Repository navigation
feat(core): support meta.provider with backward compatibility - #402
Open
brandonwilliams33 wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
brandonwilliams33 wants to merge 4 commits into
brandonwilliams33 wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
brandonwilliams33
requested review from
Akshat0694,
arunim2405 and
refeed
as code owners
October 14, 2026 07:59
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
refeed
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2026
refeed
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pr itself looks good. But I'll test it first because it turns out this is a very big change for the good first issue task :). In the meantime, feel free to take tasks that has no assignee, thanks
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
What changes are being made?
meta.providerwhile keepingmeta.required_providersupported. When both are present,providertakes precedence.meta.required_providerso existing consumers receive the same output.Why are these changes necessary?
Which issues or tickets does this PR close or relate to?
meta.required_providertometa.provider, keeping backward compatibility #369.Type of Change
Checklist
Screenshots or Recordings (if applicable)
Not applicable.
Additional Information
Tested locally with Python 3.12:
pytest tests/ --ignore=tests/providers/terraform_plan/test_direct_references.py -q: 931 passed.git diff --checkpassed.The excluded test file requires AWS credentials for its Terraform plan tests. Those tests are also skipped by the repository in GitHub Actions. Compatibility was checked using existing Terraform plan fixtures.