lockkernel is a Python package about synchronization: many
oscillators, each with a slightly different natural frequency, start to
move in step once the coupling between them is strong enough. Below a
certain coupling (the threshold) nothing happens; above it, a
collective motion appears and grows. The package answers the questions
one asks about that onset:
- At what coupling does synchronization start?
- How fast does it grow above that point? Near the threshold the growth
follows a power law, and the power is called the exponent
(
beta). - Is the onset smooth, or does the system jump and show hysteresis (a first-order onset)?
- Given a measured onset, from an experiment or a simulation, what are the threshold and the exponent, with error bars? What does the exponent say about the system? How many measurements does a target error bar need?
It has two halves. The theory half computes the onset exactly from
two inputs: the spread of natural frequencies, and the locking
kernel, a function that says how strongly an oscillator follows the
group as a function of how far its own frequency is from the group's.
The collective motion must be the one the oscillators themselves
produce (the "self-consistency condition"); one substitution turns
that condition into an exact formula (a "parametric solution") valid
for any frequency spread and any kernel. The exponent depends only on how fast the kernel falls off
far from the centre (its tail). The lab half (lockkernel.measured)
works the other way round: it fits measured points for the threshold
and the exponent, reads the kernel's tail back off the exponent, and
plans how many points a target error bar costs. When the data cannot
support the number asked for, it stops with an error message that says
why, rather than returning a number that looks fine but is not.
- A short guide to the words used here
- Install and conventions
- Examples (each with the output it prints)
- What is in the package
- When it refuses, and why
- How the results are checked
- Corrections in earlier versions
- Limits
- Where it comes from
- Citing, support and license
- Detuning
delta-- how far one oscillator's natural frequency is from the centre of the group. - Line shape
p(delta)-- the distribution of detunings across the group (the name comes from spectroscopy, where it is the shape of a spectral line). The package ships a Lorentzian, a Gaussian, a Student-t (heavy tails), a box (flat) and a two-peaked Gaussian, and you can build your ownLineShape. - Coupling
chiN-- the coupling per oscillator times the number of oscillators. The thresholdchiN_cis the coupling where synchronization starts. - Order parameter
R-- how synchronized the group is: 0 for no common motion, 1 for perfect step. It is zero below the threshold. - Reduced coupling
eps = chiN/chiN_c - 1-- the relative distance above the threshold. Near the onsetR ~ A eps^beta, with amplitudeAand exponentbeta. - Locking bandwidth
Omega = chiN * R-- the range of detunings over which an oscillator follows the group. - Locking kernel
W(u)-- the time-averaged share of an oscillator that lines up with the group, as a function of its detuning in units of the locking bandwidth,u = delta/Omega.W(0) = 1(an oscillator at the centre follows perfectly) andWis even. Its massmis its area,m = integral W(u) du. Its tail exponentsdescribes how fast it falls far out:W ~ |u|^-s. The package's kernels are:- conservative
W = 1/(1+u^2), for spins with no damping (s = 2, masspi); - Kuramoto
W = sqrt(1-u^2)for|u| < 1and 0 outside, for overdamped phase oscillators, whose motion is dominated by friction (the classic Kuramoto model; no tail at all, masspi/2); - the test family
W = 1/(1+|u|^s), and a Gaussian kernel; - a kernel averaged over a broad, power-law spread of coupling
strengths between oscillators (
heterogeneous).
- conservative
- The rule that links them (from the
parametricmodule's derivation, and tested below): the threshold ischiN_c = 1/(p(0) m), and the exponent isbeta = 1/(s-1)for1 < s < 3andbeta = 1/2fors >= 3or for a kernel with no algebraic tail. So a measuredbetaabove 1/2 names the tail,s = 1 + 1/beta, whilebeta = 1/2only says "s >= 3" and cannot name one value. The value 1/2 needs a line with a rounded top at its centre (p''(0) < 0, true for every shipped line exceptbox). On a line that is flat at the centre, such asbox, a tail givesbeta = 1/(s-1)for everys > 1(so below 1/2 onces > 3), and a kernel with no tail gives a jump instead of a power law (see Limits). - Order of the onset -- for the conservative kernel, the sign of
one number
c(an integral over the line shape) decides it:c > 0gives a smooth (continuous) onset,c < 0a jump with hysteresis (first order). - Cumulant dynamics, Wineland parameter -- terms from the quantum-spin half of the package; see What is in the package.
pip install lockkernel
It needs Python 3.9 or newer, NumPy 1.22 or newer, SciPy 1.8 or newer and mpmath 1.2 or newer, and nothing else.
- Units. Detunings, line widths, couplings
chiNand the locking bandwidthOmegashare one frequency unit of your choice (the line width is a natural one). In the dynamics modules, time is in the inverse of that unit (the Hamiltonian is written with hbar = 1). - Precision. The theory half (
parametric,kernels,lineshapes) works in mpmath's arbitrary precision and returns mpmath numbers. Set the working precision withmpmath.mp.dps(decimal digits). The reduced couplingepskeeps that precision however close to the threshold it is (since 1.2.0), so the working precision does not need to exceed the number of decades you step towards the onset. The lab half and the dynamics work in ordinary floating point with NumPy. - Line shapes are normalised probability densities;
lorentzianandgaussiantake a full width at half maximum,boxa half width.
Each example below runs as written, and the output shown is what it printed with lockkernel 1.2.0. Line widths, couplings and noise levels are illustrative values, not taken from any experiment.
import mpmath as mp
from lockkernel.lineshapes import lorentzian, gaussian
from lockkernel.kernels import conservative, kuramoto, power_tail, predicted_beta
from lockkernel.parametric import threshold, extract_beta
mp.mp.dps = 25 # working precision of mpmath, in decimal digits
line = lorentzian(fwhm=1.0)
print("threshold, conservative kernel:", mp.nstr(threshold(line, conservative()), 15))
print("threshold, Kuramoto kernel: ", mp.nstr(threshold(line, kuramoto()), 15))
# Local slopes d log R / d log eps at Omega = 1e-3 ... 1e-6 (closest to onset last).
slopes = extract_beta(gaussian(1.0), power_tail(2.5), [-3, -4, -5, -6])
print("local exponents:", [mp.nstr(b, 8) for b in slopes])
print("predicted 1/(s-1):", predicted_beta(2.5))threshold, conservative kernel: 0.5
threshold, Kuramoto kernel: 1.0
local exponents: ['0.67152587', '0.6681861', '0.66714445']
predicted 1/(s-1): 0.6666666666666666
The threshold is 1/(p(0) m): the kernel enters only through its
mass, so the Kuramoto threshold (mass pi/2) is twice the
conservative one (mass pi) on every line. extract_beta steps the
exact branch towards the onset and returns the local slope between
neighbouring points; the list settling down is the evidence that the
exponent has been reached. List the exponents of Omega so that the
one closest to the onset comes last, because the last entry is the
one to quote. Here it is within 0.1 % of 2/3.
import mpmath as mp
from lockkernel.lineshapes import lorentzian
from lockkernel.kernels import conservative
from lockkernel.parametric import branch_point
mp.mp.dps = 30
line, kern = lorentzian(fwhm=1.0), conservative()
a = mp.mpf(1) / 2 # half width of this line
for Omega in ["1e-2", "1e-4", "1e-6"]:
chiN, R, eps = branch_point(line, kern, mp.mpf(Omega))
gap = abs(R - (1 - a / chiN))
print(f"Omega={Omega}: chiN={mp.nstr(chiN, 10)} R={mp.nstr(R, 10)} "
f"eps={mp.nstr(eps, 6)} matches 1 - a/chiN to 1e-28: {gap < 1e-28}")Omega=1e-2: chiN=0.51 R=0.01960784314 eps=0.02 matches 1 - a/chiN to 1e-28: True
Omega=1e-4: chiN=0.5001 R=0.000199960008 eps=0.0002 matches 1 - a/chiN to 1e-28: True
Omega=1e-6: chiN=0.500001 R=1.999996e-6 eps=2.0e-6 matches 1 - a/chiN to 1e-28: True
The branch is traced by choosing the locking bandwidth Omega and
reading off the coupling and the order parameter. No equation is
solved, so nothing is lost to cancellation near the threshold. For
conservative spins on a Lorentzian line the answer is known in closed
form (chiN = a + Omega, R = 1 - a/chiN), and the package matches
it to 1e-28 at 30 digits.
import mpmath as mp
from lockkernel.lineshapes import lorentzian, gaussian, bimodal_gaussian
from lockkernel.parametric import amplitude, c_coefficient
for line in (lorentzian(1.0), gaussian(1.0)):
print(f"{line.name:10s} A = {mp.nstr(amplitude(line), 12)}")
print("pi/2 =", mp.nstr(mp.pi / 2, 12))
# Two Gaussian peaks (width 1) at +-sep/2: the sign of c decides the order.
for sep in (1.0, 4.0):
c = c_coefficient(bimodal_gaussian(sep))
kind = "continuous onset" if c > 0 else "first order (hysteretic) onset"
print(f"sep = {sep}: c = {mp.nstr(c, 6)} -> {kind}")lorentzian A = 1.0
gaussian A = 1.57079632679
pi/2 = 1.57079632679
sep = 1.0: c = 0.245044 -> continuous onset
sep = 4.0: c = -0.0891192 -> first order (hysteretic) onset
For conservative spins the exponent is 1, so near the onset
R = A eps, with A = pi p(0)^2 / c. This example runs at mpmath's
default 15 digits; before version 1.1.1 amplitude and
c_coefficient needed about 30 digits to be right (see
Corrections). For two unit-width
Gaussian peaks at +-a, c = (1 - 2x D(x))/pi with x = a/sqrt(2)
and D Dawson's function, and the tests hold c_coefficient to this
formula. So the onset turns first order when the peaks are more than
2.61386 widths apart, where Dawson's function has its maximum.
Example 8 follows the first-order case through its hysteresis loop.
import numpy as np
from lockkernel import fit_branch, kernel_tail_from_beta
from lockkernel.lineshapes import lorentzian
from lockkernel.kernels import power_tail
from lockkernel.parametric import sweep, threshold
# Stand-in "measurement": 14 points of the exact branch for a kernel with
# tail s = 2.5 (so beta = 2/3), with 2 % seeded noise on R.
line, kern = lorentzian(1.0), power_tail(2.5)
pts = sweep(line, kern, np.linspace(-5.0, -2.4, 14))
chi = np.array([float(p[0]) for p in pts])
r = np.array([float(p[1]) for p in pts])
rng = np.random.default_rng(1)
r_meas = r * np.exp(rng.normal(0.0, 0.02, r.size))
fit = fit_branch(chi, r_meas, reference="illustrative: exact branch + 2 % noise",
sigma_r=0.02 * r_meas)
print(f"threshold chi_c = {fit.chi_c:.5f} +- {fit.sigma_chi_c:.1e}"
f" (exact {float(threshold(line, kern)):.5f})")
print(f"exponent beta = {fit.beta:.3f} +- {fit.sigma_beta:.3f} (exact 0.667)")
print(f"amplitude A = {fit.amplitude:.3f} +- {fit.sigma_amplitude:.3f}")
print(f"eps range {fit.eps_range[0]:.2e} .. {fit.eps_range[1]:.2e}, "
f"rms log residual {fit.residual_rms_log:.3f}")
s, s_err = kernel_tail_from_beta(fit.beta, fit.sigma_beta)
print(f"kernel tail s = {s:.2f} +- {s_err:.2f} (true 2.5)")threshold chi_c = 0.59441 +- 3.8e-09 (exact 0.59441)
exponent beta = 0.673 +- 0.003 (exact 0.667)
amplitude A = 0.652 +- 0.019
eps range 1.56e-07 .. 1.09e-03, rms log residual 0.011
kernel tail s = 2.49 +- 0.01 (true 2.5)
fit_branch fits R = A (chi/chi_c - 1)^beta for the threshold,
exponent and amplitude together. With your own data, pass your
couplings and order parameters, and a reference that says where
they come from (it is required). The error bars are the standard
asymptotic ones of a least-squares fit: they are right when the power
law holds over the fitted range and sigma_r is right. Without
sigma_r, the scatter of the points sets them. Since 1.2.0 they are
built from exact derivatives; 1.1.1 printed 3.5e-09 for the
threshold here (see Corrections). Here the fitted
exponent is 2.4 of its own error bars from the exact 2/3; the tests
allow four (see How the results are checked).
kernel_tail_from_beta turns the exponent into the kernel's tail
exponent s = 1 + 1/beta, with error sigma_beta / beta^2.
from lockkernel import (beta_relative_sigma, points_for_beta, kernel_tail_from_beta,
plan_fit, points_for_fit)
# How many points, spread evenly in log(eps) over 2 decades, with 5 %
# scatter in R, for an error bar of 0.01 on beta (threshold known)?
n, achieved = points_for_beta(0.01, decades=2.0, sigma_log=0.05)
print(f"points needed: {n} (error bar {achieved:.5f}); "
f"with {n - 1}: {beta_relative_sigma(n - 1, 2.0, 0.05):.5f}")
# The same range (eps = 1e-4 .. 1e-2), but with the threshold fitted too,
# as fit_branch does it:
plan = plan_fit(n, 1e-4, 1e-2, beta=2/3, sigma_log=0.05)
print(f"{n} points, threshold fitted: beta +- {plan.sigma_beta:.4f}, "
f"chi_c +- {plan.sigma_chi_c_rel:.1e} (relative)")
n_fit, plan = points_for_fit(0.01, 1e-4, 1e-2, beta=2/3, sigma_log=0.05)
print(f"points needed with the threshold fitted: {n_fit} "
f"(error bar {plan.sigma_beta:.5f})")
# A fitted beta = 0.52 +- 0.02 cannot name a kernel tail:
try:
kernel_tail_from_beta(0.52, 0.02)
except ValueError as err:
print("refused:", err)points needed: 12 (error bar 0.00999); with 11: 0.01035
12 points, threshold fitted: beta +- 0.0197, chi_c +- 1.4e-05 (relative)
points needed with the threshold fitted: 57 (error bar 0.00995)
refused: beta = 0.52 +- 0.02 is consistent with 1/2, which identifies only the CLASS s >= 3 (compact support or decay faster than |u|^-3); no single tail exponent can be named from it
beta_relative_sigma gives the error bar of a straight-line slope on a
log-log plot. Despite its name, the result is the absolute error of
beta, not a relative one. It assumes the threshold is known, and
points_for_beta finds the smallest number of points that meets the
target on that assumption.
fit_branch fits the threshold as well, and that costs precision:
the same 12 points give an error bar about twice as large. plan_fit
gives the error bars fit_branch will report (for beta, and
relative ones for chi_c and A), before any data are taken, from
the planned range of eps and the expected beta. points_for_fit
turns that into a number of points: 57 instead of 12 here. How much
fitting the threshold costs depends on how many decades the points
span: for 12 points the error bar grows about 2.0 times over two
decades, 1.6 over three, and 1.3 over five. These are the standard
asymptotic error bars, held in the tests against 300 seeded simulated
fits (within 12 %).
import mpmath as mp
from lockkernel.lineshapes import gaussian
from lockkernel.kernels import kuramoto, heterogeneous, predicted_beta
from lockkernel.parametric import extract_beta
mp.mp.dps = 25
# Kuramoto oscillators whose coupling weights k follow P(k) ~ k^-3.8 (k >= 1).
ker = heterogeneous(kuramoto(), degree_exponent=3.8)
print("tail exponent s of the averaged kernel:", round(ker.tail, 12))
print("predicted beta:", round(predicted_beta(ker.tail), 12))
beta = extract_beta(gaussian(1.0), ker, [-3, -4, -5, -6])[-1]
print("beta from the branch:", mp.nstr(beta, 6))tail exponent s of the averaged kernel: 1.8
predicted beta: 1.25
beta from the branch: 1.24989
When oscillators couple with different strengths k, drawn from a
power law P(k) ~ k^-gamma, the kernel that decides the onset is an
average over them. A strongly coupled oscillator stays locked far out
in detuning, so the averaged kernel gets a tail even when each
oscillator's own kernel has none: s = min(s0, (gamma-2)/eta), with
s0 the tail of the single-oscillator kernel (infinite for Kuramoto).
Here s = 1.8, so beta = 1/(s-1) = 1.25, which is 1/(gamma-3).
import mpmath as mp
from lockkernel.lineshapes import lorentzian, gaussian
from lockkernel.kernels import kuramoto, gaussian_kernel
from lockkernel.parametric import amplitude_curvature, branch_point
mp.mp.dps = 20
for line, kern in [(lorentzian(1.0), kuramoto()), (gaussian(1.0), kuramoto()),
(gaussian(1.0), gaussian_kernel())]:
A = amplitude_curvature(line, kern)
_, R, eps = branch_point(line, kern, mp.mpf("1e-6"))
print(f"{kern.name:9s} kernel, {line.name:10s} line: A = {mp.nstr(A, 12)}, "
f"R/sqrt(eps) at Omega = 1e-6: {mp.nstr(R / mp.sqrt(eps), 12)}")
print("sqrt(pi) =", mp.nstr(mp.sqrt(mp.pi), 12))kuramoto kernel, lorentzian line: A = 1.0, R/sqrt(eps) at Omega = 1e-6: 0.999999999999
kuramoto kernel, gaussian line: A = 1.77245385091, R/sqrt(eps) at Omega = 1e-6: 1.7724538509
gaussian kernel, gaussian line: A = 1.41421356237, R/sqrt(eps) at Omega = 1e-6: 1.41421356237
sqrt(pi) = 1.77245385091
For a kernel with no tail, or a tail s > 3, the onset is
R = A eps^(1/2). The first correction to the self-consistency then
comes from the curvature of the line at its centre, p''(0), and
amplitude_curvature returns
A = G0^(3/2) sqrt(2 / (-p''(0) M2)), where G0 = p(0) m and
M2 = integral u^2 W(u) du is the kernel's second moment
(Kernel.second_moment()). For the Kuramoto kernel on a Lorentzian
line this is 1, the closed form R = sqrt(1 - chiN_c/chiN). On a
Gaussian line the width cancels, which leaves sqrt(pi) (Kuramoto
kernel) and sqrt(2) (Gaussian kernel) at any width. The branch
approaches these values with corrections of relative size
Omega^2, or Omega^(s-3) for a tail 3 < s < 5.
import mpmath as mp
from lockkernel.lineshapes import bimodal_gaussian
from lockkernel.kernels import conservative
from lockkernel.parametric import fold_interval, threshold, extract_beta
line = bimodal_gaussian(4.0) # two Gaussian peaks (width 1) at -2 and +2
f = fold_interval(line, n=30, lo=-2, hi=1)
print("threshold :", mp.nstr(threshold(line, conservative()), 10))
print("hysteresis from chiN =", mp.nstr(f["chiN_lo"], 10), "to", mp.nstr(f["chiN_hi"], 10))
print("R jumps from 0 to :", mp.nstr(f["R_jump"], 10))
print("R where the high branch ends:", mp.nstr(f["R_high_at_lo"], 10))
try:
extract_beta(line, conservative(), [-3, -4, -5])
except ValueError as err:
print("refused:", str(err)[:72], "...")threshold : 5.89561378
hysteresis from chiN = 3.493404803 to 5.89561378
R jumps from 0 to : 0.8480505911
R where the high branch ends: 0.3342759883
refused: eps = -0.0016464 <= 0 at Omega = 10^-3: the branch is at or below the th ...
With the peaks 4 widths apart c < 0 (example 3). The branch leaves
the threshold backwards, then turns round at chiN = 3.4934. In the
usual reading of such a fold (the package computes where the
solutions are, not whether they are stable), raising the coupling
keeps the unsynchronized state up to the threshold, where R jumps to
0.848; lowering it again keeps the synchronized state down to
chiN = 3.4934 (where R = 0.334) before it collapses. fold_interval samples the branch on n points
between Omega = 10^lo and 10^hi and then finds the turning points
and the jump exactly. The tests check every number it returns against
an independent closed form (the Voigt profile). There is no exponent
on such a branch, and extract_beta says so instead of returning
one.
import numpy as np
from lockkernel.cumulant import System, coherent_state_x, evolve, coherence, wineland_xi2
from lockkernel.exact import full_exact
# 8 emitters, two at each of four detunings, all starting along +x.
deltas = np.array([-1.0, -1.0, -0.3, -0.3, 0.3, 0.3, 1.0, 1.0])
chiN, times = 1.5, np.array([0.05, 0.2, 1.0])
u, count = np.unique(deltas, return_counts=True)
sysm = System(delta=u, n=count.astype(float), chiN=chiN)
states = evolve(coherent_state_x(sysm), sysm, times[-1], t_eval=times,
rtol=1e-11, atol=1e-14)
R_ex, xi_ex = full_exact(deltas, chiN, times)
for t, st, r, xi in zip(times, states, R_ex, xi_ex):
print(f"t={t:4.2f} R: cumulant {coherence(st, sysm):.6f} exact {r:.6f} "
f"xi^2: cumulant {wineland_xi2(st, sysm):.4f} exact {xi:.4f}")t=0.05 R: cumulant 0.999012 exact 0.999012 xi^2: cumulant 0.9374 exact 0.9374
t=0.20 R: cumulant 0.984309 exact 0.984316 xi^2: cumulant 0.7818 exact 0.7824
t=1.00 R: cumulant 0.674467 exact 0.677579 xi^2: cumulant 0.5328 exact 0.5771
The dynamics modules treat the conservative case as a quantum model:
two-level emitters (spin one-half) with equal all-to-all exchange
coupling and spread detunings, with no damping. The cumulant
solver follows the average of each emitter group plus the pair
correlations between emitters, and drops higher correlations. That
makes it fast for large numbers of emitters, but it is an
approximation. For small groups full_exact solves the full quantum
problem by exact diagonalisation (computing the quantum states of the
whole group directly, which is only affordable for a few emitters).
The two agree at short times and drift apart later, as a truncation
should. xi^2 is the Wineland spin-squeezing parameter:
1 for uncorrelated spins, below 1 when the spins are entangled in a way
that improves phase measurements.
The top level imports the measured names below and the submodules
lineshapes, kernels, parametric and measured. Import
lockkernel.cumulant, lockkernel.ensemble and lockkernel.exact
directly.
Line shapes and kernels (lockkernel.lineshapes, lockkernel.kernels)
LineShape-- a symmetric density with its value at the centre (p0()), and, where available, a floating-pointcdfandppf. Makers:lorentzian,gaussian,student_t,box,bimodal_gaussian;LINESHAPESmaps names to them.Kernel-- an even kernel withW(0) = 1, its tail exponent, its support,mass()andsecond_moment()(the integral ofu^2 W(u), finite only for compact support, fast decay ors > 3). Makers:conservative,kuramoto,power_tail(s),gaussian_kernel;KERNELSmaps names to them.heterogeneous(base, degree_exponent, eta=1, k_min=1)-- the kernel averaged over a power-law spread of coupling strengths (example 6).predicted_beta(s)-- the exponent the rule gives for tails(Nonemeaning no algebraic tail), for a line with a rounded top.
The exact solution (lockkernel.parametric, mpmath precision)
G_of_Omega,H_of_Omega-- the two integrals the solution is built on:G(Omega) = integral p(Omega u) W(u) duandH = Omega G, so thatchiN = 1/GandR = H.threshold,branch_point,sweep,extract_beta-- the threshold, one point(chiN, R, eps)of the branch, the branch atOmega = 10^efor a list ofe, and the local exponents along it.epsis computed fromG(0) - G(Omega)directly, so it keeps the working precision however small it is.c_coefficient,amplitude-- for the conservative kernel, the numbercwhose sign sets the order of the onset, and the amplitudeA = pi p(0)^2 / c.tail_integral,amplitude_general-- the amplitude for a kernel with tail exponent1 < s < 3.amplitude_curvature-- the amplitude whenbeta = 1/2(no tail, or a tails > 3, on a line with a rounded top; example 7).fold_interval-- samples the branch and, if it folds back, returns the coupling range of the hysteresis, the turning points and the jump inR(Noneif the branch does not fold; example 8).
Fitting measured data (lockkernel.measured, also at the top level)
fit_branch(chi, r, reference, sigma_r=None, min_decade=1.0)-- returns aBranchFitwithchi_c,beta,amplitude, their errors,n_points,eps_range,residual_rms_log(the root-mean-square misfit inlog R) andreference.kernel_tail_from_beta(beta, sigma_beta=0, n_sigma=2)-- the tail exponentsand its error.beta_relative_sigma(n_points, decades, sigma_log),points_for_beta(target_sigma_beta, decades, sigma_log)-- the error bar ofbetafor a planned measurement with the threshold known, and the number of points for a target error bar.plan_fit(n_points, eps_min, eps_max, beta, sigma_log, fit_threshold=True),points_for_fit(target_sigma_beta, eps_min, eps_max, beta, sigma_log)-- the same for the fitfit_branchactually does, with the threshold fitted:plan_fitreturns aFitPlanwithsigma_beta,sigma_chi_c_relandsigma_amplitude_rel(example 5).
Quantum spin dynamics (lockkernel.cumulant, lockkernel.ensemble,
lockkernel.exact)
System,State,coherent_state_x,evolve-- groups ("classes") of emitters with equal detuning, the cumulant state, the start with all spins along +x, and the time evolution. Emitters detuned far outside the locking range can be kept as free spins that precess exactly without being integrated, so the line's tails are not cut.evolve_meanfield-- the same with all correlations dropped.coherence(the order parameterR),wineland_xi2,collective_moments-- what is read from a state;physicalityandvalid_windowflag when the truncated state stops being physical.class_table,build_system-- turn a line shape into a finite set of detuning classes that keeps the whole population.symmetric_exact(all detunings equal, any number of emitters),full_exact(full quantum problem, up to about twelve emitters) andclass_exact(emitters grouped by detuning, a few tens) -- exact references.class_exactis not covered by the tests.
Each function's docstring (help(lockkernel.fit_branch), for example)
gives its inputs and conventions.
lockkernel raises an error instead of guessing when:
- measured data come without a
referenceof at least 8 characters saying where they come from; - fewer than 6 points are given, or
chiandrdiffer in length (three parameters with error bars need more); - the couplings are not finite and strictly increasing, or an order
parameter is not finite and positive (points below the threshold,
R = 0, carry no exponent information; drop them); sigma_ris not positive or not on the same grid asr;- the fit does not converge, or its covariance is singular (the data cannot pin down the three parameters separately);
- the fitted threshold is indistinguishable from the smallest coupling: the data do not reach the onset;
- the fitted points span less than
min_decadedecades ofeps(default one): exponent and amplitude cannot be told apart on so short a range; - a fitted
betais consistent with 1/2 (only the classs >= 3is identified), clearly below 1/2 (no kernel gives that; the fit has probably left the near-threshold range), or not positive; - a planned measurement has fewer than 3 points (6 with the threshold
fitted, as
fit_branchneeds), a non-positive or reversed range, a non-positive scatter orbeta, a non-positive target, or would need more than 10^7 points; extract_betameets a point witheps <= 0: the branch is at or below the threshold there, because it bends back (a first-order onset, example 8) or is flat (Rjumps at the threshold), and there is no exponent to measure;amplitude_curvatureis asked for a line withp''(0) >= 0(a flat top or a dip at the centre) or a kernel with tails <= 3, andsecond_momentfor a kernel with tails <= 3(it diverges);fold_intervalfinds a fold on a line with compact support (box), which it cannot refine, or cannot bracket a turning point on its grid;power_tail(s)is asked fors <= 1(the kernel mass would be infinite), orheterogeneousforgamma <= 2or a resulting tails <= 1;tail_integralis asked forsoutside1 < s < 3, where it diverges;- a line shape without a floating-point distribution
(
bimodal_gaussian) is asked forcdf,ppfor a class table; - the solver of the differential equations fails in
evolveorevolve_meanfield.
97 automated tests run on every push and pull request, on Python 3.9 to 3.14, and once more on Python 3.10 with the oldest NumPy (1.22.0), SciPy (1.8.0) and mpmath (1.2.1) the package allows. The numerical checks compare the package with something independent of it: a closed form, an exact identity, a second calculation done a different way, exact diagonalisation, or seeded simulation. The rest check that the refusals fire, plus one check of the version number and that importing the package does not import matplotlib. The main checks:
The exact solution (30 digits unless stated)
- Kernel masses:
pi(conservative) andpi/2(Kuramoto) to 1e-25;power_tail(s)fors= 1.5, 2, 3, 4 against2 (pi/s) / sin(pi/s)to 1e-14. - The Kuramoto threshold is twice the conservative one to 1e-25, on three lines.
- Conservative kernel, Lorentzian line: the branch matches
chiN = a + Omega,R = 1 - a/chiNto 1e-28 forOmegafrom 1e-1 to 1e-6. Kuramoto kernel, Lorentzian line:R = sqrt(1 - chiN_c/chiN)to 1e-26 forOmegafrom 1e-1 to 1e-4. - The amplitude takes the closed values 1,
pi/2, 4/3 andpi^2/4on Lorentzian, Gaussian, Student-t and box lines, to a relative 1e-9, and (new in 1.1.1) 1 andpi/2to a relative 1e-12 at mpmath's default 15 digits (Lorentzian lines of width 1 and 1000, and a Gaussian). cfrom its integral equals the slope ofG(Omega)/piatOmega= 1e-6 and 2e-6 to a relative 1e-9, on four lines;R/epsatOmega = 1e-6is within a relative 1e-5 of the amplitude.
New in 1.2.0 (15 digits unless stated; the references are closed forms evaluated separately from the package's integrals)
eps,chiNandRon the Lorentzian line matcheps = Omega/a,chiN = a + Omega,R = Omega/(a + Omega)to a relative 1e-13 forOmegafrom 1e-6 to 1e-14, and to 1e-28 at 30 digits down toOmega= 1e-20.- Box line, kernels
1/(1+|u|^s)withs= 1.5, 2.5, 4 and 6:Gandepsmatch the closed formG = X 2F1(1, 1/s; 1+1/s; -X^s),X = 1/Omega, to a relative 1e-13 atOmega= 1e-1, 1e-3 and 1e-5 (down toepsof about 1e-26). On this flat-topped lineextract_betagives1/(s-1)= 1/3 and 1/5 fors= 4 and 6, within 1e-6. - Two-peaked line:
c_coefficientmatches(1 - 2x D(x))/pito 1e-13 for separations 1, 2 and 4; the sign ofcflips across the separation 2.61386 (the maximum of Dawson's function, located by root finding);Gmatches the Voigt closed form to a relative 1e-13. fold_interval: every number it returns (couplings, order parameters,Omegaof the turning points and of the jump) matches the Voigt closed form, with turning points found by root finding on its derivative, to a relative 1e-12, for a branch that leaves the threshold backwards (two peaks 4 widths apart) and for an S-shaped branch (a three-peak line); it returnsNonefor a monotonic branch.extract_betarefuses the backward branch and the flat one (box line, Kuramoto kernel, whereepsis exactly 0).second_momentmatchespi/8(Kuramoto),sqrt(pi)/2(Gaussian kernel) and2 (pi/s)/sin(3 pi/s)(s= 4, 6) to 1e-12.amplitude_curvatureis 1 for the Kuramoto kernel on a Lorentzian line andsqrt(pi),sqrt(2)on Gaussian lines of two widths, to 1e-12; at 20 digits it matchesR/sqrt(eps)atOmega = 1e-6to a relative 1e-10 for three kernel-line pairs, and to 2e-6 fors = 4.
The exponent rule (25 digits, Gaussian line, Omega down to 1e-6)
beta = 1/(s-1)or 1/2 for the kernel family withs= 1.5, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.5, 4 and 6, to a relative 5e-3, 1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-3, 2e-3, 1e-4 and 1e-6 respectively. At the borderlines = 3the local exponent lies between 0.5 and 0.56.- The conservative kernel gives 1, and the Kuramoto and Gaussian
kernels give 1/2, within 1e-4 on three lines; for
s = 2.5three lines agree within 1e-3. - The general amplitude matches the branch at
Omega = 1e-7fors= 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2 (relative 1e-4, 1e-5, 1e-4) on three lines, and equals thes = 2form within a relative 1e-6. - The averaged kernel of example 6 has the tail
(gamma-2)/etaors0in five cases (within 1.5e-2 from its measured slope), and givesbeta = 1/(gamma-3)within 5e-3 forgamma = 3.8.
Fitting measured data (the theory half checks the lab half)
- On exact branches with no noise,
fit_branchrecoversbeta = 1(conservative) andbeta = 2/3(s = 2.5) within 0.02, and the threshold within a relative 1e-3;scomes back within 0.1 of 2.5. - With 2 % seeded noise, the fitted
betais within four of its own error bars of 1, between 0.9 and 1.1, with an error bar below 0.05. kernel_tail_from_beta(1.0, 0.02)returnss = 2and error 0.02 to 1e-12.- The planning formula matches 6000 seeded simulated fits within 5 %,
and
points_for_betareturns the smallestnthat meets the target (checked on both sides). - (New in 1.2.0) On noiseless data reaching
eps = 1e-7, the error barsfit_branchreports, and thoseplan_fitpredicts, equal the ones built from mpmath's numerical derivatives at 30 digits to a relative 1e-6. With the threshold known,plan_fitequalsbeta_relative_sigmato 1e-12. Over 300 seeded noisy fits (1 % scatter), the scatter ofchi_c,betaandAmatchesplan_fit, and the median reported error bar matches the scatter, within 12 %.points_for_fitis checked on both sides, and the error bar is checked to fall with every added point from 6 to 400.sigma_betaandsigma_Afromplan_fitdo not depend onbetaandsigma_chi_cscales as1/beta(to 1e-12).
Dynamics and discretisation
- Cumulant solver, all detunings equal, against the exact result:
xi^2within 0.2, 0.015 and 0.0015 for 50, 200 and 1000 emitters (andRwithin a quarter of that), with the error falling withN(more than 50 times smaller at 1000 than at 50). - Cumulant solver, 8 and 10 emitters at several detunings, against
full diagonalisation:
Rwithin 1e-7 andxi^2within 1e-4 att = 0.05; att = 0.2the difference is larger but below 1e-2. - The equations keep the exact symmetries of the pair correlations to
a relative 1e-12, and an uncorrelated start gives
xi^2 = 1andR = 1to 1e-12. - The class table keeps the whole population (sums to 1 within 1e-12) and reproduces the locking integral within 0.2 %.
- Mean-field dynamics on a Lorentzian line settles at
R = 1 - 1/rwithin 5e-3 for couplingsr= 1.2, 2 and 3 times the threshold, and stays below 0.05 at 0.6 times the threshold.
Not covered by tests: class_exact, physicality and
valid_window.
