CommonMarkAdditionalFeatures like tables

[yufeih]

In addition to the strike through syntax, are there any plains to support more additional features, specifically tables as described here?

[Knagis]

There are no current plans for myself to implement any additional features that are not in the spec since there are pending work from the recent spec versions that require work.

However if someone would create a PR for the github table syntax that does not have negative performance impact to base scenario (parsing without any additional features) then I would gladly include it.

[ratishphilip]

@Knagis
Hi,
First of all, this is an awesome project. Great work!
Just wanted to know if there is any possibility of including the tables feature in the near future.

[Knagis]

My answer hasn't really changed since last august...

There have been some work on the tables though that you might find useful:

• https://github.com/AMDL/CommonMark.NET/tree/pipe-tables
• https://github.com/kevin-montrose/CommonMark.NET/tree/ast-transforms-and-tables-squashed