[kixelated]

Plans the follow-ups that merge agents reported during a 25-PR /quest-complete run on 2026-10-28.

Quests

m0/helpers, ranked first:

• quest merge --land gaps [M]:
  • squash on its own when that's the only method allowed;
  • accept a PR URL outside a checkout;
  • release the label after a direct merge;
  • warn when auto-merge outlives the head it was enabled on.
• Visible merge-driver fallback [S]: the fallback warns, and this repo's dev shell provides a pinned quest.
• Review rules [S]:
  • an identical diff keeps its review;
  • a finding a maintainer declined doesn't block Codex's clean review;
  • a stalled review goes to the maintainer.

m0:

• Agent test environment [XS].
• Bun EFAULT report [XS]: waits on Bun. Posting to oven-sh/bun is approved.
• Gate admission on CI [S].

m1:

• Gate ownership everywhere [M].
• Fewer git processes on Windows [S].
• Worker dev setup gains the seeded server's static assets.

Already planned: quest land on main is land-adopt, and only its setup remains (the maintainer's part).

Decisions (maintainer, 2026-10-28)

Auto-merge carry-over guard

• ✅ A skill rule plus a status warning
• Rule only
• quest disables auto-merge itself

Merge driver

• ✅ Warn on fallback
• ✅ The dev shell provides quest
• quest init writes an absolute path

Review rules

• ✅ An identical diff counts
• ✅ A declined finding doesn't block Codex's clean review
• ✅ A stalled review goes to the maintainer

Gate follow-ups

• ✅ Admission in m0, the rest in m1
• All in m1
• Admission only

Agent test environment

• ✅ An XS quest in m0
• Drop

Dev server static assets

• ✅ Fold into worker-dev
• A quest of its own
• Drop

Bun EFAULT

• ✅ A waiting quest; posting is approved
• Drop

Windows git processes

• ✅ An m1 quest
• Drop

Minor items: ✅ Drop all: ubuntu queue latency, the check closure shadowing in service.ts, detecting a shared hold token, and pinning the base SHA.

Checks

quest check passes, and so does Prettier.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

(written by Claude Opus 5.5)

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T19:38:31.645330Z	6de8488	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T19:39:05.559655Z	6de8488	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[kixelated]

Automated review by review (OpenAI)

Reviewed commit: 6de8488

No actionable bugs found in this planning-only change. The follow-ups are sensibly separated by outcome, with existing Worker setup work extended instead of duplicated. Keeping a pinned, non-checkout merge-driver executable and diagnosing CI admission before selecting a fix are sound directions. The auto-merge proposal is explicitly a skill rule plus reporting, not an enforced head lock; implementation and documentation should preserve that distinction.

Verification limits: static inspection of the changed plans, PR decisions, and surrounding merge/landing and Worker-setup documents. No runtime fixes are implemented here. I did not run checks, reproduce platform failures, or independently verify the reported formatting/quest-check results.

[kixelated]

Merging as is. No changes were made during /quest-merge.

• Codex reviewed head 6de8488 with no findings (👍 and a completed summary), and required checks pass.
• quest check --base origin/main --branch quest-plan/complete-follow-ups: 51 documents ok.
• The maintainer's decisions from the 2026-10-28 interview stand as recorded in the body.

(written by Claude Opus 5.5)