Skip to content

Add regional browsers to pricing page - #536

Open
juecd wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cj/regional-browsers-pricing
Open

Add regional browsers to pricing page#536
juecd wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cj/regional-browsers-pricing

Conversation

@juecd

@juecd juecd commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only updates to the pricing page with no product or billing code changes.

Overview
Documents regional browsers on the pricing page: a new Managed infrastructure table row shows the feature on Start-Up and Enterprise only (not Developer/Hobbyist).

Adds an FAQ accordion “What do regional browsers cost?” stating they bill at the same usage rates as default US browsers. Also fixes accordion markup by properly closing the Managed Auth section before the new FAQ entry.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6e0fc67. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Kernel 🟢 Ready View Preview Sep 1, 2026, 2:50 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk Assessment: Very Low

Decision: Approve

What changed

Inspected the merge-base diff independently (info/pricing.mdx only, +4 / −0).

  1. Adds a Regional browsers row to the Managed infrastructure feature table ( / / / ).
  2. Adds a FAQ accordion stating regional browsers use the same usage rates as default US browsers.
  3. Closes the existing Managed Auth accordion before the new FAQ so the markup stays valid.

No other files, config, navigation, calculator, CI, or product/billing code paths are in this diff.

Why Very Low

  • Documentation-only MDX copy on a single page
  • No production logic, auth, billing systems, permissions, or infrastructure
  • No shared libraries or runtime behavior change
  • Small, isolated, easy to revert
  • No CODEOWNERS file; no code-owner review is required
  • No prior approvals to preserve or dismiss

This is user-facing pricing copy, so plan-availability and rate claims still need a human content check, but that does not raise structural or operational risk.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant