[kixelated]

Summary

This plans three of the follow-ups from the decision inbox PR (#144) as two quests:

• [M] quest/m0/kix/harness.md: one checked-in command that serves the real Worker locally, using Miniflare with local D1 and R2, mocked GitHub, a local sign-in and seeded inbox state, so agents can check UI changes in a browser. wrangler dev hangs in the agent sandbox today. The seed and mock are meant to become the base for the kix epic's stubbed end-to-end test. It ranks first in the kix epic.
• [XS] quest/m0/kix/answer-flow.md: after an answer, move to the next active decision with an "Answer recorded" notice, and give the refused-action page a neutral title. It ranks after the co-maintainer inbox.

Both quests require quest/m0/kix/prompts.md, which #144 deletes. Whichever of the two PRs merges second must drop that Required entry.

Planning decisions

Inbox polish: after an answer, go to the next decision, and use a neutral refusal title. How should these be planned?

• ✅ One [XS] quest (Recommended)
• Two quests
• Stay on the item and plan only the title fix

Agent UI testing: how should agents run the inbox in a browser?

• ✅ A seeded local harness (Recommended)
• Fix wrangler dev in the sandbox
• Both

Rank: where do the new quests go?

• ✅ The harness at the top of the kix epic, and polish after the co-maintainer inbox (Recommended)
• Polish first
• Both at the end

Checks

quest check, just check and just test pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-19T15:26:57.707928Z	accb703	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-19T15:27:10.252979Z	accb703	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[kixelated]

Merge summary:

• Plans quest/m0/kix/harness.md ([M], first in the kix epic) and quest/m0/kix/answer-flow.md ([XS], after the co-maintainer inbox), with kix README links.
• Main (with feat(worker): retain raw agent output in R2 with a per-attempt cap #142) was merged into the branch at 70263a7. The kix README conflict keeps the Answer flow entry and drops Output retention, since feat(worker): retain raw agent output in R2 with a per-attempt cap #142 deleted output.md.
• feat(worker): make the decision inbox the signed-in home #144 is still open, so both quests keep /quest/m0/kix/prompts.md under Required for now. feat(worker): make the decision inbox the signed-in home #144 must drop that entry (and the then-empty Required sections) when it merges after this.
• Codex code and security review on accb703 found nothing; the only change since is the mechanical main merge. CI passes on 70263a7, and quest check, just check, and just test pass locally.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)