[kixelated]

Plans the follow-ups from moq-dev/moq#7016 and moq-dev/moq#7015:

• m1: Withdrawn advertisements stop [S]. A withdrawn moq-transport namespace releases its state even when the peer withholds credit; this is fix(net): end moq-transport requests stalled on send credit #7016's fix applied to the publisher. It follows Rust FETCH parity, which edits the same file.
• m1/interop-coverage: JS subscribers FETCH [M]. @moq/net fetches past groups and recovers a mid-group join over moq-transport, and JS subscribers join the CLI FETCH round. It builds on JS ranges.
• m0/ci: Out-of-crate targets [S]. Branch checks format and lint a crate whose target file lives outside it, such as the Rust interop clients.

The Node polyfill bugs went to moq-dev/web-transport as moq-dev/web-transport#471.

Decisions

Namespace withdraw:

• ✅ [S] m1, after fix(net): answer IETF FETCH as the JS publisher does #6999
• Fold into request-lease

JS subscriber FETCH:

• ✅ [M] m1, after JS ranges
• [M] m2
• Two quests

Interop gaps: the draft-18 cancel spelling is dropped, since Rust and JS both accept a FIN or a reset as a draft-18 cancel.

• ✅ [S] m0/ci, drop the cancel item
• [S] m1, drop the cancel item
• Both as quests

Public API: none. Wire: none (quest-only).

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 3 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used all 4 included reviews currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: acc377c3-1de7-4a72-8ccd-569ed14999d6

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab1c8ba and 7ce5ac8.

Files selected for processing: 6

• quest/m0/ci/README.md
• quest/m0/ci/out-of-crate-targets.md
• quest/m1/README.md
• quest/m1/ietf-withdraw-credit.md
• quest/m1/interop-coverage/README.md
• quest/m1/interop-coverage/js-ietf-fetch.md

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T17:00:15.591820Z	7ce5ac8	New commits

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[kixelated]

Automated review by review (OpenAI)
Reviewed commit: e81b904

No actionable bugs found in these plans. Separating withdrawal/backpressure safety from JS FETCH interoperability keeps the work focused, and deriving out-of-crate targets from Cargo metadata is preferable to a moq-cli special case. The stated gaps match the current publisher write waits, JS subscriber limitations, and branch-selection filters; the plans do not claim those runtime gaps are fixed.

Verification: static inspection of the six changed planning files, referenced prerequisites, and relevant implementation paths only. No tests, builds, or interoperability runs executed.

[kixelated]

Merging. Adds three quests (quest/m1/ietf-withdraw-credit.md, quest/m1/interop-coverage/js-ietf-fetch.md, quest/m0/ci/out-of-crate-targets.md) with matching README entries, as settled in the 2026-10-28 interview. Codex reviewed e81b904 with no findings, and quest check --base origin/main passes.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)