Skip to content

fix(sandbox): a sandbox chat says it is starting the sandbox, not ACP Registry - #74

Merged
t3-code-sandboxes[bot] merged 1 commit into
feat/sandbox-environmentsfrom
fix/sandbox-starting-label
Nov 15, 2026
Merged

t3-code-sandboxes[bot] merged 1 commit into
feat/sandbox-environmentsfrom
fix/sandbox-starting-label

Conversation

@t3-code-sandboxes

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Stacked on #73.

Problem. After a sandbox chat sat idle, T3 released its provider session as it does for any provider, and the next send showed "Starting ACP Registry". The host thread runs on the sandbox bridge, which uses the generic ACP Registry driver, so the label showed that internal driver name. A normal chat shows "Starting Claude" there.

Fix. providerStartingLabel (client-runtime, used by web and mobile) labels a run on the sandbox bridge instance "Starting sandbox", the wording T3 already uses for sandboxes elsewhere. Every other provider is unchanged.

Test plan

  • threadExecution.test.ts "labels an open run whose provider has not started a turn": a bridge run reads "Starting sandbox" (base: "Starting ACP Registry")
  • vp run check:changed origin/chore/sync-upstream

Claude Opus 5.5 via Claude Code.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… Registry

A sandbox chat's host thread runs on the sandbox bridge, which uses the
generic ACP Registry driver, so a send after the session was released read
"Starting ACP Registry". It now reads "Starting sandbox".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Base automatically changed from chore/sync-upstream to feat/sandbox-environments November 15, 2026 21:16
@t3-code-sandboxes
t3-code-sandboxes Bot merged commit 6db76d3 into feat/sandbox-environments Nov 15, 2026
@t3-code-sandboxes
t3-code-sandboxes Bot deleted the fix/sandbox-starting-label branch November 15, 2026 21:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant