fix(parser): read replyTo from SES common headers - #8525
Open
LuisFigueroaG wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
LuisFigueroaG wants to merge 1 commit into
LuisFigueroaG wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Issue number: closes #8523
Summary
Changes
The SES parser model declared the
reply_toalias asreply-to, but SES sendsreplyToincommonHeaders, which the SES data class already reads. The alias is nowreplyTo. Added a test that checkscc,bcc,senderandreply_toare parsed. Thereply_toassertion fails ondevelop.User experience
Before:
SesModelalways returnedreply_to=None.After:
reply_tocontains the Reply-To addresses, consistent withSESEvent.By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.