[kixelated]

Plans the follow-ups that the 2026-11-02 /quest-spawn session's 37 agents suggested and that evidence showed are real problems. Partway through, the user asked the coordinator to stop interviewing them one by one: "you just decide the follow-ups please. Check the merge history and transcripts to figure out if these are real problems and decide how to fix them". So the user answered F1–F4 and F5's milestone, and the coordinator decided the rest from merge history, GitHub, the code, and the maintainer's Claude Code and Codex transcripts.

New quests

m0, in the kix sandbox epic

• [S] kix/sandbox/seccomp.md (urgent). nixpkgs' sandbox-runtime 0.0.81 ships without its apply-seccomp helper, so srt runs with Unix-socket blocking disabled. Run with the runner's settings, nix store ping --store daemon succeeded inside srt, and kixelated is a trusted Nix user. A job's commands could therefore reach the daemon's root-level options. No runner was deployed on this host yet. Ranked first in the epic. srt's always-writable /tmp/claude is folded in, along with a check that a command inherits no Unix socket besides its stdio, since the filter blocks only creating one.
• [M] kix/sandbox/claude-boundary.md. Claude Code jobs get test(runner): check the opencode sandbox's boundary in CI #404's hostile-repository test, with a fake model set as the account's endpoint in its home's user settings, since the runner strips an ambient ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL. It requires the seccomp fix and test(runner): check the opencode sandbox's boundary in CI #404's test, whose probe and layout it reuses. A check that TMPDIR points inside the job's directory is folded in.
• [S] kix/sandbox/trust-on-queue.md. Raised by feat(kix): approve an exact PR head for host runners #402; the user approved the goal and m0.

m0, elsewhere

• [S] review-quota.md. quest review exits with a distinct status on a reviewer's usage limit and prints the reset time: exit 3 and one stderr line with an ISO 8601 reset or unknown. Raised by docs(guide): block on long waits, record pre-existing failures, and wait out reviewer outages #411; the user approved the goal and m0.
• [S] waiting-drafts.md. quest waiting also lists open draft PRs' ## Waiting items, and /quest-unblock keeps its per-draft hold check. Raised by docs(guide): block on long waits, record pre-existing failures, and wait out reviewer outages #411; the user approved the goal and m0.
• [XS] decision-records.md. Recorded decisions label the rejected options. Raised by feat(skills): keep /quest-spawn finding work and resume leftover branches #416; the user approved the goal and m0.
• [M] session-checkouts.md. SessionEnd and SessionStart hooks release and reclaim a session's checkout. The SessionEnd timeout covers a measured release, and a release that fails or is cut short stays reserved until the next SessionStart finishes it. Claude's own session worktrees already pile up: 32 in moq.pro, 21 in moq, 3 here. Raised by fix(worktree): check out PR heads and release workflow agents' checkouts #425.
• [XS] claude-rm-upstream.md. File an anthropics/claude-code issue about claude rm advising git worktree unlock. No existing upstream issue covers it. It waits on the maintainer's approval to post outside the two orgs.

m1

• [S] release.md. v0.1.0 lacks quest worktree hook, so SETUP.md's release routes install hooks that fail. The quest's first step adds that caveat to SETUP.md, and the release bumps package.json before tagging. moq-dev's repositories all pin through the flake, so this matters only to third-party adopters. Raised by feat(claude): install the worktree hooks in this repository #423.

Fixed in their own PRs instead

Each of these is relevant to the PR that raised it, so the evidence went to that PR as a comment for its next iterate:

• moq-dev/quest#417: the runner review blocks the event loop with synchronous git fetch, and runners have no pinned codex.
• moq-dev/quest#419: GraphQL FORBIDDEN/INSUFFICIENT_SCOPES/NOT_FOUND errors read as "refused"; move UNREFUSED to the shared code.
• moq-dev/quest#406: deterministic environment and base failures are recorded as flaky and could auto-disable real tests (seen on feat(gate): admit quick commands and land checks ahead of load #324, moq#7560 and moq#7221). Also, the epic's end-to-end condition should cover the first disable PR.
• moq-dev/quest#423: quest init should warn when quest isn't on a plain PATH.

Dropped (hypothetical, with evidence)

• BEHIND as ready (feat(land watch): enqueue armed picks GitHub never queued #405): every moq-dev ruleset has strict_required_status_checks_policy: false, so GitHub never reports BEHIND.
• The review model id on Bedrock, Vertex and Foundry (feat(review): keep the reviewer's gateway and cloud-provider routing #424): no maintainer route uses them; the only route is the local gateway, which accepts the id.
• Reading workflow files in kix's CI check (kix: warn when pull-request CI can write, and write down trust by stage #434): no pilot repository has a privileged PR-head checkout. Its secrets are already listed.
• Classic branch protection (kix: warn when pull-request CI can write, and write down trust by stage #434): every pilot returns 404 "Branch not protected"; they use rulesets with no review rule.
• Gate scopes leaking on SIGKILL (fix(gate): cancelling a gate stops its active phase #429): 9,791 gate scopes since 10-29, and none outlived its gate.
• The Worker's readTarget on superseded runs (fix(status): judge landing and checks as they are now #413): already in quest/m0/latest-check-runs.md.

Decision prompts (user)

• F1 goal: ✅ Plan as stated (rejected: Drop it). F1 milestone: ✅ m0 (rejected: m1, m2)
• F2 goal: ✅ Plan as stated (rejected: Drop it). F2 milestone: ✅ m0 (rejected: m1, m2)
• F3 goal: ✅ Plan as stated (rejected: Drop it). F3 milestone: ✅ m0 (rejected: m1, m2)
• F4 goal: ✅ Plan as stated (rejected: Drop it). F4 milestone: ✅ m0 (rejected: m1, m2)
• F5 milestone: ✅ m0. Its goal prompt was answered with the instruction above, and the evidence moved F5 into feat(kix): enqueue ready PRs on a merge-queue base #419.
• Where should the SETUP.md worktree-hook caveat live? (user, /quest-complete, 2026-11-03): ✅ Keep it as the first step of quest/m1/release.md (rejected: its own m0 quest)

Merge with main (2026-11-03)

Merged origin/main at d7ef15ec. The m0 and kix sandbox link lists dropped the quests main finished (head-approval, follow-ups-as-reports, prompt-context, coordinator-control, spawn-refill) and took main's rewritten worktree-routes entry. release.md now notes that moq-dev/quest#425 landed while #423 is still open. The rest of the new quests were rechecked against what landed and still hold: kix still rechecks trust only at assignment after #402, the flake's srt still has no apply-seccomp after #435, the skills still label no rejected options after #416, and the README documents session checkouts as unreleased after #425.

Review

mechanical fix by quest land watch: merged main at 5bcc01b183478b8290e0627e748ea7d3af39c01a with the quest merge driver (head 4610bda)

mechanical fix by quest land watch: merged main at 9eec52d37513af3930ff1b06a20990ef45db9f01 with the quest merge driver (head 0e1ba69)

mechanical fix by quest land watch: merged main at 4c728f1a8dd8a80c60cfac97e6a24425b3f04ef5 with the quest merge driver (head d895a83)

• Reviewer: Codex gpt-6.1-sol, medium effort, via quest review --base origin/main (session 01a19fe7-ccd6-7e81-87c9-60aac6845cf3)
• Round 2 on head b832ad6822e734e5547dd338d8cbd19152af4dda (base d7ef15ec), after the merge with main: no findings
• Earlier rounds (session 01a1a1ee-b48a-7592-82d4-bab21ebd4375): one finding on 158df7b1, fixed (claude-boundary.md now requires seccomp.md and live-test.md); none on 89796399
• CodeRabbit's seven findings on b59e2a17: six fixed and one partly refuted (release.md:30 misread the plan; its step now comes first). Each has a reply on its thread.
• Local: quest check (80 documents ok) passed on the merge; just check passed on 89796399, and the PR's own diff since then is Markdown only

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Important

• Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: aa7c275b-20a4-4eb2-98dd-4d074d131614

Walkthrough

The pull request adds m0 requirements and planning documents for review quota reporting, draft-PR waiting items, decision records, session checkouts, upstream reporting, and sandbox checks. It also adds an m1 release requirement and plan for quest worktree hook. These changes document proposed work and requirements; they do not implement the described behaviors.

Merge Risk: Low · previous review b59e2

This PR only adds planning documents, so nothing changes at runtime. Before relying on the plans, fix the release plan's claim about SETUP.md and specify how the fake-model endpoint reaches Claude Code in the sandbox test plan. The remaining comments are small plan clarifications.

Pre-merge checks: 4

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check		The title "quest: plan the 2026-11-02 spawn's follow-ups" matches the main change: the PR adds planning documents for follow-ups from the 2026-11-02 /quest-spawn session. It is specific enough for a t…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description check		The description explains the PR's purpose: planning follow-up quests from the 2026-11-02 /quest-spawn session, with each new quest, dropped hypotheses, decisions, and review evidence. It matches the c…

Full details: Title check

Explanation

The title "quest: plan the 2026-11-02 spawn's follow-ups" matches the main change: the PR adds planning documents for follow-ups from the 2026-11-02 /quest-spawn session. It is specific enough for a teammate scanning history. It does not name the individual quests, but that level of detail is not required.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the PR's purpose: planning follow-up quests from the 2026-11-02 /quest-spawn session, with each new quest, dropped hypotheses, decisions, and review evidence. It matches the changeset, which adds and edits quest planning Markdown files under quest/m0, quest/m1, and kix/sandbox.

Finishing Touches

Simplify code

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

CodeRabbit Verify

• Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.

Recent review info

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: cac31772-f295-4140-a88d-1623d67342f5

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acb8682 and b59e2a1.

Files selected for processing: 12

• quest/m0/README.md
• quest/m0/claude-rm-upstream.md
• quest/m0/decision-records.md
• quest/m0/kix/sandbox/README.md
• quest/m0/kix/sandbox/claude-boundary.md
• quest/m0/kix/sandbox/seccomp.md
• quest/m0/kix/sandbox/trust-on-queue.md
• quest/m0/review-quota.md
• quest/m0/session-checkouts.md
• quest/m0/waiting-drafts.md
• quest/m1/README.md
• quest/m1/release.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

[coderabbitai]

• Fix comments: Fix CodeRabbit comments on this PR

[moq-bot]

quest land watch: the merge queue removed this pull request at b832ad6 because it conflicts with main (merge_conflict).

The land fixer works on it in the background, and the watcher re-enqueues it at the back of the queue once it is fixed or judged flaky, or hands it back here with what it needs.

(written by quest land watch)

[moq-bot]

quest land watch: armed auto-merge on this pull request at d895a83, so it joins the back of the merge queue once its required checks pass, with main at 4c728f1 merged in by the quest merge driver.

(written by quest land watch)

[moq-bot]

quest land watch: the merge queue removed this pull request at d895a83 because it conflicts with main (merge_conflict).

The land fixer works on it in the background, and the watcher re-enqueues it at the back of the queue once it is fixed or judged flaky, or hands it back here with what it needs.

(written by quest land watch)

[moq-bot]

quest land watch: armed auto-merge on this pull request at 0e1ba69, so it joins the back of the merge queue once its required checks pass, with main at 9eec52d merged in by the quest merge driver.

(written by quest land watch)

[moq-bot]

quest land watch: the merge queue removed this pull request at 0e1ba69 because it conflicts with main (merge_conflict).

The land fixer works on it in the background, and the watcher re-enqueues it at the back of the queue once it is fixed or judged flaky, or hands it back here with what it needs.

(written by quest land watch)

[moq-bot]

quest land watch: armed auto-merge on this pull request at 4610bda, so it joins the back of the merge queue once its required checks pass, with main at 5bcc01b merged in by the quest merge driver.

(written by quest land watch)