You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
T. in empty cell test should not spawn threads. #135
The issue is execution on fill-cells, nothing specific to T. . You can use ^:(*@#@]) to suppress execution on empty, or use u&.> which does not bother with execution on a fill-cell
Activity
moon-chilled commentedon Apr 27, 2022
I suggest that a general mechanism be devised, by which a user verb is also able to detect such a situation and perhaps skip side effects.
rdm commentedon Apr 28, 2022
Something like returnifempty. keyword? Or maybe dolittle. would be more poetic...
That said, adding to the language's vocabulary is out of scope here. This particular issue is about addressing an issue with the threading vocabulary.
A proposal for new vocabulary should belong in a different issue, where it could be discussed and treated adequately.
HenryHRich commentedon Mar 31, 2026
The issue is execution on fill-cells, nothing specific to T. . You can use ^:(*@#@]) to suppress execution on empty, or use u&.> which does not bother with execution on a fill-cell