Skip to content

Update LoopDocs for dev v3.14.5 - #1061

Open
marionbarker wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
update/dev_3.14.5
Open

Update LoopDocs for dev v3.14.5#1061
marionbarker wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
update/dev_3.14.5

Conversation

@marionbarker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@marionbarker
marionbarker marked this pull request as draft September 6, 2026 18:02
@marionbarker
marionbarker marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2026 22:58
@marionbarker
marionbarker requested review from itsmojo and ps2 September 6, 2026 22:59
The `feat/all-managers` branch replaces several [retired feature branches](#table-of-retired-branches). If you need a feature branch for a Dana pump - you need to build this branch. Be sure to review the [Status For Dana Support](#status-for-dana-support) section.

If you previously used a feature branch for Medtrum or Eversense support, you can switch to the `dev` branch.
If you previously used a feature branch for Medtrum or Eversense support, you can switch to the `main` branch, with updates coming in to the `dev` branch.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On another line, Eversense is in the feat/all managers branch. On this line, it's in loop-main

Comment thread docs/faqs/omnipod-faqs.md

* The `dev` branch uses a connect-on-demand method for connecting to both DASH and Omnipod 5 Pods so you may notice a slight delay in connecting, getting status and then responding to a command from Loop
* This is normal, be patient
* [Will I still get 203 errors?](#will-i-still-get-203-errors) - we do not know but early testing indicates reduced frequency of 203 faults for Atlas DASH Pods

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI, we have always had some periodic 203 pod faults even the older DASH (SAW) pods, so these still could be occasionally occurring even if the new connect on demand method is able to completely eliminate the huge increase in 203 pod faults with Atlas pods (for some lot #'s).

Comment thread docs/faqs/omnipod-faqs.md
The increased frequency of faults noticed with DASH Atlas Pods has not been observed in the Ominpod 5 Pods tested to date. Considering just the Pods that are not expired, there is a 3% failure rate with the failure being an occlusion (105) fault. There were testers in the private beta group using DASH instead of Omnipod 5. They had a 20% failure rate on a small sample of DASH Pods, all 203 faults near the 72 hours time frame.

> see [Updates in `next-dev` branch only](#updates-in-next-dev-branch-only)
Both the `dev` and `next-dev` branches use a new connect-on-demand method that appears to reduce the frequency of 203 faults for Atlas DASH pod. In addition, not 203 faults have been observed to date by any of the Omnipod 5 testers.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"no* 203 faults

Comment thread docs/faqs/omnipod-faqs.md
* Omnipod 5 code is experimental and does not provide a heartbeat
* This means you rely on your CGM to wake up the app when it is in the background or the phone is locked

**To date, no iPhone model specific issues have been found with Omnipod 5 Pods.**

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could expand this to say "with all Omnipod 5 Pod variants tested".

Comment thread docs/loop-3/omnipod.md
The "Pod Keep Alive" option is found the bottom of the "Omnipod DASH" screen. This is intended to assist users who have both an iPhone 16 (all models) or 17e and [DASH Pods with a InPlay BLE (Atlas) board](../faqs/omnipod-faqs.md#keep-alive-atlas-or-inplay-dash-pods){: target="_blank" }. Model 17 phones, except for the 17e, do not exhibit this problem. No action is taken automatically unless both these cases are detected to be true.

The concept is by choosing one of the Pod Keep Alive choices, the app sends a getStatus to the Pod before the 3 minute disconnect happens. Therefore, so long as you and the Pod stay close to the phone, the Pod will be connected for any command (either manual or automatic) including bolus, temp basal, modify scheduled basal rates, suspend, or deactivate.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should add a note saying that Pod Keep Alive was rewritten to correctly integrate into OmnipodKit and that any old Pod Keep Alive settings will not be kept. Thus Pod Keep Alive must be manually re-enabled if needed. The RileyLink connections will be shown in the pump (Omnipod DASH) view under the Pod Keep Alive button when the RileyLink option is selected. These connections are managed just like the RileyLink switches for Omnipod Classic Pods.

If you are running a Pod and you transition to the OmnipodKit Pump Manager, then any build you install on your phone should have OmnipodKit. If you need to downgrade to a build earlier than v3.14.2, do so after deactivating a Pod.
## OmnipodKit Information

When you build the `main` or `dev` (v3.14.2 or newer) branch or `next-dev` (v3.15.0 or newer) branch over an older build, your Pod is automatically transitioned to use a new Pump Manager: OmnipodKit. You will notice the user interface is a little different from the older managers (OmniKit and OmniBLE).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All the previous settings from OmniKit and OmniBLE will automatically transfer over to OmnipodKit except for "Pod Keep Alive" which must be manually re-enabled if needed when transitioning from OmniBLE or OmnipodKit version v3.14.4 or older.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants