Activity

1. mblua

   added

   enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request

   refactor

   EpicLarge cross-cutting work itemLarge cross-cutting work item

   on Oct 14, 2026
2. mblua commented on Oct 14, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 14, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Reviewed approach — analysis completed, implementation pending

   This records ac-architect-v5's recommendation, Rust feasibility and independent architecture review. Scope remains one app per settings file plus CLI/daemon. No application code, tests, build, runtime interaction or Git mutation was performed. The source remains clean at f6e5d08882ba9b208b56afe1fec44efb04925205.

   Recommendation

   Use one internal backend owner of the effective settings state, reusing SettingsState, its RwLock, existing protected-candidate helpers, source selection, transaction/writer and daemon request/result transport. Encapsulate write access; all app/PTY/daemon settings operations go through that owner. This represents effective configuration, including project-paths, agents and overlays, rather than a literal copy of one JSON file. There is no new external service or second authoritative cache.

   With the app Ready, CLI queries and mutations use the same owner, including token bootstrap, readers before proxying, and project registration that currently writes directly. With the app closed, CLI obtains exclusive ownership for its entire load/apply/save operation. A separate stable ownership sidecar, using existing OS lock primitives, coordinates app initialization through shutdown/drain against direct CLI operations. PID and the current momentary GUI mutex are discovery signals, not ownership proofs. The transaction lock remains separate. Locks are released by closing handles; deleting lock files at startup is not the remedy.

   Owner state identity retains the physical parent and logical target. The ownership gate covers the actual shared storage domain: agents, project-paths and the existing transaction sidecar have fixed neighboring paths. The future plan must finish that storage-closure map before fixing the gate scope. No extra GUI-instance design is included.

   Order complete operations: admission, current state, apply/validate, persist, adopt returned effective state, publish revision/result, then events. Use business operations and preconditions; full stale snapshots must not overwrite concurrent updates. Multi-field editor drafts require intent and a base revision; exact DTO/client adaptation remains to be specified. Snapshots may still wait behind writes; one owner does not prove low latency.

   Distinguish ordinary coherent snapshots, session retention with active plus archived projects, and privileged authorization with strict source/projection and current physical-path validation. Memory alone is not permission. Keep existing privileged captures and revalidation inside the owner until equivalence is demonstrated per caller. Retain source errors, conflicts, absence/null distinctions, overlay rules and protected fields. Obtain/release settings information before taking the separate session-save lock.

   Lifecycle and failure contracts

   • Acquire ownership before settings-affecting preflight/migrations; publish Ready only after valid state exists. Enumerate all preflight entry points and prove lock order. On shutdown, stop admission, resolve or reject pending operations, drain started work, remove Ready/endpoint and release ownership last.
   • A transport timeout while ownership is held never permits direct file fallback. Preserve request identity and distinguish rejected, pending/unknown and completed results; do not blindly repeat non-idempotent operations or replay old requests in a new owner epoch.
   • Cancellation of an await does not stop an already started blocking writer. The owner keeps task/guard ownership until a terminal outcome, and shutdown waits for it.
   • Existing saving can fail after agents changes, replacement, sync, verification or re-decoding. Visible bytes do not prove confirmed durable commit. Extend locked writer outcomes by stage, recover while exclusion is retained, and publish recovered state with diagnostics or remain non-authoritative. No false rollback or success, and no default save over an unreadable existing source. Do not merely wrap a saver that has already released its lock.
   • With a live unresponsive owner, affected CLI operations can return unavailable/pending. This is a potential availability cost, not a measured regression or accepted product change. Direct reads while that owner is active would contradict the requested unique file operator. Characterize current behavior per verb and expose the cost before the implementation plan; preserve the requirement meanwhile.

   Evidence and reuse

   The bounded Rust inventory covers app getters/writers, PTY, daemon and CLI bootstrap, coding-agent, project registration, create-agent-matrix, workgroup/self-switch, send/list-peers/close-session and related readers. References are at the fixed source SHA, relative to src-tauri/src/:

   • config/settings.rs:13826; lib.rs:4410-4419: existing shared state.
   • commands/config.rs:492-552,837-983: fresh getter and protected persistence/publication helpers.
   • config/sessions_persistence.rs:2604-2629: settings capture before transition checks/session lock.
   • main.rs:23-99; cli/mod.rs:387-425: preflight and token read before daemon routing.
   • cli/coding_agent.rs:438-494; cli/open_project.rs:43-104; cli/new_project.rs:40-82: partial routing and direct project registration.
   • config/settings.rs:8127-8205,11708-11885,12564-12820,13456-13462: capture, project transaction, writer and post-write uncertainty.
   • config/settings.rs:7213-7215,11223-11225,12284,12444-12514: neighboring shared artifacts and OS locks.

   MCP discovery was used first; its older metadata was checked against current source for material contracts. No exhaustive coverage is claimed from graph silence. Related #193/#195/#1437/#1102 remain open and are not automatically children or claimed fixed.

   Minimal technical sequence and acceptance

   1. Architect/Rust finalize storage closure, bootstrap/preflight order, safe queries, operation DTOs and staged results. Characterize existing contracts where necessary.
   2. Introduce encapsulated ownership, publication/recovery and initialization/drain coordination, preserving the existing writer's fresh gates.
   3. Migrate app/daemon and all enumerated CLI inputs, including pre-routing reads and direct registration. Adapt IPC/UI only where the operation contract requires it. Before serving memory as authority, classify every productive loader/saver/transaction/FS path, including wrappers and aliases; zero unclassified bypasses.
   4. Replace common captures with owner projections; remove privileged captures only after specific equivalence. Verify lifecycle/failure interleavings and compare the same PTY workload, results and restart durability. The earlier no-op candidate is complementary, not a replacement for ownership.

   These are technical dependencies, not an approved phase partition, child issues or implementation plan. Config ownership must not depend on AppHandle, mailbox, UI or SessionManager; adapters handle events outside the guard. Validate layers/cycles against the eventual diff.

   Measure captures per caller, pending operations, OS/internal wait and hold times, timeouts, getter latency and persisted results under comparable input/transitions. Reduced reads with stale authorization, lost updates or false success fail acceptance. No avoided-error percentage is established. The supplied sample shows nine timeouts and 727 completed acquisitions, not a permanently held lock.

   Provisional technical cost: 73/100, raw 148. Category scores: scope17, diagnosis11, domain16, ambiguity11, blast-radius17, integration12, verification16, state/compatibility17, concurrency19, environment12. Normalization: round((148-10)/190*99)+1. Process ceremony is excluded; remaining storage/contract decisions can change the estimate.

   Exact review evidence

   Artifacts are immutable under D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/:

   Artifact	SHA256 / outcome
   approach-v1.md	50dccb792539eefde851713c148beb6769f535735d1e4491a981f4161c982822
   censo-factibilidad-v1.md	e176452bf4ce35993c37a0df44555326dac0fb93e32cb870bdca77fd397e9d68
   factibilidad-approach-v1.md	cafec85c0657f197f4303d44e4cab9248798916f06dd808d46dc8fd73dfde228 — Rust: FACTIBLE_CON_CONDICIONES
   revision-arquitectura-v1.md	2276a9e50f2b8bdb292b76244e289f7c2f69312ea9bf53b37155f5af798dfad8 — independent architecture: APPROACH_PASS
   respuesta-autor-revision-v1.md	4ed438da6dc5a81949dc42c0a9367a81e5d064dacfd2a0a5e2b480752d5d42db — author response, approach bytes unchanged

   No blocking conceptual findings remain. Future-plan conditions have owners: Architect/Rust for storage/preflight, safe DTOs and result protocol; Rust/reviewer for bypass closure, staged recovery, task/drain ownership and caller-specific equivalence; future testing for availability/workload behavior. These capabilities are not yet implemented or proven. Epic remains OPEN for later implementation with its own authorization, exact plan consensus and delivery checks; DEBUG-plan votes do not transfer.
3. mblua commented on Oct 14, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 14, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Reusable ownership proposal — ready for user evaluation, not implementation

   The user-requested extension now has a concrete proposal authored by ac-architect-v5, exact-version independent architecture review and Rust feasibility. Source: f6e5d08882ba9b208b56afe1fec44efb04925205. Earlier settings-only reviews do not certify this extension; the new reviews below do.

   Who owns the resource

   For settings, the existing app backend would create and retain a proposed SettingsOwner component in the config layer. It encapsulates the current SettingsState/AppSettings/RwLock. App commands, PTY and daemon/mailbox are callers of that same owner. Domain logic defines validation, projections and authorization; the coordination mechanism controls authority, admission, complete-operation ordering and outcomes.

   Ownership is per storage domain, comprising resources that an operation must coordinate. Settings has selected sources, agents, project-paths and related persistence artifacts. State identity retains the physical parent and logical target; the ownership gate covers the actual shared storage closure. That map must be completed before implementation. Neither one independent owner per filename nor one global owner for all files is recommended.

   App ownership lasts through initialization, Ready service and drain. A stable ownership sidecar, separate from the transaction lock, would reuse existing OS lock primitives. With the app open, CLI resolves identity/endpoint without reading settings and requests the existing daemon, which calls SettingsOwner. With the app closed, CLI obtains ownership for the entire direct load/apply/save operation using the same domain policies. A held gate or transport failure never permits direct fallback. No new service is proposed.

   Concrete proposed API and operation path

   The following are proposed contract names, not implemented symbols:

   SettingsOwner.read(context, projection)
     -> Snapshot(revision=(epoch, sequence), value) or ReadError
   SettingsOwner.apply(context, request_id, expected, SettingsOperation)
     -> Rejected | FailedBeforeWrite | Committed(revision)
        | PartialOrUnknown(stage, recovery)
   SettingsOwner.result(context, epoch, request_id)
     -> Known | Pending | Unknown
   SettingsOwner.drain()
     -> close admission and wait for started work
   

   flowchart LR
     App["App commands / PTY"] --> O["Proposed SettingsOwner"]
     CLI["CLI bootstrap / routing"] --> M["Existing daemon / mailbox"]
     M --> O
     O --> P["Settings policy + existing loader/writer"]
     P --> D["Physical settings storage group"]
     CLI --> C["App closed: obtain ownership gate"]
     C --> P
   

   Loading

   Only the policy/persistence path invoked under valid owner authority opens or writes the group. Productive bypasses must be closed before memory serves as authority.

   An ordinary read returns a coherent projection under the read guard. Privileged reads preserve strict source/project-path authorization and physical validation; memory is not permission. A mutation admits and records the request, takes the exclusive guard, checks current state/preconditions/authorization, builds a protected candidate, invokes the transactional writer in blocking work, adopts its confirmed effective result, advances revision, records the outcome, releases the guard and emits effects. No raw JSON save, remote closure or blind stale full-object replacement. Multi-field drafts carry intent and a base revision.

   Canceling an await does not cancel a started writer. The owner retains work until terminal outcome; drain waits before releasing ownership. Errors after agents/replacement/sync/redecode can leave disk changed: recover under retained exclusion or invalidate authority, without false rollback or commit. Reads after invalidation must reject or explicitly label historical state. Request receipt capacity, authorization, epoch, retention and replay still need exact contracts; Unknown does not permit automatic reexecution. Keep session locks separate and obtain/release settings information before taking them.

   How the pattern can be repeated

   Repeat identity/resource closure, authority, bounded admission, complete operations, task/result ownership, revision, drain and DEBUG attribution. Keep each domain's typed API, representation, validation, authorization, persistence strategy, durability and recovery. Start with small settings contracts; extract shared helpers only when a second compatible adoption demonstrates their value. No generic trait, global registry, actor, mutex for every file or universal in-memory mirror is proposed now.

   Representative family	Current evidence / future applicability
   Settings	Effective composed snapshot, protected candidates, transaction/writer and partial daemon routing. First proposed adoption; preserve sources, overlays and post-write uncertainty.
   Sessions	Snapshot persistence and unique temporary/rename retries. A future adoption must avoid duplicating live session state. The productive path prepares a snapshot before its lock; its leaf saver can return Ok without writing when agents is unreadable and has no sync_all in that body. It does not inherit settings durability automatically.
   TASK-status	Existing authorized CLI/orchestrator operations, bounded JSONL tail, revision checks, append/sync, last-request replay and journal recovery. Preserve this operational ownership; do not impose a resident backend owner, snapshot saver or full-history cache.

   Evidence is bounded, not an all-file inventory. No heavy traffic is asserted for these examples and neither sessions nor TASK-status migration is authorized. Large files, external writers and shared neighboring resources require explicit domain policy/authority decisions; not every file belongs entirely in memory.

   Instrumentation

   Architecture instrumentation means encapsulating FS capabilities, routing inventoried callers and checking bootstrap/preflight/recovery for bypasses. Operational diagnostics use existing DEBUG logging and monotonic durations, without a new exporter: authority/admission, projection, persistence stages, publication/results and drain. Attribute opaque domain, owner process/epoch, caller/verb, request/operation ID, revision, pending depth, wait/hold/duration, physical reads/writes/bytes, stage, typed error and omitted/partial/confirmed result. Separate internal waiting from ownership-gate and transaction-lock waiting.

   Use bounded interval summaries and measure DEBUG-on/off cost. Do not log tokens, settings/status content, PTY arguments or sensitive paths. Preserve current operational errors; new diagnostic traces add no INFO noise. No benefit percentage is established.

   Review outcome and remaining decisions

   Independent architecture: APPROACH_PASS. Rust: FACTIBLE_CON_CONDICIONES. Both reviewed the exact proposal digest; author consolidation accepts the future-plan conditions without changing its bytes.

   Before implementation, Architect/Rust must close storage/preflight/gate scope and justify the sidecar against existing primitives; safe bootstrap, projections and operation DTOs; receipt capacity/retention/epoch; staged recovery and worker/drain; ordinary-read semantics after invalidation. Characterize CLI availability per verb when the live owner is unresponsive. No direct fallback is adopted and no availability regression has been accepted. Score the actual implementation scope; historical provisional73/100 was settings-only, not a universal migration estimate.

   The user's conceptual evaluation is pending. Minimal first adoption: encapsulate settings capabilities, cover lifecycle and bypasses, then replace equivalent common captures and measure matching workload/latency/durable results. Evaluate another storage domain only from traffic, writers and cost evidence. This is not a READY implementation plan, phase partition or delivery authorization.

   Artifacts under D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/:

   Artifact	SHA256
   approach-reutilizable-v1.md — Spanish proposal for user review	065a0dec17991c1f24855c10985112fd8099d5e0384201e6be5254670d95e573
   evidencia-reutilizacion-v1.md	88912f6c4bf2aa2e0ed36509be94a19c1833b4676c58a29a094ffc24f94bbc7d
   revision-reutilizable-v1.md — independent architecture	9e09acf4194924438eb26832ba6034d2bc5d86449fc08681541860858c64e442
   factibilidad-reutilizable-v1.md — Rust	a927dd61685629adfb678e74a88315d3b26932195938a058e601adc7a8fbf4f4
   resultado-reutilizable-v1.md — author consolidation	6e5bdac7e09afeeb649a70c7d7566ebab0ee6a52be4f28f9a38eb50e04198034

   Fixed-source references, relative to src-tauri/src/: settings.rs:13826,11708,12592; commands/config.rs:837; cli/coding_agent.rs:438-494; sessions_persistence.rs:1721-1787,2245-2262; cli/task_ops.rs:646-717,797-927; cli/task_append_body.rs:348-493. Detailed bounded evidence and its graph-coverage limitations are retained in the reviewed artifacts. No code, build, tests, runtime, migrations, branches or dependencies were changed for this analysis. Epic remains OPEN.
4. mblua commented on Oct 15, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 15, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Implementation planning intake — scope and workflow

   The user authorized preparing the concrete plan, stages/issues, tests and acceptance criteria for review before programming. Plan the settings adoption with a repeatable ownership discipline; do not migrate sessions, TASK-status or all system files. No product code or runtime/build work is authorized by this planning assignment. Source synchronized and worktree clean: f6e5d08882ba9b208b56afe1fec44efb04925205.

   The existing provisional settings estimate is reused because its source and implementation boundary are unchanged. The complete file inventory and finalized contracts may require a scoped correction. This is not an estimate of hours or a universal migration.

   Technical category	Points	Anchor and evidence
   Scope footprint	17	Between module10 and cross-cutting20: app/PTY/CLI/daemon and DTO surfaces, multiple direct callers.
   Diagnosis difficulty	11	Near reproducible unfamiliar subsystem10: runtime diagnosis exists; remaining attribution is bounded, without repeating the audit.
   Domain knowledge	16	Between subsystem10 and lifetime semantics20: persistence layers, authorization, durability and Tokio ownership.
   Solution-space ambiguity	11	Near viable alternatives10: conceptual owner selected, physical gate/projection contracts need concrete decisions.
   Blast radius/reversibility	17	Between shared-path10 and persistent data/security20: settings and permissions; reverting code does not revert written data.
   Dependency/integration	12	Above contract10: Rust/IPC/UI and CLI integration, without an additional service.
   Verification difficulty	16	Between supported harness10 and hard-to-observe ownership20: handoff, cancellation, partial writes and comparable workload.
   State/data/compatibility	17	Between persistence10 and live compatibility20: composed sources and wire DTOs; no new persisted format requested.
   Concurrency/timing	19	Near shared-state/shutdown20: multiprocess handoff, lock ordering and uncertain outcomes.
   Environment/tooling	12	Above platform-specific10: Windows and Unix locking/sync behavior; no environment changes requested.

   Raw148. round((148-10)/190*99)+1 = 73/100 provisional.

   Excluded ceremony: issue creation, branch naming/push, PR creation, CI waiting, review rounds, delegation/messaging, changelog, version bump, merge and cleanup. Necessary product verification remains technical work.

   Workflow: Full (score56–100 and architecture/cross-cutting/persistence criteria). Architect authors; Rust owning dev, Rust Grinch and Architecture Grinch independently review the same complete digest set. The eventual implementing owner votes on its phase; involve UI owner only if the actual file/contract inventory requires UI implementation. Vetoes apply: verification>=8 reviews proof, blast-radius>=12 requires full impact tables for user review, environment>=8 requires owning dev's written environment risk; state/concurrency already require architect-led contracts. Author states partition from the actual inventory, not the earlier four conceptual blocks.

   Canonical project plan root: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/plans/2992-settings-owner/. Follow immutable version naming from the project guidelines, beginning with plan-v1-settings-owner.md; preserve Full partition, cold-start phase, consensus/digest and execution-record requirements. The author must identify the exact canonical set and explain its version mapping before certification. No plan or branch currently exists for implementation; phase branches are created only when their later implementation begins from current main.

   Round1 begins only after this round's workgroup-wide dry-run and real purge. Historical proposal reviews are evidence, not votes on the plan. Independent verdicts and any revisions are recorded against exact bytes. User review remains before product programming; no elapsed work, conceptual approval or standing authorization substitutes for the still-unwritten exact plan.
5. mblua commented on Oct 15, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 15, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   E2992 — user decision: unique owner and bounded CLI failure

   User response during formal planning round1, after Architecture identified the current local-reader availability difference at source f6e5d08.

   Question presented: «Si el backend sigue vivo pero no responde, ¿preferís mantener al único dueño de settings y que las consultas CLI afectadas devuelvan un error tras un plazo limitado, o permitir lecturas directas de respaldo? La segunda opción cambia el requisito de que sólo el dueño opere sobre el archivo.»

   Explicit user answer: «Mantener dueño único y devolver error si no responde (Recomendado)».

   Decision: retain the unique settings owner. Affected CLI queries may fail after a bounded wait when the backend remains alive but unresponsive. No direct-file fallback while ownership is held. Architecture defines concrete per-verb timeout/result/uncertain-outcome behavior in the implementation plan; this decision does not authorize blind mutation replay or claim runtime timings measured.

   This resolves the availability product choice only. Preparing the plan, exact technical consensus, phases/issues and user review remains the current task; no product code or build/runtime execution is authorized by this response.
6. mblua commented on Oct 15, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 15, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   E2992 — round1 consensus baseline

   Rejected/incomplete master: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/plans/2992-settings-owner/plan-v1-settings-owner.md.
   Plan-SHA256 B038E7D174B9E429482FB9E60715663A23FF5FE1228EA509B1D0D4AE5E226888.
   Author report planning-r1-author-result.md SHA256 BFC9F86A1F10BBA6726626C86182C680642150B7978FFD1337CC4265F8C39D0F.

   Author: NEEDS_ANOTHER_ROUND. Rust owning dev: entry blocked, no plan verdict. UI owning dev, Rust Grinch and Architecture Grinch: no assignment/verdict on an incomplete candidate. Independent plan approvals: zero. This is round1's comparison baseline.

   The canonical file was truncated during a long Windows Bash heredoc write and ends main.r. It has60 lines/8082bytes, no complete implementation contracts, phase files or digest set. Preserve it unchanged. Failure is materialization and incomplete planning, not an independent rejection of the conceptual approach.

   Remaining candidate work: physical resource/producers/bypass closure; bootstrap and safe authority/lookup; intent/revision DTO compatibility; admission/work and receipt bounds/epoch/replay; cancellation/drain and staged recovery; references/layers and cold-start green phases with frontend ownership; executable validation and workflow parity. No such work may be left as an implementer's design choice or declared already tested.

   Reusable progress: user's explicit unique-owner/bounded-unavailable decision; five initial participants; new early-read callers and preflight/postwrite evidence; fixed source f6e5d08; PRE219modules/1211pairs/existing SCC89 with matching arc record. Do not rerun the general runtime diagnosis or unchanged PRE without material change.

   Next round requires new whole-workgroup dry-run/real purge after all assigned reports and idle check. Author writes complete plan-v2 using a file-writing tool, not a long shell command; no overwrite of v1, no hidden READY. Then exact whole-set independent reviews. User-visible lack-of-consensus report was published before starting round2. No new user authorization is needed to continue this planning scope; no implementation is authorized.
7. mblua commented on Oct 15, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 15, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   E2992 — round2, no complete candidate

   Author NEEDS_ANOTHER_ROUND; no new canonical master, phases or digest set. Independent approvals remain0, with no formal review assignment or verdict by Rust/UI/Grinches. Existing incomplete v1 remains byte-identical B038E7D174B9E429482FB9E60715663A23FF5FE1228EA509B1D0D4AE5E226888. Author report planning-r2-author-result.md SHA2561344D65232690546BC6841B22494DE2A324291F7EE1EBC7F7A1A184FF019CB5B.

   Progreso de consenso desde la ronda anterior: SÍ.

   Reviewer approval count0→0. Physical auxiliary-source uncertainty was materially narrowed: blocking-menu process cache versus agent-help per-read policy, concrete remote producers/stamps, and dormant source protocol not to activate. This is source evidence, not wording progress or a claim that physical closure is complete. No implementation or readiness is certified.

   Recurring blockers: complete physical/caller inventory, authorized projections/bootstrap, typed stale updates, bounded work/receipts and epoch, worker/drain/recovery, reference placement and green phase partition. New concrete risks: settings fallback under sessions lock; Telegram secrets and Matrix AppSettings needs not served by generic redaction; request/result precedent lacks demonstrated secret-channel security/receipt durability; a router in cli/mod creates forbidden new clean-boundary pairs for some callers. No previously approved blocker was reopened because none was approved. The round1 write truncation was not repeated; no v2 was created.

   Next candidate must make the remaining technical choices, not merely list them. Reuse source facts/PRE and the explicit user decision; no repeated runtime diagnosis or product approval question. In round3 the coordinator will assign focused factual review of the existing pending candidate to Rust and frontend while the architect closes operation/transport/recovery/phase decisions. Those reviews are evidence support, not PLAN_APPROVED or product execution. All five initial consensus participants remain required for the eventual complete digest set.

   Publish this lack-of-consensus result to user/Epic before round3's mandatory workgroup-wide dry-run/real purge. User authorization remains planning, stages/issues after consensus and review before programming.
8. mblua commented on Oct 15, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 15, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   E2992 — round3, complete v2 candidate rejected

   Reviewed master: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/plans/2992-settings-owner/plan-v2-settings-owner.md.
   Plan-SHA256: 30FAF86BCA772CBB8294E78C5C3B108C420997DA023C01A1F7D0D444C0788A17.
   Exact set: master plus19 phases in planning-r3-candidate-integrity.json SHA256 A34F19E4807870A2B303BF9D61985A59A08907D25A6C9B746003FCD3C922F7B4; all20 hashes independently verified by lead and reviewers. Historical v1 remains unchanged and excluded. No product/tests/build/runtime/GUI, child issues or branches were authorized or produced.

   Participant results

   Participant	Exact-set result	Verified report SHA256
   ac-architect-v5	Complete candidate READY_FOR_COLD_VALIDATION; final certification/vote pending	planning-r3-author-result.md D0BD9C10D2541E77293746C9DFF7F90F49DB154D45A14AC146639323B171AD13
   ac-dev-rust-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED	planning-r3-rust-formal-v2.md 88295F026116F123D1AAABA284D70541955CFDD60E508B144A4400C65AD6F443
   ac-dev-rust-grinch-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED	planning-r3-rust-grinch-verdict.md DDE0BD40405B013209F8A2A658E97AFAA574C955CCC4EBCD3ED0082329962C93
   ac-architect-grinch-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED	planning-r3-architecture-grinch-formal-review-v2.md 6D8A15CF141B1191D2F800CCE7E7CE68BF8C493FB81FA883E2D32DD78C858F19
   ac-dev-webpage-ui-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED	planning-r3-ui-verdict.md F1F8E0ED8C85A598B61D66218497B5C490E58E21F6D0AF4C074EAB1E3BE90A6E

   Reports are in D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/. There are zero PLAN_APPROVED votes; local PHASE_EXECUTABLE observations are not partial set approval and never replace another owner/reviewer.

   Consolidated required corrections

   1. Staged behavior and bootstrap: specify the pre-activation owner state, source/freshness/Invalid behavior of migrated readers, RPC directory/polling/secret-projection inactivity, and exact main preflight/logger/notice order during P11..P20. Rust finds the strategy feasible; Rust Grinch finds these transition decisions insufficiently specified. Preserve and resolve that disagreement with explicit decisions and proof, not by preferring one verdict.
   2. Phase-specific proof: replace generic acceptance boilerplate with bounded named cases, test locations, stimuli/barriers/fault controls, and positive/negative observable results for each changed contract. Core/transport need exclusion/release, admission saturation/dedup, cancellation, multi-file ledger/recovery/Invalid, reentry, epoch, lost result/no replay, and credential protection cases. Use existing inline/tempdir/fault facilities; no generic harness or tests executed during planning. Retain UI's stale/unknown/dirty/epoch/parity requirements.
   3. Executable guard commands: all19 phases currently invoke integration-test names with cargo test --lib filters. Correct commands must actually run the named integration targets, rather than succeed with zero tests. No optional extra guard becomes a blocker.
   4. First-phase dependency execution: P01 declares no dependency but its set -u shell unconditionally consumes DEPENDENCY_PR/MERGE_SHA. Make the shared dependency protocol executable with a genuinely empty first-phase dependency list, without fabricating evidence or dropping ancestry checks.
   5. Closure scope/order: reconcile P20/P21 legacy-handler rejection/removal, missing P20 handler paths and the per-phase file budget. Architecture Grinch identifies transient duplicate work and multiple changed contracts; author must decide and justify the necessary sequence/atomic activation and contract label. Its suggested reordering is an option, not a coordinator-authored solution or unilateral instruction to remove scope. Reconcile conflicting Ready withdrawal/publication callback/drain order in master versus P20, including final retention/cleanup and tests.
   6. Frontend closure: P18 removes SettingsAPI.get while AgentPickerModal, log-level, sidebar/App and resource-monitor/App still call it outside the planned impacts. Author must choose compatible read alias or complete migration before retirement. UI also found legacy command mocks/assertions in Titlebar.webserver.test.tsx and SettingsModal.general-nav.test.tsx omitted from P16/P18. Complete the targeted caller/fixture census, include necessary files, repartition within budget, and keep each caller and its tests green together; no fake write compatibility or weakened assertions. The examples demonstrate incompleteness, not exhaustive discovery.
   7. Final artifact contract: unify all affected specification text with the literal lead workflow name agentscommander_standalone_room-18_.exe, built by shipper after final merged clean main equals origin/main. Keep the existing build output as the copy source, exact permitted output/UTC/hash/bytes/source-SHA receipt, and no installation/build now. The lead's earlier shorthand omitted agentscommander; corrected shared source is planning-r3-lead-workflow-source.md SHA256 E8E660E233D5FA8E104E1DD6EE6BEEACEFEE03AE7288007F496F9BD3C564E75C. Reviewers' shortened filenames do not override that literal source.
   8. Immutable certification: COLD is valid for reviewing v2, not implementation permission. The shared lead-workflow extract requires Status: READY_FOR_IMPLEMENTATION in the implementation plan; no external replacement exception was verified. Reconcile the next complete candidate with that literal requirement and author rules without editing v2, transferring votes, or demanding future execution results before planning. Any real contradictory rule must be cited exactly. All changed bytes require the same five participants' votes on the new complete set.

   Owning Rust and UI ENVIRONMENT_RISK statements are now written and reusable where applicable. No new product decision is requested: bounded unavailable CLI, sole ownership and no fallback/replay remain fixed. Nonblocking reviewer suggestions remain nonblocking.

   Progress against round2

   Progreso de consenso desde la ronda anterior: SÍ.

   Independent approvals remain0→0. Material progress: missing complete candidate was eliminated; a physically complete master/19-phase set now exists, with exact impacts/owners/dependencies and verified hashes. Placement/cycle uncertainty narrowed to classified references: two new pairs internal to the existing SCC89, no new module; architecture reviewer verified the comparator and classification. Operation/projection/epoch/receipt/recovery/drain contracts are now written, not just a list of questions. Both owners supplied written environment risk.

   Recurring/narrowed blockers: bootstrap/transition semantics, proof of persistence/transport invariants and cold-executable green partition are still incomplete at concrete sites. New blockers: zero-test guard commands, P01 dependency variables, omitted UI readers/suites, activation/legacy-handler impacts and drain-order contradictions, final artifact naming. No approved blocker reopened because none had been approved. A complete candidate is progress, not consensus, readiness or measured runtime improvement.

   Next round

   Publish this report to user/Epic before the next mandatory whole-workgroup cold gate. After all assigned reports and commands finish and peers are idle, dry-run then real purge; require explicit success/exit0. Round4 author must preserve v1/v2 and existing stable IDs, produce a new complete version and affected phase files, reuse factual evidence/PRE/environment statements, close these specific decisions and proof gaps, and return the exact full digest set. Do not repeat global investigation, prescribe a phase count, create children/branches, implement, or request another planning permission. Formal reviewers then review that exact candidate before materializing phase issues and presenting the plan for user review before code.

   EOF
9. mblua commented on Oct 15, 2026

   

   mblua

   on Oct 15, 2026

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   E2992 — round4, v3 needs three focused corrections

   Master: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/plans/2992-settings-owner/plan-v3-settings-owner.md.
   Plan-SHA256: 0737A97ED4ECB3C9B0599EFD6518E87828EA3026E160EA7420EB87757214469B.
   Exact set: master plus25 phases in planning-r4-candidate-integrity.json SHA256 943AA87CFCCD2E24A9EE089BBF4281865F6F84166C05D7020313A6D8687358FF. All26 hashes independently verified;21 previous canonical files unchanged. Source f6e5d08. No product/tests/build/runtime/GUI, branches, child issues or delivery occurred.

   Exact-set participant verdicts

   Participant	Verdict	Verified report SHA256
   ac-architect-v5	Author supports exact READY_FOR_IMPLEMENTATION candidate; no code permission	planning-r4-author-result.md AB99443FBFE6D853FBC70768ED27D07926971E2026B252FF9307DA4BC880BC79
   ac-dev-rust-v5	PLAN_APPROVED for17 owned Rust phases and common contract; UI vote not replaced	planning-r4-rust-formal-v3.md 03A1A3FF94C8BCE049841328D5EC2238869B8DFF6728F50F6F2D5E718DBCDF40
   ac-dev-rust-grinch-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED	planning-r4-rust-grinch-verdict-v3.md 13FFC88F4545ADF7B99736D1151D5B30A83E895231E633E0C3F85AD6C2617F6E
   ac-architect-grinch-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED	planning-r4-architecture-grinch-verdict-v3.md D089E32F7C2B3EFB3BEA167E603FFC7CECC38CC2F3C93A9CA17850B9104BCA74
   ac-dev-webpage-ui-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED; one local-command omission in own phases	planning-r4-ui-formal-v3.md 0D271D3CF8367D3B385B59E765E2729AA1B8918573D738E8D2B93787F08DA69D

   All reports are in D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/. One of four required independent votes approves, three require changes. The author marker and PHASE_EXECUTABLE rows do not override dissent. No partial vote transfers to new bytes.

   Consolidated remaining findings

   1. Staged background capture/lock amplification (Rust Grinch S1; architecture B1). Master:165 and the identical staged section require every migrated current_snapshot/Retention/query to strictly recapture composed sources under transaction exclusion. menu_guard currently reads RAM on a250ms loop (pty/menu_guard/mod.rs:303-307,445-452); P07 migrates it. Other periodic consumers include git_watcher, remote_watcher and scheduler. This creates repeated multi-file captures and lock acquisition in the intermediate merged states, with potential Busy/timeouts and no counter-based proof limiting the regression. The original epic addresses lock contention. Author must choose a phase-safe ordinary/background read policy, preserve privileged freshness and apply staleness checks, and add controlled physical-capture/lock-count proof for periodic readers. Reviewers offered alternatives; coordinator chooses none. Distinguish ordinary reads, Retention, user actions and fresh authority captures explicitly. A weaker freshness claim alone does not justify added lock traffic.
   2. Coding-agent mutation notification and intermediate lost-update risk (Rust Grinch S2). P13 changes the CLI mutation route before active ownership, but the specified path does not retain the GUI-open mailbox notification behavior. Existing mailbox emits coding_agent_settings_updated; the UI store/modal depend on it. Legacy whole-object writers remain during some later phases and can submit an outdated agents list. Source merge_protected_coding_agent_settings takes client membership, so a silent CLI add can be overwritten. After P20 the owner must also have an explicit post-commit dedicated-event contract; preserving a subscription without an emitter is insufficient. Author decides the necessary transition route/order and active notification responsibility. Add a controlled CLI-mutation plus GUI-save scenario proving event delivery and agent survival, preserving protected output, final authority and no replay. Do not assume Rust's general feasibility approval resolves this independent finding.
   3. P38 local command missing (owning UI UI-V3-1; architecture O2 noted nonblocking). P38:78-83 names store/watchers cases, :85-90 has cd/comment/typecheck/build, and the common section points back to Focused acceptance. There is no local npm test invocation for its selected suites. Full CI correctly runs all tests, but the phase promises executable local checks too. UI's owning verdict therefore requires the explicit invocation from R: npm test -- src/shared/stores/settings.test.ts src/watchers/App.test.tsx. Fix in new preserved bytes; no product/assertion/scope/phase-count change or test execution now. Preserve the difference in reviewer classification without treating the owner's required executable check as waived.

   Reviewer notes on per-suffix focused-test checks, copied irrelevant text and epoch wording remain nonblocking. Existing controlled matrices, positive/negative proof, guards, impacts, no-replay/security and drain controls must remain. Any genuinely new scope concern is reported with evidence; do not silently expand or remove work.

   Progress from round3

   Progreso de consenso desde la ronda anterior: SÍ.

   Required independent approval count increased0→1. All eight prior consolidated groups are closed or materially resolved in the reviewed text: staged state/sequence and RPC inactivity are explicit; proof matrices and real integration guards exist; P01 handles an empty dependency list; IPC/mailbox retirement precedes atomic activation; drain ordering agrees; UI readers/writers/fixtures and all necessary suites have assigned impacts; final artifact and immutable READY candidate rules agree. UI independently found no other own contract blocker and confirmed prior UI1/UI2 closure. Both owners confirmed written environment risk with v3 deltas. The25-phase/101-path set is complete and budgets/dependencies/impacts were verified.

   New blockers are the regression introduced by the selected staged recapture policy, the transition/active dedicated notification gap, and P38's missing explicit local command. The first narrows the remaining staging concern to physical traffic rather than undefined state; it is not closure of the new regression. No earlier approved/landed phase was reopened; no phases have landed. The positive Rust vote still identifies v3 only and cannot approve v4 automatically. No runtime improvement or failure was measured during documentary review.

   Next action

   Publish this lack-of-consensus result to user/Epic before the round5 whole-workgroup cold gate. All four review assignments have concrete results. After commands finish and peers are idle, require dry_run_ready then purged with exit0. Author prepares the next complete preserved version, keeping all47 existing canonical files unchanged and stable IDs, with the three focused decisions/corrections and exact full digest set. Reuse factual UI inventory/supplement, PRE/classification and environment statements; no new broad census, framework, product work, tests/build/runtime, phase issues or permission question. All same five participants vote on the new exact set. Then materialize native phase issues and present the complete plan for user review before code.

   EOF
10. mblua commented on Oct 15, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 15, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    E2992 — round5, two approvals and a targeted P08 freshness gap

    Master: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/plans/2992-settings-owner/plan-v4-settings-owner.md.
    Plan-SHA256: A4FF3181DE528158C2915087F3F3C4F0B7FBA08FEEED078C138E5F8DEDBB9AEC.
    Exact object: master plus25 phases in planning-r5-candidate-integrity.json SHA256 57C409007EBDB9D9A2DAD3CAA2B57D7389875CA9F71302AA54BD9BBE26D8DF63. Lead and reviewers verified all26 digests, budgets/dependencies/101-path union and47 unchanged historical files. Source f6e5d08. No product, product tests/build/runtime/GUI, branches, child issues or delivery occurred.

    Participant results

    Participant	Exact-set verdict	Verified report SHA256
    ac-architect-v5	Author supports complete READY_FOR_IMPLEMENTATION candidate, not code permission	planning-r5-author-result.md 786793D3A500454B637ACD79FBE497FCBD068F3E0947BDCDC61417412805EE98
    ac-dev-rust-v5	PLAN_APPROVED for17 owned phases and common contract	planning-r5-rust-formal-v4.md 6BEFB520493B479FE94EA0B93C832DAFD279BFA2A82589456673DA0968A4E05C
    ac-dev-webpage-ui-v5	PLAN_APPROVED for8 owned phases and common contract	planning-r5-ui-formal-v4.md 3335B2CFD19AF4A750CE838367812DEF4343221EDCFF02DBD3406D3157D269C3
    ac-dev-rust-grinch-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED; only P08 PHASE_UNDERSPECIFIED	planning-r5-rust-grinch-verdict-v4.md 86CDDC913B3C7236C497C0278369C06A132FC6622360D0EE06301F1258D3A9D3
    ac-architect-grinch-v5	CHANGES_REQUIRED; only P08 PHASE_UNDERSPECIFIED	planning-r5-architecture-grinch-verdict-v4.md 613B13BF6D824047A67F8FC4D37573E682C5DFD04D3FC8BA42E0F2E3D13DEDA9

    Reports are in D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/. Two of four required independent votes approve, two require changes. Owners' approvals do not waive independent dissent or authorize implementation; new bytes require applicable exact-set votes from the same five participants.

    Consolidated remaining findings: distinguish existing disk readers from RAM readers

    Rust Grinch S3: fresh authorization captures and revocation. P08:14 routes seven mailbox sites through registered settings access without individually classifying them as fresh/physical: mailbox.rs:4623,4817,5458,5586,6824 use strict project-path capture; :7695,10709 compare root_token from a current physical load. P08's ordinary-query zero-capture test does not prove their required freshness. A mistaken RAM classification could accept a token/path revoked on disk until a later publication. The contract already preserves fresh revocation/final-use authority; P06 explicitly classifies its equivalent pty_input path, but P08 lacks the corresponding mapping and proof. Author must make the targeted classification explicit, retain the actual existing strict capture/exclusion semantics where required, and add positive/negative mailbox revocation proof, including physical counters distinguishing privileged routes from zero-I/O ordinary readers.

    Architecture Grinch H1: existing disk-based team discovery and transition freshness. discover_teams() at teams.rs:1786-1788 loads physical settings per invocation. Its authorization/coordinator consumers include mailbox.rs:7859,8015,10717,13211, session.rs:1587, actuation.rs:129 and lib sites cited in the report. A legacy CLI new-project/open-project while GUI is open must not become invisible to those callers during intermediate mains. Root-token sites overlap S3. The blanket RAM rule and claim about "today's RAM readers" do not classify these existing disk readers correctly. Author must preserve their necessary observed freshness without adding the periodic exclusive-lock traffic just removed, and specify a controlled legacy project-path change/discovery test with counters for the applicable existing lock behavior. H1's proposed lock-free behavior refers to existing non-strict load_settings readers; it must not silently replace the existing locked strict project-path captures covered by S3.

    These findings overlap but are not interchangeable: S3 includes five explicit strict project-path authorization sites and token revocation; H1 adds team discovery/coordinator visibility and the distinction between existing non-strict disk reads and RAM reads. Preserve both sets of callers and proof obligations. H1 says Active policy need not change, while S3 invokes the retained final-use/fresh-revocation contract. Author must reconcile by actual call-site/source contract rather than generalize either statement to all paths. Coordinator chooses no storage/API design or reviewer alternative.

    Required next decisions: classify the bounded P08 sites; distinguish ordinary/background RAM reads from already-physical privileged/non-strict readers; preserve current revocation, discovery, error and exclusion semantics through every intermediate main; update P08 and any conflicting master/common text; assign explicit counter/barrier positive/negative tests. Keep zero new I/O/transaction-lock attempts for readers that currently use RAM. No new global audit, domain/framework, dependency, phase-count target, product test execution or permission question is needed.

    Nonblocking notes on per-suffix test listing, P01 copied prefix text and P04 breadth remain nonblocking. Earlier event/ledger/ACL/no-replay/drain/CI/final-artifact controls stay intact. No new application vulnerability or measured runtime regression is asserted: these are prospective specification findings.

    Progress from round4

    Progreso de consenso desde la ronda anterior: SÍ.

    Required independent approvals increased1→2, with new exact-byte approval by both owners and written environment deltas. All three round4 correction groups closed: background RAM readers no longer gain per-tick physical captures/locks and have counter/positive-control proof; Staged GUI-open mailbox/event plus typed postcommit emission and atomic activation preserve notifications; P38 now explicitly invokes both local suites. Both Grinches recognized those closures, and UI found no own blocker.

    New/narrowed blocker: the RAM-policy correction was overgeneralized to some sites that already read disk, exposing the P08 classification/freshness gap above. This narrows the remaining transition concern to specific existing disk readers rather than periodic-reader contention or undefined staging. No formerly approved/landed phase reopened: none has landed, v4 owner votes remain bound to v4 only. Tests/runtime were not run; no performance percentage is claimed.

    Next round

    Publish this report to user/Epic before round6's mandatory whole-workgroup idle/dry-run/real-purge gate. All assigned formal reports are received. Author preserves all73 existing canonical files, prepares a complete new master and affected phase versions with explicit bounded P08 classification/proof, and reports the complete digest set. Reuse unchanged evidence and phase analysis; do not rewrite or re-investigate unrelated work. A common-contract byte change requires all affected phase versions; unchanged phase bytes may retain their identity under partition rules, but the same five participants still vote on the new exact set. Do not transfer owner votes to changed bytes.

    Only after exact consensus materialize native phase issues/mapping, then present complete plan to the user for review before code. No implementation, branch, test/build/runtime or installation is authorized now.

    EOF
11. mblua

    added sub-issues on Oct 15, 2026

    • Settings ownership P41: owner recovery (E2992 minimum v8) #2994
    • Settings ownership P40: constructors (E2992 minimum v8) #2993
    • Settings ownership P42: command readers (E2992 minimum v8) #2996
12. 30 remaining items

    Load more

13. mblua commented on Oct 20, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 20, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    P51 delivered in PR #3137, merged at 2026-10-20T04:35:09Z. Child #3118 is CLOSED. Clean local main equals origin/main at 0ad47a60f27f96b8116ac6c63f7dcd162a087c6f; tree 30dbd065be0242fd7dc21c6421bf7b9cb3d82c16 exactly matches the tested PR head 4f9b779a04234535e175134eaaaf703420b6262b. Feature branch removed locally and remotely; inactive original source ref remains preserved.

    Unavailable engine sources now retain state while independent liveness/activity/cleanup continues; authoritative empty maps retain removal behavior. Fallible adapters, co-managed abstention and the shared restore lifecycle follow approved master v14/P51 v2. Three source reviews and independent executable-proof review passed, with all-targets/fmt/Clippy/cognitive/layering/structural checks and focused engine controls. All 17 named P51 cases actually passed on Windows, Linux and macOS. All 14 required contexts, 23 check runs and the additional commit status passed on exact tested head. CI run39361331139 attempt2 SUCCESS; the single unchanged Windows failed-job repetition did not reproduce the prior CLI audit assertion. Cause remains unknown; both attempts are preserved.

    The restore oracle does not execute the concrete Wry native body/tail; the accepted shared-boundary proof and native move review apply. P45/P50 stronger verification remains required.

    Epic #2992 remains OPEN: 5/12 delivered (P40/P41/P42/P43/P51), 7 remaining in order: P44#2999, P45#3000, P46#2995, P47#3001, P48#3003, P49#3005, P50#3017. Next P44 starts only after coordinator self-handoff-and-clear and its fresh cold gate. The requested final no-bundle build runs once after all children land. No phase build, install, release or version bump.

    Delivery receipt: project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p51-v14-delivered-pr3137-v1.json.
14. mblua commented on Oct 20, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 20, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    P44 (#2999) delivered through PR #3139; merge/main 9ce147f8454af7ad9d4bd27c1a358f93fd229850. Exact tested tree preserved, all required/triggered checks green, five P44 cases passed on each of Windows/Linux/macOS.

    Progress: 6/12 delivered — P40 (#3053), P41 (#3056), P42 (#3113), P43 (#3119), P51 (#3137), P44 (#3139).

    Remaining sequential phases: P45 #3000, P46 #2995, P47 #3001, P48 #3003, P49 #3005, P50 #3017. Next is P45 after the mandatory safe coordinator handoff and fresh phase gate. Epic remains open. Necessary-only scope retained; one final no-bundle build after all twelve children land.
15. mblua commented on Oct 20, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 20, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    AC-2992-001 — technical rescore of duplicate-configuration admission

    The user explicitly requires refusing an AC configuration document with a repeated exact JSON path at its initial legitimate read, stopping startup or the dependent operation with a user error, and leaving the file for manual correction. This replaces duplicate-tolerant compatibility proposals.

    Scored unit: the additional whole validation/error-propagation change proposed by the architect, not the historical settings-owner remainder (77/100, raw156). Current proposal: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p45-duplicate-json-initial-validation-architect-proposal-v2.md; SHA256 2BC82C7207ECE0F621F78BD3A948A055725A36F1DB9B5229B1C2377FE7EBC797. Source HEAD 9ce147f; source and working tree unchanged. Proposed footprint41 paths, eight new delivery units; combined remaining footprint62 paths. The proposed20-phase partition is NOT approved by this score.

    Category	Score 1–20	Anchor and evidence
    Scope footprint	15	Cross-cutting anchor20 approached: proposed validation physically changes41 existing paths across configuration, app/CLI consumers and four frontend paths; narrower than the historical59-path remainder scored16.
    Diagnosis difficulty	10	Unfamiliar subsystem investigation anchor10: detector cause is known, but documenting infallible/default/partial readers and the startup/naming/seed chains required source investigation across the mapped domains.
    Domain knowledge	14	Above parser/subsystem anchor10: recursive decoded-key semantics, layered capture, legitimate overrides, pre-publication validation, leaf-module contracts and sensitive denial envelopes must stay correct.
    Solution-space ambiguity	8	Below multiple-viable-approaches anchor10: detector reuse is established; nonmechanical propagation and leaf boundaries need a decided design. No new parser/protocol selection or unresolved product choice is included.
    Blast radius and reversibility	17	Toward data/security anchor20: a missed check can normalize/rename/overwrite invalid persisted config, select an unintended fallback or expose a sensitive file path; false positives block startup.
    Dependency and integration load	13	Above one-contract anchor10: checked Result/callback propagation spans existing Rust leaves and host/CLI consumers plus a frontend rejected-help result; no external dependency/version change.
    Verification difficulty	16	Above supported-new-test anchor10: prove no default/partial config use, same bytes before mutation, valid controls, recursive false-positive controls and actual startup/worker error paths with existing fixtures. No new harness assumed.
    State, data and compatibility	15	Above persisted-state anchor10: explicitly reject formerly accepted persisted JSON documents, preserve valid-layer outcomes and all invalid bytes, retain existing successful DTOs and state ownership.
    Concurrency and timing	13	Above clear-async-ownership anchor10: validate same captured bytes before migration/refresh under existing locks, preserve owner/proxy authority and early startup/restore ordering; no new concurrency protocol.
    Environment and tooling	7	Below platform-specific-toolchain anchor10: existing Rust/Node/CI and headless fixtures; visible startup error still differs by OS, without toolchain repair or GUI automation.

    Raw sum 128. Final 62/100 = round((128-10)/190*99)+1. Full band and Full continuation; independent Full criteria are cross-cutting persisted configuration, Rust/frontend ownership and nonmechanical startup/authority ordering. Architect authors; original five participants (architect, Rust, UI, RustGrinch, ArchitectureGrinch) must approve the exact new complete set. Verification16 requires proof review; Blast17 retains full impact review; State15/Concurrency13 retain architect authorship.

    Excluded: issue/branch/PR administration, review rounds/messages, CI waiting, merge/cleanup/versioning/changelog, documentation volume and phase-count ceremony. No runtime PASS, implementation permission, scope waiver or acceptance of eight units is inferred. Six delivered phases remain delivered; all user authorization and source/verification/cold gates remain applicable. Before creating14 self-contained pending specifications, exact source feasibility and minimum-sufficient-scope review of this41-path blueprint will resolve whether its propagation, UI and green cuts are necessary.
16. mblua commented on Oct 20, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 20, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    AC-2992-001 — duplicate-configuration admission, v3 rescore

    Scored unit: Additional whole duplicate-JSON configuration admission and error propagation requirement, proposed D01-D08; separate from the historical E2992 remaining-task score77/raw156.

    Proposal: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p45-duplicate-json-initial-validation-architect-proposal-v3.md
    SHA256: 96F1B6D8158AD8EDA86F704568A47E4977FEFC8CD68E5A83206B42767A65F4E3
    Repo source HEAD: 9ce147f, clean.

    V3 closes the existing menu_guard fixture-consumer omission and specifies initial restore preparation/consumption while retaining asynchronous execution, authority, P51 completion and saved bytes. Footprint: 43 paths in new units, 63 remaining, 92 in the full delivered-plus-pending set. menu_guard was already in delivered P44, so the full set stays92. Twenty phases (six delivered/fourteen pending) remain a proposal, not approval.

    Category	Score 1–20	Anchor/evidence
    Scope footprint	15	Cross-cutting anchor20 approached: proposed validation physically changes43 existing paths across configuration, app/CLI consumers and four frontend paths; narrower than the historical59-path remainder scored16.
    Diagnosis difficulty	10	Unfamiliar subsystem investigation anchor10: detector cause is known, but documenting infallible/default/partial readers and the startup/naming/seed chains required source investigation across the mapped domains.
    Domain knowledge	14	Above parser/subsystem anchor10: recursive decoded-key semantics, layered capture, legitimate overrides, pre-publication validation, leaf-module contracts and sensitive denial envelopes must stay correct.
    Solution-space ambiguity	8	Below multiple-viable-approaches anchor10: detector reuse is established; nonmechanical propagation and leaf boundaries need a decided design. No new parser/protocol selection or unresolved product choice is included.
    Blast radius and reversibility	17	Toward data/security anchor20: a missed check can normalize/rename/overwrite invalid persisted config, select an unintended fallback or expose a sensitive file path; false positives block startup.
    Dependency and integration load	13	Above one-contract anchor10: checked Result/callback propagation spans existing Rust leaves and host/CLI consumers plus a frontend rejected-help result; no external dependency/version change.
    Verification difficulty	16	Above supported-new-test anchor10: prove no default/partial config use, same bytes before mutation, valid controls, recursive false-positive controls and actual startup/worker error paths with existing fixtures. No new harness assumed.
    State, data and compatibility	15	Above persisted-state anchor10: explicitly reject formerly accepted persisted JSON documents, preserve valid-layer outcomes and all invalid bytes, retain existing successful DTOs and state ownership.
    Concurrency and timing	13	Above clear-async-ownership anchor10: validate same captured bytes before migration/refresh under existing locks, preserve owner/proxy authority and early startup/restore ordering; no new concurrency protocol.
    Environment and tooling	7	Below platform-specific-toolchain anchor10: existing Rust/Node/CI and headless fixtures; visible startup error still differs by OS, without toolchain repair or GUI automation.

    Raw 128; final 62/100 = round((128-10)/190*99)+1. Previous additional-requirement score 62/raw128 unchanged. All ten categories reassessed against v3. Existing fixture-consumer adaptation and read-only sessions preparation clarify the same startup-admission contract already scored; scope remains cross-cutting, with no new parser/dependency/transport/concurrency protocol or test harness. No integer anchor/category change justified. Historical remainder77/raw156 is a different unit.

    Excluded ceremony: issue/branch/PR administration; review rounds or message overhead; CI waiting; merges/cleanup/versioning/changelog; documentation volume and phase-count ceremony.

    Full continuation independently applies: persisted cross-cutting contract, Rust/frontend ownership and startup/authority propagation. Vetoes: Verification16 proof review; Blast17 full file-impact visibility; State15 and Concurrency13 architect authorship. Same exact five participants: ac-architect-v5, ac-dev-rust-v5, ac-dev-webpage-ui-v5, ac-dev-rust-grinch-v5, ac-architect-grinch-v5. Immutable complete set and every changed phase require exact consensus; six delivered phases stay delivered. Score does not approve a partition, plan or source.

    Lead proof D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p45-duplicate-json-proposal-v3-lead-verification-v1.json. All63 source/9 support/9 input hashes match; hash verification is not a functional audit of every path. No product executions or source changes. Next formal R15 cold gate precedes author assignment; source remains unauthorized.
17. mblua

    added sub-issues on Oct 21, 2026

    • Settings ownership P52: strict configuration JSON admission (E2992 v23) #3146
    • Settings ownership P53: agent and startup restore admission (E2992 v23) #3147
    • Settings ownership P54: team app configuration admission (E2992 v23) #3148
    • Settings ownership P55: team CLI configuration admission (E2992 v23) #3149
    • Settings ownership P56: co-managed configuration admission (E2992 v23) #3150
    • Settings ownership P57: coding-agent catalog admission (E2992 v23) #3151
    • Settings ownership P58: menus groups and help admission (E2992 v23) #3152
    • Settings ownership P59: visible help configuration rejection (E2992 v23) #3153
18. mblua commented on Oct 21, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 21, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    P52 #3146 stopped before source edits: the frozen recipe requires a duplicate error naming the real file, but identity_reference_value receives only bytes/PhysicalState and its planner has no target paths. This is a missing implementation recipe, not a reason to weaken the required error. Rust report: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-v23-rust-source-result-v1.md SHA256 CB8EB620208B4C0B13EE4F54943D3BD66C35B4E0F771AD861740FA9E21FBB59D. BASE=HEAD 196a4cf; branch refactor/3146-settings-owner-p52-configuration-admission, clean, no commit/push/PR or product checks. Existing P45 branch/base retained.

    Implementation authority is suspended externally for P52-B1. Begin bounded Full R18 author correction, then the same five original exact-set votes and renewed mapping/standing/cold dispatch. Preserve nineteen unrelated phase bytes if no direct contract change requires otherwise. Six delivered phases remain closed; no new child/branch or build.

    Remaining duplicate-admission score: previous62/raw128; reassessed62/raw128 (same unit, no source implemented).

    Category	Score	Matched anchor/reason
    Scope footprint	15	Cross-cutting anchor20 approached: proposed validation physically changes43 existing paths across configuration, app/CLI consumers and four frontend paths; narrower than the historical59-path remainder scored16.
    Diagnosis difficulty	10	Unfamiliar subsystem investigation anchor10: detector cause is known, but documenting infallible/default/partial readers and the startup/naming/seed chains required source investigation across the mapped domains.
    Domain knowledge	14	Above parser/subsystem anchor10: recursive decoded-key semantics, layered capture, legitimate overrides, pre-publication validation, leaf-module contracts and sensitive denial envelopes must stay correct.
    Solution-space ambiguity	8	Below multiple-viable-approaches anchor10: detector reuse is established; nonmechanical propagation and leaf boundaries need a decided design. No new parser/protocol selection or unresolved product choice is included.
    Blast radius and reversibility	17	Toward data/security anchor20: a missed check can normalize/rename/overwrite invalid persisted config, select an unintended fallback or expose a sensitive file path; false positives block startup.
    Dependency and integration load	13	Above one-contract anchor10: checked Result/callback propagation spans existing Rust leaves and host/CLI consumers plus a frontend rejected-help result; no external dependency/version change.
    Verification difficulty	16	Above supported-new-test anchor10: prove no default/partial config use, same bytes before mutation, valid controls, recursive false-positive controls and actual startup/worker error paths with existing fixtures. No new harness assumed.
    State, data and compatibility	15	Above persisted-state anchor10: explicitly reject formerly accepted persisted JSON documents, preserve valid-layer outcomes and all invalid bytes, retain existing successful DTOs and state ownership.
    Concurrency and timing	13	Above clear-async-ownership anchor10: validate same captured bytes before migration/refresh under existing locks, preserve owner/proxy authority and early startup/restore ordering; no new concurrency protocol.
    Environment and tooling	7	Below platform-specific-toolchain anchor10: existing Rust/Node/CI and headless fixtures; visible startup error still differs by OS, without toolchain repair or GUI automation.

    Excluded ceremony: issue/branch/PR administration; review rounds or message overhead; CI waiting; merges/cleanup/versioning/changelog; documentation volume and phase-count ceremony. Historical E2992 remainder77/raw156 is a different unit. All still-required Full/verification/blast/state/concurrency gates remain; not a new optional review or user approval request. Author must flag any concrete scope/anchor change before recertification.

    Rescore receipt: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-b1-remaining-validation-rescore-v1.json
19. mblua commented on Oct 21, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 21, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    P52 #3146 checkpoint preserved; blocked by P52-V25-RUST-B1 (writer String erases duplicate-vs-ordinary cause before checked coordinator). Architect Q&A: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-v25-coordinator-error-channel-architect-qa-v1.md SHAA886296F7F834B8480A1BDAEDC651883363E03B41D200E23BB127D0F0A9314C7. Proposed internal typed transport is not yet approved. Source suspended; ten partial outputs match snapshots, actual diff+436/-106 (the report prose+536 was a count typo), BASE=HEAD196a4cf4, no commit/push/PR or product execution. Proof D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-v25-partial-source-lead-verification-v1.json SHA2D88CECF7DBE616DB46DBFB53B9BFD5492C9E6D8DF7C6B4D7C845CA1DE5A0C56.

    Scope classification D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-v25-coordinator-error-channel-scope-classification-v1.json: existing user requirement and in-scope standing authority cover the internal correction; no new product policy or user decision. Frozen technical design must still be revised and approved by the same five participants, with mapping/standing/cold gate before code. Preserve partial outputs/branch/BASE, no reset/reapply. Full R20 authoring only after concrete reports, idle and successful cold gate.

    Remaining duplicate-admission score: previous62/raw128 -> current62/raw128. Historical owner-task77/raw156 is a different unit.

    Category	Score	Matched anchor/reason
    Scope footprint	15	Cross-cutting anchor20 approached: proposed validation physically changes43 existing paths across configuration, app/CLI consumers and four frontend paths; narrower than the historical59-path remainder scored16. All43 paths remain in unlanded remaining adaptation/verification; partial edits are not a completed phase.
    Diagnosis difficulty	10	Unfamiliar subsystem investigation anchor10: detector cause is known, but documenting infallible/default/partial readers and the startup/naming/seed chains required source investigation across the mapped domains. String-erasure root cause is now located; the wider existing reader/startup propagation analysis remains in this unit.
    Domain knowledge	14	Above parser/subsystem anchor10: recursive decoded-key semantics, layered capture, legitimate overrides, pre-publication validation, leaf-module contracts and sensitive denial envelopes must stay correct.
    Solution-space ambiguity	8	Below multiple-viable-approaches anchor10: detector reuse is established; nonmechanical propagation and leaf boundaries need a decided design. No new parser/protocol selection or unresolved product choice is included. One architect proposal is concrete; it remains to be made canonical, no user product choice.
    Blast radius and reversibility	17	Toward data/security anchor20: a missed check can normalize/rename/overwrite invalid persisted config, select an unintended fallback or expose a sensitive file path; false positives block startup.
    Dependency and integration load	13	Above one-contract anchor10: checked Result/callback propagation spans existing Rust leaves and host/CLI consumers plus a frontend rejected-help result; no external dependency/version change. Four existing writer/repair/consumer paths need shared classified transport, without new service or import pair.
    Verification difficulty	16	Above supported-new-test anchor10: prove no default/partial config use, same bytes before mutation, valid controls, recursive false-positive controls and actual startup/worker error paths with existing fixtures. No new harness assumed. Preserve ordinary errors even when their text resembles the duplicate marker, plus D/S pending cases, within existing fixtures.
    State, data and compatibility	15	Above persisted-state anchor10: explicitly reject formerly accepted persisted JSON documents, preserve valid-layer outcomes and all invalid bytes, retain existing successful DTOs and state ownership. Internal enum changes are not a serialized format migration; ordinary omission/repair behavior stays.
    Concurrency and timing	13	Above clear-async-ownership anchor10: validate same captured bytes before migration/refresh under existing locks, preserve owner/proxy authority and early startup/restore ordering; no new concurrency protocol.
    Environment and tooling	7	Below platform-specific-toolchain anchor10: existing Rust/Node/CI and headless fixtures; visible startup error still differs by OS, without toolchain repair or GUI automation.

    Excluded ceremony: issue/branch/PR administration; review rounds or message overhead; CI waiting; merges/cleanup/versioning/changelog; documentation volume and phase-count ceremony. Same Full/verification/blast/state/concurrency gates. New rescore receipt D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-coordinator-remaining-rescore-v1.json.
20. mblua commented on Oct 21, 2026

    

    mblua

    on Oct 21, 2026

    OwnerAuthor

    More actions

    R20 execution return P52-V26-METADATA-WORKSPACE: Cargo metadata and root [workspace] agree on repository root;13 pending recipes expected src-tauri. Architect Q&A proposes an exact documentary correction, preserving target/executable containment and stop-on-error. No product/manifests change.

    Remaining duplicate-admission technical score reassessed: previous62/raw128 -> current62/raw128; categories15/10/14/8/17/13/16/15/13/7. Same43new/63pending/92global paths and14pending phases. P52 commit1d5f6b9 is preserved; source completion/no-run with sequencing deviation does not discharge runtime/guards/integration/graph/CI obligations. Document copies/review ceremony do not raise technical score. Full/vetoes preserved.

    Proposal: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-v26-metadata-workspace-architect-qa-v1.json
    Reassessment: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-metadata-remaining-rescore-v1.json SHA456EFD969A98448466BDE1601195B135D5E055A40E77DB9D8BEAD138FC731F85
    Scope classification: D:/0_repos/AgentsCommander_iac/.ac/project-shared/2992-settings-owner/minimum-path-20261016/p52-metadata-correction-scope-v1.json SHA5408A54544EC93DB4A13EAF0C91EC686741E50DCF83DE1374BBC08434F9EDEFB
    R20 five exact approvals remain historical; corrected bytes require R21 exact recertification. No additional user authorization needed within standing scope. Source and product checks stay suspended pending the applicable gates.