1.2.0 fixed four silent inaccuracies. Numbers below are at mpmath's default 15 digits unless stated.
branch_pointformedepsaschiN/chiN_c - 1and lost aboutlog10(1/eps)digits: on the Lorentzian lineepswas 2e-4 (relative) off atOmega = 1e-9and wrong by a factor of about 220 at1e-12.G_of_Omegaitself was 4e-10 off atOmega = 1e-12, because a segment spanning many decades was integrated on a linear scale. On the box line withs = 4,extract_betaquoted 0.3194 instead of 1/3, and withs = 6it raisedZeroDivisionError. Both quantities now keep the working precision (see the new checks above). The earlier tests and examples ran at 20 to 30 digits withepsno smaller than about 1e-12, where the loss did not show: all of them still pass unchanged, and README examples 1, 2, 3, 6 and 9 print the same as before.extract_betareturned slopes close to 1 (1.0016, 1.00016, 1.000016 forOmega= 1e-3 down to 1e-6, at 20 digits) for the backward branch of the two-peaked line (a first-order onset,eps < 0), and raisedZeroDivisionErroron a flat branch. It now refuses both.fit_branchtook its derivatives by finite differences, which near the threshold are not small steps: with points down toeps = 1e-7it reportedsigma_chi_cabout 17 % andsigma_betaabout 2 % too small, and on example 4's data the fit stopped marginally short of the least-squares minimum. It now uses exact derivatives. In example 4 the threshold error bar goes from 3.5e-9 to 3.8e-9 (beta 0.67322 -> 0.67325, its error bar 0.00275 -> 0.00279).fold_interval, for a branch that leaves the threshold backwards, returned the first grid point instead of the threshold as the end of the low branch (5.89464 instead of 5.89561 in example 8, and so a jump to 0.84800 instead of 0.84805). A turning point it could not refine was silently replaced by a grid point; it now raises. It is also much faster: on the line of example 8 withn = 60and the default range it took 79 s in 1.1.1 and takes 3.5 s now (17 s at the defaultn = 400).
1.1.1 fixed the amplitude at ordinary precision.
c_coefficient (and so amplitude) lost about 40 digits to a
cancellation near the centre of the line. At mpmath's default 15
digits, amplitude(lorentzian()) returned about 0.0005 instead of 1;
at 20 digits it was off by about 0.16 %; a Lorentzian 1000 wide lost
digits even at 30. The tests ran at 30 digits with a unit-width line
and did not see it. The integral now runs with 25 extra digits, and a
test at 15 digits was added. If you computed amplitudes or c below
30 digits with 1.1.0 or earlier, please re-run them.
1.1.1 also corrects this README: several tolerances it quoted were not
the ones the tests use, it described class_exact as tested, and the
CI did not run Python 3.10. The full history is in
CHANGELOG.md.
- The power law
R ~ eps^betais the leading behaviour near the onset. Data taken far above it bend away and biasbeta. The one-decade rule and the residuals guard the fit, not your choice of range. - The fit's error bars are the standard asymptotic ones; they are right when the power law holds and the noise estimate is right.
extract_betaconverges slowly nears = 3, where the exponent carries logarithmic corrections.- The rule
beta = 1/2fors >= 3(andpredicted_beta,kernel_tail_from_beta,amplitude_curvature) assumes a line with a rounded top,p''(0) < 0. On a line that is flat at the centre, asboxis, a tail givesbeta = 1/(s-1)for everys > 1, and a kernel without a tail gives a jump. A measuredbetabelow 1/2 is refused bykernel_tail_from_beta, although a flat-topped line can produce one. plan_fitgives the asymptotic error bars, exact to first order in the noise. They were checked against simulated fits at 1 % scatter; at much larger scatter the real fit can do worse.- In the undamped spin model the truncated cumulant equations become
unstable at long times; check
physicality/valid_windowbefore trusting a long run. The time-averaged kernel is an assumption, checked against the full dynamics (the mean-field tests above), not a theorem. c_coefficientandamplitudeare good to about 20 significant digits at most, however highmp.dpsis set: the integral leaves out the first 1e-20 line widths next to the centre, a piece of relative size about 1e-20.fold_intervalfinds a fold only if its grid shows it: structure belowOmega = 10^loor narrower than the grid spacing is missed, and with several folds only the first and last turning points are used. It needs a differentiable line. It costsnplus about 40 high-precision integrals (about 17 s at the defaultn = 400on the two-peaked line).Kernel.mass()integrates slow tails numerically: forpower_tail(1.5)it is about 2e-10 (relative) off at 15 digits and 5e-18 at 30. This entersthreshold(noteps, whose integral treats the tail separately).build_system's docstring refers to a convergence check inscripts/vlasov_check.py; that script belongs to the research repository and is not part of this package.
This package is the maintained distribution of the reference
implementation for the locking-kernel universality study
(Tanvir-Mahmud-Mahim/locking-kernel-universality,
concept DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22696369),
whose scripts, archived run records and figures remain with the
study. The core modules were carried over unchanged in v1.1.0 (1.1.1
changes only c_coefficient; 1.2.0 changes how G, eps and the
fold are computed, and adds amplitude_curvature and
Kernel.second_moment); the measured module and the packaging are
new here. Copyright as in NOTICE.
If lockkernel helps your work, please cite it with the concept DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22829483,
which always resolves to the latest release; every release is archived
on Zenodo. CITATION.cff has the details.
Written and maintained by Tanvir Mahmud Mahim (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, BRAC University), who reviews every change and takes the final decision on scope and releases. Design questions are discussed in the open in issues and pull requests, and the standing rule of CONTRIBUTING.md binds the maintainer exactly as it binds contributors: a change that touches the physics arrives with a test, and a claim arrives with its source.
Support runs through the issue tracker. Usage questions are welcome alongside bug reports; a docstring that left a unit or a convention unclear is treated as a documentation bug, not user error.