Repository navigation
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
🤖 Review(中文)基于提交: 概要:本 PR 仅修改 我核对了几点:
建议(均为非阻塞的小问题):
结论:文档准确、与 core 政策一致,可以合并;以上建议可酌情采纳。 |
🤖 Review (English)Based on commit: Summary: This PR only touches What I verified:
Suggestions (all minor, non-blocking):
Verdict: Accurate and consistent with the core policy; fine to merge. Take the suggestions as you see fit. |
🤖 レビュー(日本語)対象コミット: 概要:本 PR は 確認した点:
提案(いずれも軽微で、ブロッカーではありません):
結論:内容は正確で core のポリシーとも一致しており、マージして問題ありません。提案は必要に応じて取り入れてください。 |
Summary
Related: #153 (policy wording updated; issue remains open).
Scope
Documentation only: no UI engine, dependency, runtime, version, tag, or npm publication changes.
Validation
git diff --check: passed.node --test scripts/test-publish.mjs: 383/383 passed.668be618(Node 22.22.3/24 source suites, four packed consumers, accessibility smoke and lint).e10e6db: split policy into UI/core/published-artifact bullets, link core's canonical support guide, and remove PR-only wording. The future-release qualifier remains explicit.Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need.Note
Cursor Bugbot is generating a summary for commit 668be61. Configure here.