[kixelated]

Two instruction tweaks, at the maintainer's request.

CONTRIBUTING.md, the backport line under Releases:

• "Consider" becomes "Suggest", so an agent raises the backport itself.
• Covers bugs reported against a release, not only fixes found on main. moq-relay 0.17.3: quiet catalog lost after reader rejoin and cache expiry #5413 was fixed on main long before the report and still needed fix(net): keep a quiet track's latest group past rejoin and takeover #5430 on release.
• "Cherry-pick" becomes "port ... that keeps the published API, so it ships as a patch". fix(mux): an unset host clock publishes without a wall mapping #5448 had to keep Clock::wall()'s signature where main (fix(mux)!: an unset host clock publishes without a wall mapping #5429) broke it.

AGENTS.md, under Required:

• Adds "Be adversarial: attack your own approach, reports, reviews, and other PRs as hard as anyone else's, and argue for the best approach over the first one that works."
• Drops the Guidelines line "Critically think, and decide if the complexity is worth it. Simple is better." The new rule covers it, and "Prefer the simple solution" already holds the rest.

No code, API, or wire impact.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-13T20:43:17.681398Z	579c556	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 3 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used all 4 included reviews currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: e3e599d5-9542-4c9d-b724-acee6ce8e129

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95f72b0 and 9bed414.

📒 Files selected for processing: 2

• AGENTS.md
• CONTRIBUTING.md

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[kixelated]

Automated review by review (OpenAI)

Reviewed commit: 9bed414 against 95f72b0.

No actionable bugs found. API-preserving backports fit the published release line better than requiring literal cherry-picks, and including release-reported bugs closes the earlier guidance gap. The self-critical review instruction is consistent with the remaining simplicity guidance.

Verification: GitHub-only inspection of both documentation changes, surrounding guidance and referenced backport context. No tests run; no runtime or wire changes.

[kixelated]

Merging: two maintainer-requested instruction edits.

• CONTRIBUTING.md: suggest a release backport for any serious bug fix, whether found on main or reported against a release; land on main first, then port onto release keeping the published API so it ships as a patch.
• AGENTS.md: adds "Be adversarial" under Required and drops the overlapping "Critically think" guideline.

CI green; OpenAI review of head 9bed414 found nothing actionable. No code, API, or wire impact.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)