Skip to content

Refresh status records after F6 and the closed lane issues - #182

Merged
mchwang merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
docs/status-refresh
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

mchwang merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
docs/status-refresh

Conversation

@mchwang

@mchwang mchwang commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Documentation only. The status records still described the pre-merge automation (#22) as unfinished and lane F as the next step. F3–F6 have merged, T9 is complete (#178), and #22 is closed.

Tracking issues closed earlier today, each with an evidence comment: #28 (lane D), #29 (lane E), #66 (PRs #85, #90), #88 (PR #134).

Validation

  • git diff --check passes on every commit. No test or script reads these docs.
  • Every cited PR and issue number was checked against GitHub. All 19 cited test titles exist word for word, and their bodies were read.

Review record

Base eafe2be throughout. Each independent pass was a fresh general-purpose subagent reviewing the full diff, with no author context.

Round Head Findings What changed
Independent 1 1ef15ed 5: "every T9 suite on every PR" overstates (live probes are nightly); lane F listed done though review rounds are not built; sequencing paragraph still pending; README button name; chained "and" All fixed in 00816bb
Independent 2 00816bb 4 + nits: T3/T6/T7/T11/T12 unticked while step 4 said Done; arch "no buttons" vs Merge PR; Approve & merge naming; missing step list/Cancel; F6a PR number; tense Clause-by-clause test audit: T3/T7/T11 ticked with evidence, T6/T12 kept open with gaps, step 4 changed to "mostly done" (06dbcdf)
Independent 3 06dbcdf 3: sequencing paragraph said step 4 complete; stale "current work" line; T7 base-race evidence Fixed in aaa6264
Independent 4 aaa6264 3: replacing the refusal is runner-only; T6 evidence lacked the no-merge test; T7 head-only test Fixed in ac8afcb
Independent 5 ac8afcb 3: step 4 open-item lists differed; Flow 3 described only the direct merge; browser also sends an action ID Fixed in c2a8d01
Independent 6 c2a8d01 3 wording: T11 fake-resolver caveat, T12 output source, T7 refusal caveat Fixed in 4ce6605; for T7, simulated base refusals cited instead of the suggested wording, because they exist (merge-job.test.ts, pre-merge.test.ts)
Independent 7 4ce6605 1: T11 caveat missed ledger-seeded tests Fixed in a404a0e
Independent 8 a404a0e No findings Clean pass; authorizes the Copilot request on a404a0e

Nothing was declined.

Review-lesson audit

  • Overstated or stale status claims (rounds 1–7): covered by the existing rule "Treat every behavioural claim the change makes … as something to verify" (CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, Review readiness).
  • Ticking T items without Verify-clause evidence (round 2): covered by the design's own rule "An increment must not mark a broader requirement complete while any of its acceptance criteria remain deferred".
  • No new AGENTS.md rule is needed.

Deferred follow-ups

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

mchwang and others added 8 commits October 20, 2026 09:02
The README, architecture overview and design plan still described the
pre-merge automation (#22) as unfinished and lane F as next. F3-F6 have
merged, T9 is complete and #22 is closed, so record that and bump the
architecture status line to eafe2be.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…se sequencing

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The second independent review found the build-step-4 'Done' claim
contradicted the unticked T items. A clause-by-clause test audit shows
T6 and T12 still have unverified Verify clauses (and #176), so build
step 4 is mostly done, not done. Also name the Merge PR button in the
architecture overview.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…dence

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The documentation-only changes reflect completed work and explicitly retain outstanding limitations, with no unresolved findings.

No open issues 🎉

What changed in this PR

Updates documentation to reflect completed pre-merge automation while preserving known limitations and verification gaps.

Changes:

  • Documents the runner’s one-click Merge PR workflow.
  • Refreshes lane F, milestone, and closed-issue status.
  • Records T3, T7, and T11 evidence while keeping T6 and T12 open.
File Description
README.md Updates the feature status and merge workflow.
docs/​designs/​codeboost-plan-indexed-review.md Refreshes milestones, task evidence, and remaining gaps.
docs/​architecture.md Updates runner status, merge flow, and follow-ups.

Review effort: Balanced

@mchwang
mchwang merged commit 42abf4a into main Oct 20, 2026
3 checks passed
@mchwang
mchwang deleted the docs/status-refresh branch October 20, 2026 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants