Repository navigation
Do the image timeline results agree exactly with the number of images reported in the coverage plots? #401
Description
The image timeline in Helioviewer is intended to show the number of images per unit time (although if you consider small enough time intervals the image observation times are shown individually). The bokeh-based coverage plots show the number of files per day. IIRC these plots are built from different queries.
When the unit of time is "per day", the helioviewer timeline results should be the same as the coverage plots. I don't know if this is the case, but it should be checked. Ensuring consistency between the two means it will be easier to understand for the user and for helioviewer developers if and when there are data gaps.
Activity
[-]Does the image timeline agree with the number of images reported in the coverage plots?[/-][+]Do the image timeline results agree exactly with the number of images reported in the coverage plots?[/+]dgarciabriseno commentedon Jul 24, 2024
It looks like they do agree, at least for SOHO.
I confirmed with other dates for soho as well. Going to check with some other data sources
dgarciabriseno commentedon Aug 5, 2024
Noting that there is an issue here with STEREO-A COR-1
See screenshot below, we have data for COR1, but image timeline shows 0 images.
Link: https://helioviewer.org/load/c74fab7b8f611b01b7e262b0b4bf901912ef9d573d25717e8b4f9b7665f9f8ca