Skip to content

Correct the hand edits on insight #3 - #328

Merged
oblomov-dev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/funny-clarke-8i7ydw
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

oblomov-dev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/funny-clarke-8i7ydw

Conversation

@oblomov-dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to the direct edit in e02918d. Four corrections and the line wrapping that came with it.

Corrections

was is
Typo thant can be that can be
Apostrophe, dash call - so lets check the possibilities we get next: call — so let's look at what that makes possible:
Grammar somebody wrote in 2000s somebody wrote in the 2000s
Missing connective see below see below

The only one that is not mechanical: "This gets called programming model agnostic, and that phrase is too small for it" became "This could be called programming model agnostic." — which dropped the bridge between the label and the argument against it, so the paragraph asserted the term and then contradicted it with nothing in between. The softer "could be called" stays; one word puts the logic back:

This could be called programming model agnostic — except RAP is a programming model, and a MODIFY is not, a BAPI is not, …

Wrapping

Three edited paragraphs came back as single long lines (the first at 140 characters). Invisible in the editor, but in a diff the whole paragraph is then one changed line, so every later correction to it reads as a rewrite. Wrapped back to the column the rest of the file is set in.

Left as written

The closing Give abap2UI5 a try. 🦖🦕🦣. #1 and #2 both close on a call to action, #1 already carries an emoji in its prose, and the three decades of ABAP above it are what the joke is about.

One thing for the author to decide rather than for this PR: the call to action now stands after the closing line One class, no programming model, and no opinion about what is behind the screen., which was built as the last word because it echoes the title. #2 has it the other way round — call to action first, then the kicker. The order is left exactly as edited.

Gates

test (251), check:conventions, check:playground, check:examples, check:api-names, check:api-reference and docs:build pass locally.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_0182AiPodwfGRKPNZG9D5epe


Generated by Claude Code

Four things from the direct edit, and the wrapping they came with:

- "thant can be" -> "that can be".
- "so lets check" -> "so let's look at what that makes possible", and the
  hyphen before it is the em dash the rest of the page uses.
- "somebody wrote in 2000s" -> "in the 2000s".
- "This could be called programming model agnostic. RAP is a programming
  model. A MODIFY is not" lost the connective between the label and the
  argument against it, so the paragraph asserted the term and then
  contradicted it with nothing in between. "- except RAP is a programming
  model, and a MODIFY is not" keeps the softer "could be called" and puts
  the logic back in one word.

Three edited paragraphs had been rewritten as single long lines; they are
wrapped back to the column the rest of the file is set in.

Left as written: the closing "Give abap2UI5 a try" and its dinosaurs. A
call to action is what #1 and #2 close on too, and the three decades of
ABAP above it are what the joke is about.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0182AiPodwfGRKPNZG9D5epe
@oblomov-dev
oblomov-dev merged commit 8a4e227 into main Sep 21, 2026
1 check passed
@oblomov-dev
oblomov-dev deleted the claude/funny-clarke-8i7ydw branch September 21, 2026 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants