[MaxGhenis]

Runs PolicyEngine/.github's reusable Axiom parity check on every PR (PolicyEngine/.github#9).

• What it does. It verifies the description's axiom: line against GitHub:
  • queued issues must exist, carry pe-parity and be dispatch-ready;
  • encoded PRs must exist and be open or merged;
  • encoded-correct modules and companion tests must exist on rulespec-uk main;
  • n/a needs an allowed category.
    It also comments with suggested lines, found by mapping the changed files' reference URLs to Axiom modules and open issues.
• Warn-only. It reports in the job summary and never fails the job. Enforcing comes later, after a couple of weeks of results.
• PR template. It now shows the canonical claims: the companion test for encoded-correct, and the category for n/a.

Draft until PolicyEngine/.github#9 merges. The caller points at that PR's branch so this PR exercises the workflow end to end. Before merging, I'll switch it to @main and drop tooling-ref.

axiom: n/a: infra: CI workflow and PR template only

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[juaristi22]

Reviewed at 82a4db385d8db0104d29ec6b6868dced5f6ebca0. No new findings in the Axiom parity caller, template and changelog.

I checked the caller against the actual referenced reusable workflow: supported inputs, PR events, warn mode, permissions, separate trusted-tool checkout and disabled fork comments match. Both YAML files parsed and the interface assertions passed. The current-head Axiom parity job succeeds; the unrelated Test job is cancelled. No local actionlint or live-job execution was performed.

The acknowledged draft landing prerequisite remains: after PolicyEngine/.github#9 merges, switch the reusable workflow reference to @main and remove tooling-ref.