[loonghao]

Summary

Two things: fix a build-breaking interaction introduced by #445, and correct
three comment counts that were measured wrong.

The bug. #445 wired scripts/generate_llms.py --check into the Python package workflow. The Version: line in the generated files is the newest git
tag, so it changes as soon as a release lands while the committed file still
carries the previous release. Every release therefore turned main and all
pull requests red until the bot's docs/update-llms-txt pull request was
merged by hand. Reproduced by adding a local v0.25.1 tag, which flipped the
check from exit 0 to exit 1.

Comparison now drops the Version: line on both sides. Everything else —
README, examples, module index — still fails, which is the gate's actual job.
Version lag keeps converging the way it already did, through the llms-txt
job's pull request; this only stops it from being a build failure.

Behaviour, verified

Change	Before	After
Only Version: differs (new tag)	exit 1	exit 0
Hand-edited Version: line	exit 1	exit 0
Any other line differs	exit 1	exit 1

The first row was verified with a real local v0.25.1 tag (since removed), not
by reasoning about the code. The last row was verified in CI: PR #448 added content drift
to llms.txt on a scratch branch, and run 38477580289
shows ruff check / ruff format passing ("All checks passed!") followed by
##[error]llms.txt are out of date; run scripts/generate_llms.py → exit 1 →
build red. That scratch PR and its branch were closed and deleted.

The bot pull-request mechanism is unchanged: the generator still writes the new
version and the llms-txt job still opens a pull request for it. Only the gate
stopped caring.

Documented in the module docstring and at the workflow step, so the next reader
does not mistake a passing check with a mismatched version for a bug.

Comment counts corrected

Measured against this tree, all three with ruff 0.16.9:

• 864 is the "no convention" count, not pep257. Measured: 864 with no
  convention set, 804 under convention = "pep257", 665 under the committed
  convention = "google". The comment said pep257.
• The baseline is 507 / 158 / 0, not "507 inside the CI lint scope":
  507 in photoshop/, 158 in test/, 0 in scripts/. The lint scope was
  photoshop alone when the baseline was written, so 507 was the whole CI
  scope at the time; it is photoshop test scripts now, which is all 665.
• Per-tier numbers are upper bounds, not counts. The tiers overlap, so the
  eight labels add up to 883 against 665 actual findings. The test tiers
  alone are labelled 118 + 45 = 163 against 158 measured. Stated explicitly,
  because otherwise the numbers will not balance when clearing a tier.

Ruff 0.17 does not break the baseline

PR #440 (renovate,
ruff ^0.17.0) is open. Measured by installing ruff 0.17.0 and running it
against this tree:

• ruff check photoshop test scripts under the project config: passes,
  exit 0. The baseline holds.
• D-rule set: 72 rules in both 0.16.9 and 0.17.0, none added, none removed.
• D findings without the baseline: 665 in both.
• ruff format --check photoshop test scripts: 81 files already formatted in
  both.

One difference exists but does not fire here. 0.17 adds UP042
(replace-str-enum), which reports 2 hits (FontSize in
photoshop/api/enumerations.py:391, EventID in photoshop/api/event_id.py:5)
— under --target-version py311. This project sets target-version = "py38",
because the package still supports Python 3.8, and the suggested fix needs
enum.StrEnum (3.11+). Under py38, UP042 reports nothing, which is why the
check passes.

So no upper bound is needed to merge #440. If the project later raises
target-version to py311+, UP042 would start reporting and CI would go red —
at which point the two classes should be converted or UP042 added to the
ignore list, as a deliberate decision rather than a surprise.

Note that three places pin ruff independently: pyproject.toml (^0.16.9),
.github/workflows/pythonpackage.yml (pip install ruff==0.16.9), and
.pre-commit-config.yaml (rev: v0.16.9). #440 only bumps the first two. The
pre-commit pin will drift to whatever renovate bumps it to separately; all
three agree today, so this is a heads-up rather than a defect.

Validation

• ruff check photoshop test scripts: passes.
• ruff format --check photoshop test scripts: 81 files already formatted.
• python scripts/generate_llms.py --check: up to date; exits 1 on content
  drift (verified in CI, above), exits 0 on version-only drift.
• pytest test/test_collections.py test/test_imports.py: 18 passed.
• pyproject.toml still parses as valid TOML with all 8 baseline entries.

Configuration, comments, and CI only. No packaging or lockfile changes, and the
generated llms.txt / llms-full.txt are untouched — the version line still
converges through the bot pull request.

Tests under test/manual_test/ drive a real Photoshop COM instance and cannot
run in this environment; they were not executed.