Skip to content

T. in empty cell test should not spawn threads. #135

Closed

Description

@rdm

Activity

  1. moon-chilled commented on Apr 27, 2022

    @moon-chilled
    Contributor

    I suggest that a general mechanism be devised, by which a user verb is also able to detect such a situation and perhaps skip side effects.

  2. rdm commented on Apr 28, 2022

    @rdm
    ContributorAuthor

    Something like returnifempty. keyword? Or maybe dolittle. would be more poetic...

    That said, adding to the language's vocabulary is out of scope here. This particular issue is about addressing an issue with the threading vocabulary.

    A proposal for new vocabulary should belong in a different issue, where it could be discussed and treated adequately.

  3. HenryHRich commented on Mar 31, 2026

    @HenryHRich
    Contributor

    The issue is execution on fill-cells, nothing specific to T. . You can use ^:(*@#@]) to suppress execution on empty, or use u&.> which does not bother with execution on a fill-cell

  4. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Mar 31, 2026
  5. converted this issue into a discussion #261 on Mar 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions