Repository navigation
factory: refuse to squash-merge a branch that is behind its base #883
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
LSantha
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
opencode/issue872-20261108200100
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6a366f0
fs: stop narrowing the FAT32 formatter's disk size and epoch to int
LSantha 8ab3d61
Address review: FatUtils.getMilliSeconds ignored its argument, so the…
LSantha 4cfb496
Drop the duplicate FatFileSystemType import the previous commit intro…
LSantha e8ed0b6
factory: refuse to squash-merge a branch that is behind its base
LSantha ded4aa3
Address review on #872: orchestrator tests, honest wording, and --for…
LSantha c4dc4e2
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into opencode/issue872-2…
LSantha File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 Override asymmetry: ticket-runner has /oc approve --force to bypass this gate; the orchestrator human-approval path refuses unconditionally — there is no way, even for an owner who has verified the branch is stale-but-safe or who is unblocking a parked task, to get the merge through this runner. The only escape hatch is the GitHub merge button, which bypasses every gate (CI, diff budget, forbidden paths) rather than just this one. If deliberate, the in-code comment should say so ("UI is the escape hatch") and the PR description should state it; if not, mirror an override or document why orchestrator tasks cannot have one. Ticket-runner tasks and orchestrator tasks go through the same approve flow, so the asymmetry will read as a bug to whoever hits it next.