[jtravs]

Summary

• Helium on matched measures (TC-1092, corrects TC-1050). New tier-3 source travers_2026_pyroraptor: helium with both electrons active, haCC(1), haCC(5) and one electron at 390 nm (A2's 6 fs pulse), read as the population above the bound shells n <= 4 and n <= 5 1000 au after the pulse, which is converged in the box; and haCC in Sato et al.'s 800 nm pulse with their measure.
  • The atom is 1.65 and 1.61 times one electron (1.60 and 1.56 at the angular limit), not 1.71 to 1.79.
  • haCC(5) is 0.98 to 0.99 of the exact atom at 390 nm and 0.98 to 1.00 of MCTDHF at 800 nm; haCC(1) is 0.96, and 0.95 to 0.98. TC-1050's 0.76 to 0.81 compared tRecX norm-losses that measure different things.
  • Parker et al.'s rate over the pulse is 1.00 and 0.97 of the atom: confirmed; helium's N_eff of 1.47 stands.
• Xenon in RMT's field (TC-1093). Part N of the tRecX runs: one 5p electron (m = 0 and 1) at RMT's ionisation energy in the field Hartmann et al.'s RMT wrote, read with RMT's measure (ground-state survival at 3000 au). RMT's atom depletes like 0.53 to 0.63 of one m = 0 electron; the default 1.5 to 2.1 times RMT.
• Hartmann et al.'s measured neutral abundance (TC-1094). The default's depletion is 0.96 to 1.13 of the measured up to 1.6e14 W/cm2; the measurement is below RMT's survival up to 1.9e14 W/cm2. Xenon's N_eff (1.5) and uncertainty factor (3) are unchanged.
• Validators helium_matched_ratios, xenon_rmt_ratios, xenon_survival; three generated manual tables; changelog, counts and the golden identity digests of He and Xe (text of their reasons only).

No recommended value, model value or stored fit changed.

Verification

• poe check: lint, types, numpydoc, codespell, reuse clean; coverage 100 %; two test-hygiene failures in the new tests (tolerance floors, the page test's table list) were fixed and those files re-run green; the docs build (poe docs) succeeds after two docstring fixes. The whole gate was not re-run after the fixes.
• poe test-library: 512 passed.
• Every row of the four pyroraptor tables checked against its JSON record (112 rows); part N's values against the runs' report.

For review

• The two-electron angular correction (3.1 %) is a report's printed ladder on the absorbed norm-loss at one intensity; it is the stated uncertainty, not applied to the values.
• Part N's inputs are kept byte for byte (they name the pulse file by its cluster path), as with the earlier tRecX runs; the run list's paths use $RUN_ROOT.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01PiTg5xCtsHUFpsdY2EjpB5

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[read-the-docs-community]

Documentation build overview

📚 optmat | 🛠️ Build #35203054 | 📁 Comparing ced6252 against latest (a5fef6a)

  🔍 Preview build  

95 files changed · + 1 added · ± 94 modified

+ Added

• generated/sources/travers_2026_pyroraptor.html

± Modified

• changelog.html
• genindex.html
• register.html
• sg_execution_times.html
• introduction/overview.html
• user-guide/ionisation-accuracy.html
• user-guide/ionisation-laser.html
• user-guide/ionisation-static.html
• api/generated/optmat.datasets.html
• api/generated/optmat.gas.absorption.html
• and 84 more...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!