Repository navigation
Refresh status records after F6 and the closed lane issues - #182
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The README, architecture overview and design plan still described the pre-merge automation (#22) as unfinished and lane F as next. F3-F6 have merged, T9 is complete and #22 is closed, so record that and bump the architecture status line to eafe2be. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…se sequencing Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The second independent review found the build-step-4 'Done' claim contradicted the unticked T items. A clause-by-clause test audit shows T6 and T12 still have unverified Verify clauses (and #176), so build step 4 is mostly done, not done. Also name the Merge PR button in the architecture overview. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…dence Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The documentation-only changes reflect completed work and explicitly retain outstanding limitations, with no unresolved findings.
No open issues 🎉
What changed in this PR
Updates documentation to reflect completed pre-merge automation while preserving known limitations and verification gaps.
Changes:
- Documents the runner’s one-click Merge PR workflow.
- Refreshes lane F, milestone, and closed-issue status.
- Records T3, T7, and T11 evidence while keeping T6 and T12 open.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Updates the feature status and merge workflow. |
| docs/designs/codeboost-plan-indexed-review.md | Refreshes milestones, task evidence, and remaining gaps. |
| docs/architecture.md | Updates runner status, merge flow, and follow-ups. |
Review effort: Balanced
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Documentation only. The status records still described the pre-merge automation (#22) as unfinished and lane F as the next step. F3–F6 have merged, T9 is complete (#178), and #22 is closed.
README.md: the status line lists the one-click merge job. With a runner, the Merge PR button pushes the rebased head, waits for required checks and hands the exact pair to the guarded merge.docs/architecture.md:eafe2be(2026-10-20). "Partly built for pre-merge automation" becomes "In use".docs/designs/codeboost-plan-indexed-review.md:cmd:items are ticked with their PRs; "validate the complete pre-merge sequence" stays open.cmd:checks run again on a head-only collaborator push, or that rule sources are read again when SHAs match. T12 uses hand-written output rather than recorded gh output, and App-pinned required checks always read as missing #176 breaks app-pinned checks.Tracking issues closed earlier today, each with an evidence comment: #28 (lane D), #29 (lane E), #66 (PRs #85, #90), #88 (PR #134).
Validation
git diff --checkpasses on every commit. No test or script reads these docs.Review record
Base
eafe2bethroughout. Each independent pass was a fresh general-purpose subagent reviewing the full diff, with no author context.1ef15ed00816bb00816bb06dbcdf)06dbcdfaaa6264aaa6264ac8afcbac8afcbc2a8d01c2a8d014ce6605; for T7, simulated base refusals cited instead of the suggested wording, because they exist (merge-job.test.ts,pre-merge.test.ts)4ce6605a404a0ea404a0ea404a0eNothing was declined.
Review-lesson audit
AGENTS.mdrule is needed.Deferred follow-ups
🤖 Generated with Claude Code