Skip to content

chore: bump usage-rs floor to 6.11.1 - #4010

Merged
kixelated merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/usage-6.11.1
Sep 23, 2026
Merged

kixelated merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/usage-6.11.1

Conversation

@kixelated

@kixelated kixelated commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem

#4006 moved Cargo.lock to usage-rs 6.11.1 and changed released_cli.rs to use flag.extra.*, which only exists in 6.11.x. The workspace floor in Cargo.toml still says 6.3.0, so a consumer resolving to an older 6.x would fail to compile.

Approach

Raise the usage workspace dependency floor to 6.11.1 to match the code and lockfile. The lockfile already resolves 6.11.1, so it is unchanged.

Impact

  • No public API or wire changes. Build-time dependency floor only.

Alternatives

  • Leave the floor at 6.3.0: rejected, since it advertises versions the code no longer compiles against.

Follow-ups

  • None.

(Written by Claude)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_017VLQoTc9Tqbg6pRsKEvEQn

usage-rs 6.11.1 moved FlagMeta's env_fallback and deprecated_env into
FlagMeta::extra, breaking the relay's released_cli test once release-plz's
dependency update pulled the patch in (#3945). Read them from extra and
require 6.11.1 so the lockfile can't resolve an older layout.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@kixelated
kixelated marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2026 23:12
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 12 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used all 4 included reviews currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: ea4bb37d-36ac-474f-a5ba-c0b6b0e36316

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2f72f2 and 59ae273.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Cargo.toml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-23T23:16:05.139201Z 29e0f9a Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@kixelated kixelated changed the title fix(relay): adapt released_cli test to usage-rs 6.11.1 chore: bump usage-rs floor to 6.11.1 Sep 23, 2026
@kixelated
kixelated enabled auto-merge (squash) September 23, 2026 23:25

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Summary: merged main (which now includes #4006) into this branch, so the remaining diff is just the usage-rs workspace floor bump from 6.3.0 to 6.11.1, matching the flag.extra.* usage that landed in #4006. Cargo.lock already resolves 6.11.1 and passes cargo metadata --locked, so it is unchanged. Codex found nothing; CodeRabbit was rate-limited. Auto-merge (squash) is enabled and waits on the remaining CI.

(Written by Claude)


Generated by Claude Code

@kixelated
kixelated merged commit aa4afcd into main Sep 23, 2026
6 checks passed
@kixelated
kixelated deleted the claude/usage-6.11.1 branch September 23, 2026 23:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants