Repository navigation
quest: plan the follow-ups of #73 and #74 - #75
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 9 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
kixelated
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Automated review by review (OpenAI)
Reviewed 7d365b7 against 306e114. No actionable findings.
The three follow-up plans capture the outstanding issues from #73/#74 without treating the X11 or loader fixes as solving them. Direction is sound: reproduce and fix teardown/test failures at their causes, include helper descendants and every desktop, and recheck current nightly failures before implementation. The linked nightly run is confirmed failed.
Verification: GitHub-only review of all four changed planning files and the source PR context. No implementation changes, quest context, tests, hardware reproduction, or independent validation of the entire nightly failure history. These plans are not evidence that the failures are fixed.
(Written by review (OpenAI))

Summary
Plans three m0 fix quests suggested by moq-dev/studio#73 and moq-dev/studio#74. All three join m0 under the rule that fixes join m0:
cookies_survive_a_restart, and the X11 clipboard test.No public API or wire impact; quest files only.
Decisions
Review
Codex (gpt-6.1-sol, medium effort), round 1 on head
7d365b7aed76eb1b4ce4250e4760c199023d4b58: no findings.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)