Skip to content

Finish Documentation of Database Backends #1

Description

@gtfierro

Current page at: https://docs.brickschema.org/software/database.html

Documentation/links required for:

  • Oxigraph
  • Apache Jena
  • Blazegraph
  • Stardog
  • Virtuoso
  • TopBraid
  • Azure Digital Twins
  • GraphDB

Activity

  1. linsong commented on Dec 28, 2020

    @linsong

    Glad to know there will be a document about the backend databases, this will be pretty helpful.

    I found the Redland RDF Library is useful. It includes a set of libraries/tools for graph storage, RDF data file parsers and SPARQL query(SPARQL 1.1 partly supported, no property path support yet) library. Since it is written in C, a good fit for low end device.

    I tried the roqet command line that supports SPARQL on a TTL file, it works well.

    One main drawback is its development had been stopped since 2014, not sure if this is relevant to the new document or not.

  2. iamliamc commented on Jan 3, 2021

    @iamliamc

    When you get a chance @gtfierro you can checkout my basic implementation using Neo4j and Neosemantics...
    https://github.com/iamliamc/neo4j-brick

  3. georghildebrand commented on Jan 4, 2021

    @georghildebrand

    We recently benchmarked and tried several databases for building knowledge graphs including brick ontology for smart homes but also smart factory etc. One important aspect for us is to have ability to check data constraints (SHACL) eg. to check also data classification requirements for legal reasons (e.g. for the data that an IoT device produces)

    @gtfierro you could consider adding:

    • Azure digital Twins
    • Stardog
    • Virtuoso
  4. gtfierro commented on Jan 4, 2021

    @gtfierro
    MemberAuthor

    @georghildebrand it looks like you didn't finish a sentence there ("One important aspect for us to have ability...") --- could you fill in the needs of the platform?

    I've added the other platforms to the list of documentation we will need to add. If you are able, it would help me (and the Brick community) out include some of your findings in our documentation -- anything you can contribute would be welcome!

  5. georghildebrand commented on Jan 5, 2021

    @georghildebrand

    Yes true, looks like I went to a meet and then just send out all the open tabs >D. Thx @gtfierro

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions