Skip to content

GOES-19 #413

Open
Open

Description

@helioshk

It would be great if GOES-19 could be included in HV as soon as it is available, particularly the coronagraph of course.
Maybe someone has insight when it could be expected.

Activity

  1. wafels commented on Oct 14, 2024

    @wafels
    Contributor

    GOES-19 CCOR data is not available yet. When it is, we will endeavor to provide JPEG2000 files of the available data as soon as possible.

  2. helioshk commented on Feb 9, 2025

    @helioshk
    Author

    Preliminary non-operational CCOR images are now available every 15 minutes, I don't know if this also applies for JPEG2000 files though.
    https://testbed.spaceweather.gov/products/ccor-1-coronagraph

    Until [...] GOES-19 becomes operational, currently planned for April 4th [...]

  3. dgarciabriseno commented on Feb 10, 2025

    @dgarciabriseno
    Contributor

    I worked with one of the engineers at NOAA to help enable creating JPEG2000s for CCOR.

    My information so far is that they will make a public directory of jp2's when CCOR becomes operational, and we'll pull those into Helioviewer.

  4. helioshk commented on Apr 9, 2025

    @helioshk
    Author

    CCOR-1 is now operational.

  5. helioshk commented on May 14, 2025

    @helioshk
    Author

    Bump

  6. bogdanni commented on May 14, 2025

    @bogdanni
    Contributor

    Probably news in couple of weeks.

  7. dgarciabriseno commented on Jun 30, 2025

    @dgarciabriseno
    Contributor

    Data will be available on JHelioviewer shortly.

    On Helioviewer.org we still have some work to do because the jpeg2000 images are not oriented the way the web system needs. We're working on a solution to this problem but may not be ready for a few more months.

  8. helioshk commented on Feb 2, 2026

    @helioshk
    Author

    CCOR is currently not available on any server. I think it was only on GSFC which seems to be offline. Is it possible to make CCOR available on IAS?

  9. dgarciabriseno commented on Aug 11, 2026

    @dgarciabriseno
    Contributor

    @ebuchlin Can you pull in CCOR on your end for redundancy?

  10. ebuchlin commented on Aug 11, 2026

    @ebuchlin

    Yes, we will do that (expect a few weeks, because of the summer holidays).

    At GSFC, I can only see GOES/CCOR-1/White light, and only in JHV, I guess because of the image rotation issue. The rotation issue is linked to #494.

    On our instance of helioviewer.org, we have "GOES-R" (currently only for SUVI) while it is "GOES" at GSFC. Should we change something about that?

  11. helioshk commented on Aug 26, 2026

    @helioshk
    Author

    The letter (GOES-R) was the designation of the satellite before it had reached orbit, GOES-R is now GOES-16.
    CCOR-1 is onboard GOES-19 (previously GOES-U).
    So a generic "GOES" would be more accurate.

  12. helioshk commented on Sep 3, 2026

    @helioshk
    Author

    Another thing.. the default contrast settings in JHV are not ideal, maybe that can be improved?
    Screenshotss NOAA Website vs JHelioviewer with default settings:

    Image Image
  13. ebuchlin commented on Sep 4, 2026

    @ebuchlin

    The letter (GOES-R) was the designation of the satellite before it had reached orbit, GOES-R is now GOES-16. CCOR-1 is onboard GOES-19 (previously GOES-U). So a generic "GOES" would be more accurate.

    We will start working on the hvpull for GOES/CCOR-1 now. We will also update our data sources table so that "GOES" is displayed instead of "GOES-R", already for SUVI.

  14. ebuchlin commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @ebuchlin

    Since we have done this, it seems that it is running fine and the data are updated regularly (we have today's data for SUVI and CCOR-1 on https://helioviewer.ias.u-psud.fr/ )

  15. bogdanni commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @bogdanni
    Contributor

    @helioshk JHV shows the data exactly as it was prepared by NOAA. Looks like they prepare it differently for their website. I will raise this next time I'm in contact with them.

  16. ebuchlin commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @ebuchlin

    Aren't they the same JP2 files for JHV and the web app?

  17. bogdanni commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @bogdanni
    Contributor

    Which web app? They just make separate jpegs for their web page, i.e., https://services.swpc.noaa.gov/products/ccor1/jpegs/
    Their processing looks indeed different from the JP2s.

  18. dgarciabriseno commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @dgarciabriseno
    Contributor

    @ebuchlin At Goddard we aren't showing CCOR-1 in the Helioviewer web app because it doesn't take into account the image rotation. These jpeg2000's weren't calibrated to render correctly in our web app. JHV processes the WCS metadata independently so it shows correctly there.

  19. dgarciabriseno commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @dgarciabriseno
    Contributor

    We are ingesting it and serving to JHV only at this time.

  20. ebuchlin commented on Oct 1, 2026

    @ebuchlin

    @bogdanni the "wep app" is "helioviewer.org" (including the IAS instance). @dgarciabriseno ah, indeed, then we should also hide it...

  21. ebuchlin commented on Oct 5, 2026

    @ebuchlin

    We've hidden CCOR-1 from our helioviewer.org instance. It is still available in JHV. I guess we will be able to show it again in helioviewer.org when #513 will be finalized, as WCS information (including roll) should then be taken into account properly.

    Can this issue be closed or are we waiting for #513?

  22. bogdanni commented on Oct 5, 2026

    @bogdanni
    Contributor

    Is the approach in #513 the optimal one?

    IMHO, it's just a crutch: my suggestion would be to replace all that with SunPy which can already read the JP2 metadata and then use the full power of AstroPy to map the data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions