[Waterdrips]

What

• New /platform-review/ page for the fixed-scope review: key facts (duration, price, team time, access), the six areas covered, a week-by-week outline, deliverables, who it suits, and a "Book a review" email link.
• Promoted across the site with a ReviewBanner under the services grid on the home page and services index, plus links from the footer and the Reviews & training service page.
• Per-post calls to action. Blog posts can now set cta in frontmatter (platform-review, private-eks, eks-upgrades, delivery, platform). This shows a matching box at the end of the post and hides the generic "Got a platform problem?" banner. The copy for each lives in postCtas in src/data/site.ts.
• Tagged the EKS series, the audit findings post, the Helm testing post and the loft.sh post, and removed their closing "get in touch" paragraphs, which the box replaces.
• Separate commit: adds an astro-preview entry to .claude/launch.json.

Why

The review is the easiest way for a new client to start working with us, but it was only one bullet on a service page. Readers who finish a technical post should be pointed to the service that matches it.

Reviewer notes

• Price is still a placeholder. review.price is undefined, so the page says "Fixed, agreed before we start". Set it (e.g. "From £X + VAT") in src/data/site.ts to show a figure. The two-week duration is also a suggestion.
• The review page links to the audit findings post only once that post is published (it's a draft until 7 Nov), so production builds won't link to a draft.
• astro check reports 0 errors and npm run build passes. I checked the review page, the services banner and the post call-to-action boxes in the dev server.