Skip to content

chore: Document the async-dynamodb extra in the README - #514

Merged
jsonbailey merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jb/sdk-60/readme-async-dynamodb
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

jsonbailey merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jb/sdk-60/readme-async-dynamodb

Conversation

@jsonbailey

@jsonbailey jsonbailey commented Sep 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overview

Async DynamoDB uses a separate async-dynamodb extra (aioboto3), distinct from the synchronous dynamodb extra. The README's async persistent-store note only covered async Redis; this adds the DynamoDB equivalent so users install the right extra:

pip install launchdarkly-server-sdk[async,async-dynamodb]

Part of the async SDK documentation follow-up (SDK-2879). The async surface shipped experimentally in 9.17.0.


Note

Overview
Extends the Async support caution/note block so DynamoDB persistent stores are covered alongside the existing Redis guidance.

The new note states that async DynamoDB needs the async-dynamodb optional extra (aioboto3), not the synchronous dynamodb extra, and shows pip install launchdarkly-server-sdk[async,async-dynamodb] so users avoid installing the wrong dependency when using AsyncLDClient with DynamoDB.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 09e5158. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Async DynamoDB uses a separate 'async-dynamodb' extra (aioboto3), distinct
from the synchronous 'dynamodb' extra; note it alongside the async Redis note.
@jsonbailey
jsonbailey marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2026 13:22
@jsonbailey
jsonbailey requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2026 13:22
@jsonbailey jsonbailey changed the title docs: Document the async-dynamodb extra in the README chore: Document the async-dynamodb extra in the README Sep 3, 2026
@jsonbailey
jsonbailey merged commit 6a8541f into main Sep 3, 2026
8 checks passed
@jsonbailey
jsonbailey deleted the jb/sdk-60/readme-async-dynamodb branch September 3, 2026 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants