Skip to content

docs: document renaming a site - #39

Merged
vigneshrajsb merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
site-rename
Oct 13, 2026
Merged

vigneshrajsb merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
site-rename

Conversation

@vigneshrajsb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reader and task

  • Audience: application developers and site owners
  • Task/outcome: rename a hosted site in the UI, CLI, or API

Source of truth

  • Exact owning repository revisions, PR head SHAs, or immutable artifacts: GoodRxOSS/lifecycle, GoodRxOSS/lifecycle-cli, and GoodRxOSS/lifecycle-ui site-rename branches (PRs open, not merged)
  • Frontmatter verification baseline added or reused: reused (not changed)
  • Product or runtime verification: not run; based on the PR branches
  • Contract checks (schema / OpenAPI / CLI; identify any SKIP): check:contracts ran with schema, OpenAPI, and CLI all SKIP
  • Unavailable or unresolved sources: none

Documentation changes

  • Changed pages: Sites, CLI
  • ASD-STE100 human review: style baseline refreshed with update:style-baseline; reviewer to confirm wording
  • Navigation or redirects: none
  • Raw Markdown projection: check:raw passes
  • External state: none
  • Screenshots, catalog status, and manual pixel/state review: none; no visuals changed

Verification

  • Formatted changed files
  • Kept source-review evidence and non-actionable implementation details out of end-user prose
  • Confirmed that each changed sentence helps the reader understand, complete, verify, or recover the task
  • Reviewed all 53 rule rows in .agents/skills/update-lifecycle-docs/references/ste100-review.md
  • bun run check:styles
  • Updated the style baseline only after the complete human review
  • bun run check:raw
  • bun run verify
  • bun run check:contracts --require-all when schema, API, or CLI claims changed
  • Checked changed routes with an approved desktop browser inspection tool
  • Checked every theme enabled by the current theme config
  • Ran bun run check:screenshots when visuals changed
  • Confirmed screenshots contain no secrets or personal/private data
  • Confirmed tracked guidance has no contributor-specific paths, hosts, credentials, or fixture identities

@vigneshrajsb
vigneshrajsb marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2026 00:44
@vigneshrajsb
vigneshrajsb requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2026 00:44
@vigneshrajsb
vigneshrajsb merged commit e4897e5 into main Oct 13, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant