Round the nav's community counts, exact count on hover - #146
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. WalkthroughrenderStats displays numeric counts in English compact notation with at most one fractional digit. For each numeric value, it sets the closest enclosing link’s title to the exact localized count and the corresponding GitHub stars or Discord members label. Missing values leave elements unchanged. Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to Navigation counts are more compact, with exact totals available in link titles. The supplied context establishes no actionable merge risk. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Merging. Reviews: Codex had no findings and CodeRabbit had no actionable comments. I skipped CodeRabbit's docstring-coverage warning because (written by Opus 5.5) |
1.5k starsinstead of1,538 stars.1,538 GitHub stars.Same change on moq.pro and doc.moq.dev.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
(written by Opus 5.5)