PR #25's Copilot overview repeatedly reports five moderate concerns, but its actionable output contains two resolved inline findings and two concrete summary examples now addressed in the plan. A later round reports no findings while retaining the generic count. This is an evidence-reconciliation follow-up, not five confirmed defects.
Before starting the affected integration lanes, check the published plan against the following concrete acceptance matrix:
- every edited shared path has exactly one owner, including D's dedicated workflow exception;
- F1 publishes legal state transitions and state-holder ownership before implementation;
- D/F settlement rejects stale attempts and validates both durable and visible state;
- K3 preserves the reviewed head, disables queued actions and waits for confirmed terminal status;
- each split T-ID is complete only when every assigned slice's original acceptance checks pass.
Record a specific counterexample and focused fix for any mismatch. If all checks hold and no additional examples are supplied, close this as no reproducible gap; do not expand product scope or repeatedly patch unspecified summary wording. Existing execution work remains in #22 and #24.
PR #25's Copilot overview repeatedly reports five moderate concerns, but its actionable output contains two resolved inline findings and two concrete summary examples now addressed in the plan. A later round reports no findings while retaining the generic count. This is an evidence-reconciliation follow-up, not five confirmed defects.
Before starting the affected integration lanes, check the published plan against the following concrete acceptance matrix:
Record a specific counterexample and focused fix for any mismatch. If all checks hold and no additional examples are supplied, close this as no reproducible gap; do not expand product scope or repeatedly patch unspecified summary wording. Existing execution work remains in #22 and #24.