditional-write primitive where available.
Adapting a custom storage scheme (Tencent Cloud TBDSFS as a concrete case)
A related gap surfaced while prototyping against Tencent Cloud TBDS's distributed filesystem scheme tbdsfs://<cluster>/<path> (exposed by a Python client, plus a JVM fs.tbdsfs.impl):
-
PyArrowFileIO._initialize_fs(scheme, netloc) only understands a fixed set of schemes (hdfs / s3 / gs / file / abfs / ...), so any tbdsfs://... location raises ValueError: Unrecognized filesystem type in URI: tbdsfs.
-
There is no public, documented way to plug in a custom filesystem. The only workaround today is monkey-patching a private method:
- Implement a
pyarrow.fs.FileSystemHandler subclass wrapping the TBDSFS Python client, wrap it in pyarrow.fs.PyFileSystem, then patch PyArrowFileIO._initialize_fs to return that filesystem when scheme == "tbdsfs".
- pyarrow 21's
PyFileSystem callback also has non-obvious contracts any custom handler must satisfy: single paths arrive as one-element lists; get_file_info must return a one-element list; and for scheme'd URIs the netloc is prepended into the path (e.g. internal/usr/..., without a leading slash).
This works, but it depends on patching a private API (_initialize_fs), which is brittle across PyIceberg releases.
Suggested improvement: a documented, public extension point for registering an arbitrary pyarrow.fs.FileSystem (or a custom FileIO) per scheme — e.g. a register_file_system(scheme, factory) helper, or a scheme → FileSystem mapping read from FileIO/catalog properties — so non-standard object stores and filesystems can be integrated without touching internals. This would also naturally address the HadoopCatalog.__init__ filesystem-abstraction point above.
References
- Java:
org.apache.iceberg.hadoop.HadoopCatalog / HadoopTables
- Downstream usage that currently breaks:
daft/catalog/__gravitino/_catalog.py → _open_iceberg_table
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Java Iceberg ships a filesystem-only
HadoopCatalog/HadoopTables, where table metadata lives under<warehouse>/<db>.db/<table>/metadata/with no external metastore. PyIceberg currently has no equivalent — the available catalog types arerest / hive / glue / dynamodb / sql / in-memory / bigquery.This gap matters in two ways:
Interop with Java-side HadoopCatalog tables. Tables created by Java
HadoopCatalog(common in lightweight deployments without a metastore) cannot be opened through any supported PyIceberg catalog. Users must fall back toStaticTable.from_metadataand resolve the latestmetadata.jsonthemselves, which loses catalog semantics (no namespace listing, no create/commit).Downstream projects already assume the module exists. Daft's Gravitino integration imports
from pyiceberg.catalog.hadoop import HadoopCatalogand callsHadoopCatalog("gravitino_reader", props).load_table(table_dir)to open a table from a storage location (daft/catalog/__gravitino/_catalog.py). Against PyIceberg 0.11.x this raisesTypeError: HadoopCatalog.__init__() takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given, and against versions without the module it fails at import time.Describe the solution you'd like
A
pyiceberg.catalog.hadoop.HadoopCatalog(subclassingMetastoreCatalog) implementing Java HadoopCatalog semantics:warehouseproperty as the root location<warehouse>/<namespace>/<table><table_dir>/metadata/v{n}.metadata.jsonplus aversion-hint.textholding the current versionversion-hint.text, fall back to scanningmetadata/for the maxv{n}(matching Java behavior)Additional context / pitfalls observed while prototyping
Happy to contribute a PR if this is in scope. A few notes from an internal prototype:
Metadata file naming. Java HadoopCatalog uses
v{n}.metadata.json+version-hint.text, but tables created by JDBC/REST catalogs use00000-<uuid>.metadata.jsonwith no version-hint. To open those as well, the scan fallback should accept both patterns (v(\d+)\.metadata\.jsonand\d{5}-.*\.metadata\.json), or at least document the limitation.Filesystem abstraction.
__init__should derive the filesystem from the catalog's FileIO (PyArrowFileIO) instead of hardcodingpyarrow.fs.HadoopFileSystem.from_uri(warehouse). The JVM-backedHadoopFileSystemonly supportshdfs://and fails for object-store schemes (s3://, and custom schemes), so routing through FileIO keeps it scheme-agnostic.Atomicity.
create_table/commit_tableuse create-if-absent onv{n}.metadata.jsonfor optimistic concurrency — safe on HDFS but not atomic on plain object stores (S3 has no create-if-absent guarantee). Java has the same caveat; worth documenting or using a conditional-write primitive where available.Adapting a custom storage scheme (Tencent Cloud TBDSFS as a concrete case)
A related gap surfaced while prototyping against Tencent Cloud TBDS's distributed filesystem scheme
tbdsfs://<cluster>/<path>(exposed by a Python client, plus a JVMfs.tbdsfs.impl):PyArrowFileIO._initialize_fs(scheme, netloc)only understands a fixed set of schemes (hdfs / s3 / gs / file / abfs / ...), so anytbdsfs://...location raisesValueError: Unrecognized filesystem type in URI: tbdsfs.There is no public, documented way to plug in a custom filesystem. The only workaround today is monkey-patching a private method:
pyarrow.fs.FileSystemHandlersubclass wrapping the TBDSFS Python client, wrap it inpyarrow.fs.PyFileSystem, then patchPyArrowFileIO._initialize_fsto return that filesystem whenscheme == "tbdsfs".PyFileSystemcallback also has non-obvious contracts any custom handler must satisfy: single paths arrive as one-element lists;get_file_infomust return a one-element list; and for scheme'd URIs the netloc is prepended into the path (e.g.internal/usr/..., without a leading slash).This works, but it depends on patching a private API (
_initialize_fs), which is brittle across PyIceberg releases.Suggested improvement: a documented, public extension point for registering an arbitrary
pyarrow.fs.FileSystem(or a customFileIO) per scheme — e.g. aregister_file_system(scheme, factory)helper, or ascheme → FileSystemmapping read from FileIO/catalog properties — so non-standard object stores and filesystems can be integrated without touching internals. This would also naturally address theHadoopCatalog.__init__filesystem-abstraction point above.References
org.apache.iceberg.hadoop.HadoopCatalog/HadoopTablesdaft/catalog/__gravitino/_catalog.py→_open_iceberg_table