Skip to content

Develop Coherent Design: optional depth, clarity, and meaningful consent #56

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
raelovejoy wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Develop Coherent Design: optional depth, clarity, and meaningful consent #56

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ba2a409
Develop standalone Coherent Design principles and research questions
raelovejoy Oct 29, 2026
1b1d832
Link Coherent Design to contextual coherence inquiry
raelovejoy Oct 29, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions concepts/humane-design.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ One can exist without the other. A humane design intervention can be temporary.

## Working status

The [Coherent Design research inquiry](../research/coherent-design/README.md) develops unburdensomeness, optional complexity, accommodation, clarification, meaningful consent, negotiation, and plural representations. It is exploratory and author-review pending; this page and the existing Human(e) Design Review remain the shared translation practice rather than a second copy of that inquiry.

This is an ecosystem concept and methodology in development. It should remain open to established accessibility, participatory-design, service-design, human-factors, safety, community-governance, and other traditions rather than pretending Root Sequence invented the underlying practices.

The distinctive contribution is the connective role: explicitly translating the human-scale observations of Being Human(e) into testable design questions while keeping power, uncertainty, maintenance, reversibility, and non-domination visible.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions research/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ This directory holds bounded research inquiries and versioned papers that synthe

## Research areas

- [Coherent Design](coherent-design/README.md) — **exploratory / AI-assisted / author review pending**. Investigates coherent defaults, optional complexity, accommodation, clarification, meaningful consent, conflict negotiation, plural representations, and recursive design. Includes sources and unexecuted comparisons; builds on Human(e) Design without replacing its shared review practice.

- [Conscious Systems](conscious-systems/README.md) — **exploratory, AI-assisted seed; author review pending**. Starts with [what can change about a mind while preserving consciousness](conscious-systems/what-can-we-change-about-a-mind.md), separating experience from report, capability, and authority.

- [What If It All Works?](what-if-it-all-works/README.md) — **exploratory / AI-assisted / author review pending**. Investigates what counts as progress, who benefits, meaningful access, contested ideals, ethical uncertainty, and why imperfection neither excuses harm nor defeats improvement.
Expand Down
Loading