[KeyVault] Fix error message to reference the actual vault name option

[Yeming Liu (isra-fel)]

🤖 PR Validation — ️✔️ All clear

Breaking Changes	Tests
️✔️ None	️✔️ 130/130

Related command
az keyvault purge, az keyvault recover, az keyvault show-deleted, az keyvault show, az keyvault delete, az keyvault create

Description
These commands expose the vault name as --name/-n, but the validators hard-coded --vault-name in their errors, pointing users at a non-existent option:

$ az keyvault purge
ERROR: Please specify --vault-name or --hsm-name.   # before
ERROR: Please specify --name/-n or --hsm-name.      # after

• _validators.py: added _get_vault_name_options(ns), which reads the options_list actually registered for the vault_name argument on the current command and falls back to --vault-name when it can't be resolved.
• validate_vault_name_and_hsm_name and validate_deleted_vault_or_hsm_name build their "please specify" / "mutually exclusive" messages from it, so commands registering --vault-name (e.g. az keyvault private-link-resource) keep the existing wording.
• Added tests/latest/test_validators.py covering the --name/-n, --vault-name, fallback, and success paths.

Testing Guide

az keyvault purge           # Please specify --name/-n or --hsm-name.
az keyvault show-deleted    # Please specify --name/-n or --hsm-name.
az keyvault private-link-resource list -g rg   # Please specify --vault-name or --hsm-name.

History Notes

[Key Vault] az keyvault purge/recover/show-deleted: Fix error message to reference --name/-n instead of the non-existent --vault-name

---

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

• The PR title and description has followed the guideline in Submitting Pull Requests.

• I adhere to the Command Guidelines.

• I adhere to the Error Handling Guidelines.

• Fixes az keyvault purge without arguments gives invalid help output #17923

[Copilot]

🟢 Approval recommended

The focused implementation matches command registration behavior and includes appropriate tests.

0 open findings

What changed in this PR

Fixes Key Vault validation errors to display the command’s actual vault-name options.

Changes:

• Dynamically resolves registered vault-name aliases with a safe fallback.
• Adds validator coverage for aliases, fallback, exclusivity, and success paths.

File	Description
_validators.py	Builds accurate vault/HSM validation messages.
tests/​latest/​test_validators.py	Tests updated validator behavior.

🧠 Review effort: Balanced

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[Yong Zhang (yonzhan)]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

🔔 Routing this PR to @Azure/act-identity-squad.

[x-engineering-agent]

Yeming Liu (@isra-fel)

Review

All 55 upstream checks passed on c32240f60b59. The change is scoped to validator error wording; no request/response fields or service output changed, and no recording update is indicated by this diff.

Scenario coverage to verify

The assertions in src/azure-cli/azure/cli/command_modules/keyvault/tests/latest/test_validators.py exercise registered-option variants, fallback, mutual exclusion and single-name success. They construct their own command metadata, however, rather than invoke the command that reproduces #17923. Passing these tests does not establish that az keyvault purge without arguments emits Please specify --name/-n or --hsm-name. through the real parser and validator chain.

Add a command-level regression to that test file using the repository's command-loading/invocation harness, and verify the exact error before human approval. Cover recover/show-deleted as the description claims, plus a --vault-name command such as private-link-resource list to confirm its wording remains unchanged. Rerun the focused keyvault validator tests and the command-invocation regression; this is deterministic validation and need not contact Azure.

Test validation

• Agent live test: Not run; this is a review-only PR. Check author-provided test evidence and upstream CI separately.
• Regression coverage: For keyvault: 1 focused test file(s) changed. Scenario coverage is unverified; review the issue's required conditions, test setup, and assertions before approval. No linked issue was found in the PR timeline; inspect the source issue and its required scenario manually.

The description references #17923, which was inspected separately: its required scenario is the no-argument purge error, not an ARM operation. Author-provided evidence consists of the changed unit assertions and the testing guide; neither is an Agent live run.

Risk assessment

0/100 · Low · High confidence

The Low rating reflects the detected change scope with no elevated security, reliability, customer, operational, dependency, sovereign-cloud, generated-output, or cross-component signal.

• Change scope: 2 changed files, 80 changed lines (+77 / -3), including 1 production file.
• Affected components: keyvault
• Risk drivers: No elevated risk signal was detected.
• Regression evidence: Changed regression tests are included, reducing risk.
• Confidence: High because changed-line patches were available for every production file.
• Required review: No additional owning-squad review signal was detected.

Posted by x-engineering-agent (Reviewer)

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

🔔 Routing this PR to @Azure/act-identity-squad.

[x-engineering-agent]

X Engineering Agent Report

⏳ In progress — X Engineering Agent is reviewing this PR at c32240f. This comment will be updated with the results.