OVS 3.0: SD-3427: Improve facilityTypeCode description - #654
Conversation
PR Summary by QodoClarify PBPL timestamp compatibility for pre-3.0.2 consumers
AI Description
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (1)
|
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require reviewTip of the day💡 Did you know, you can type 'qodo, fix this' on a finding and the fix lands right on your PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
The new API-Version request-header wording is ambiguous versus the existing response-header definition and should be clarified to avoid implementer confusion.
Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the OVS 3.0.3 OpenAPI specification text to clarify backwards-compatibility behavior around Timestamp.facilityTypeCode=PBPL when interacting with consumers using API versions older than 3.0.2.
Changes:
- Expanded the
API-Versionheader parameter description to include consumer-version-based compatibility rules for omittingTimestampentries withfacilityTypeCode=PBPL. - Added an explicit backwards-compatibility note to the
facilityTypeCodeschema description reiterating the required omission behavior for older consumer versions.
File summaries
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| ovs/v3/OVS_v3.0.3.yaml | Clarifies API-Version header semantics and PBPL/Timestamp backwards-compatibility expectations in the OVS 3.0.3 spec. |
Review details
- Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
- Comments generated: 1
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
SD-3427: Clarify which 3.0.2 timestamps to send to "early" adopters