Show neutral dismissal notes and fictional examples in Inline Decisions

README.md

@@ -156,11 +156,7 @@ Install: `bb plugin install git:https://github.com/brsbl/bb-plugins.git@plugin/i
 
 Answer everything agents need from you in Waiting on you, a drawer above the prompt box that collects decisions, email replies and plain questions from every thread, urgent first. Track past choices and results in the Decision log.
 
-![Minimal cards](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/692e0678-252d-47cf-8e1f-01e2b5c3fa7e)
-
-![Action table and results](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec63ecfe-86ad-4a46-8f6e-06a72e8923f0)
-
-![Mixed table with one reply expanded](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4eef8810-5a99-40af-8fa4-974d25f6937f)
+![A sample decision open in Waiting on you, with its context, both options, Recommended and Submit](plugins/inline-action-cards/docs/decision-in-thread.png)
 
 [Source](plugins/inline-action-cards) · [README](plugins/inline-action-cards/README.md)
 

plugins/inline-action-cards/README.md

@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
 # Inline Decisions
 
-Answer everything agents need from you in one place: **Waiting on you**, a drawer above the prompt box that collects decisions, email replies and plain questions from every thread.
+Answer everything agents need from you in one place: **Waiting on you**, a drawer above the prompt box that collects decisions, email replies and plain questions from the active thread.
 
-![Minimal cards](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/692e0678-252d-47cf-8e1f-01e2b5c3fa7e)
+![A sample Workshop plan thread with the decision "Use the garden room for the workshop?" open in Waiting on you, showing its context, both options, Recommended and Submit](docs/decision-in-thread.png)
+
+![The answered decision settled in the thread: Decision: Use garden room, with the agent's reply](docs/decision-result.png)
+
+![Waiting on you expanded with two sample asks, the urgent packing checklist question first](docs/waiting-drawer.png)
+
+![The Decision log with the checklist ask still waiting and the room result plus two dismissed asks in Done](docs/decision-log.png)
 
 ## Install
 

plugins/inline-action-cards/app.test.tsx

@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ it("dismisses a waiting item from the Decision log with a reason, telling its th
     const reason = screen.getByRole("textbox", { name: "Reason (optional)" });
     fireEvent.change(reason, { target: { value: "Paused the campaign" } });
     fireEvent.keyDown(reason, { key: "Enter" });
-    await waitFor(() => expect(submittedMessages).toEqual(["brsbl dismissed: Raise the ads budget · Paused the campaign"]));
+    await waitFor(() => expect(submittedMessages).toEqual(["Dismissed: Raise the ads budget · Paused the campaign"]));
     const saved = JSON.parse((await host.harness.behavior.runCli(["get", "budget", "--thread", "thr_test"])).stdout!);
     expect(saved).toMatchObject({ state: "succeeded", attempt: null, result: { message: "Dismissed · Paused the campaign" }, dismissed: { reason: "Paused the campaign" } });
     const context = JSON.parse((await host.harness.registrations.mentionProviders[0]!.resolve(submittedMentions[0]!.id)).context);

plugins/inline-action-cards/package.json

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
   "files": [
     "assets",
     "dist",
+    "docs",
     "README.md",
     "skills"
   ],

plugins/inline-action-cards/server.test.ts

@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ describe("dismissing", () => {
     const item = await host.harness.behavior.callRpc("dismiss", { threadId: ref.threadId, id: "channel", revision: 1, reason: "Not needed" }) as Item;
     expect(item).toMatchObject({ state: "succeeded", attempt: null, result: { message: "Dismissed · Not needed", retryable: false }, dismissed: { reason: "Not needed" } });
     expect(host.harness.sdk.callsTo("threads.send")).toHaveLength(1);
-    expect(host.harness.sdk.callsTo("threads.send")[0]![0]).toMatchObject({ threadId: ref.threadId, input: [{ text: "brsbl dismissed: Which channel · Not needed" }] });
+    expect(host.harness.sdk.callsTo("threads.send")[0]![0]).toMatchObject({ threadId: ref.threadId, input: [{ text: "Dismissed: Which channel · Not needed" }] });
     expect(await host.harness.behavior.callRpc("waiting", { threadId: ref.threadId })).toEqual([]);
     const context = JSON.parse((await host.harness.registrations.mentionProviders[0]!.resolve(`${ref.threadId}:channel:dismissed`)).context);
     expect(context).toMatchObject({ intent: "dismissed", question: "Which channel?", reason: "Not needed" });
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ describe("dismissing", () => {
     await Promise.all(retries);
     const sends = host.harness.sdk.callsTo("threads.send");
     expect(sends).toHaveLength(2);
-    expect(sends[1]![0]).toMatchObject({ input: [{ text: "brsbl dismissed: Which channel" }] });
+    expect(sends[1]![0]).toMatchObject({ input: [{ text: "Dismissed: Which channel" }] });
     const settled = await callRpc("notifyDismissed", { threadId: ref.threadId, id: "notice" }) as Item;
     expect(settled).toMatchObject({ state: "succeeded", attempt: null, dismissed: { notice: "sent" } });
     expect(settled.dismissed).not.toHaveProperty("noticeError");

plugins/inline-action-cards/server.ts

@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ export default function plugin(bb: BbPluginApi): void {
     const item = store.claimNotice(threadId, id);
     if (!item) return store.get(threadId, id);
     const label = title(item).replace(/[?\s]+$/, "");
-    const prefix = "brsbl dismissed: ";
+    const prefix = "Dismissed: ";
     const reason = item.dismissed?.reason;
     try {
       await bb.sdk.threads.send({ threadId, mode: "queue-if-active", input: [{

plugins/inline-action-cards/skills/inline-action-cards/SKILL.md

@@ -58,15 +58,15 @@ If a card needs more than that, the decision is too big: split it, or, when the
 
 Bad cards:
 
-- “Run the code review on the Live Markdown stack?” A routine step; just do it.
+- “Run the code review on the sample change?” A routine step; just do it.
 - “Approve the claim lines on the comparison page?” It needs a careful read, so ask for a review instead.
 - “Cancel the stray trial yourself, then reply done.” An agent with browser access can do it.
 - “Unlist the theme after the takedown request?” when the user has never heard of the request.
 - “Which type direction should we use?” with four names and no images of them.
 - “Move the trip two days later?” with no fares for either option and the wrong number of travelers.
 - “Approve?” with a five-bullet What/Why now/Options/Recommendation/Next brief: busy, and the user doesn't read it.
 
-**Good:** “Merge the Live Markdown stack?” once its required checks pass; labels “Merge both PRs” / “Keep them open”; `recommended: "yes"`; context “[Checks and review](https://example.com/checks) passed on the final heads.”
+**Good (fictional example):** question “Use the Moonbase Garden Club’s draft as the planting plan?”; labels “Use this plan” / “Revise it first”; `recommended: "yes"`; context “The club needs the plan by Friday.”
 
 Every example in this skill is illustrative. Use verified facts, include the exact head when approval depends on a revision, and never claim a gate passed because an example says so.