Skip to content

fix(mcp): clarify delegation parent and result delivery - #151

Merged
EvilWeasel merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/delegation-parent-contract-clarity-20261113
Nov 13, 2026
Merged

EvilWeasel merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/delegation-parent-contract-clarity-20261113

Conversation

@EvilWeasel

@EvilWeasel EvilWeasel commented Nov 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

t3_thread_send with delegation could be mistaken for a normal child follow-up, leaving the caller waiting for a result published in the target thread. Clarify target-thread ownership, result publication and the lack of automatic caller resumption; point normal child continuations and caller-owned independent work to their respective paths.

The change contains two metadata descriptions and two anonymized cases in the existing MCP tool-use eval. Runtime behavior and schema fields stay unchanged, and the total tool-list context budget is unchanged.

Validation on Boat: the advertised schema differs only in the two descriptions; check:integration passes format, lint and all 10 adjacent tests. The existing independent-admission and completed-child follow-up cases also pass.

Native Sol A/B used ultra / priority, three samples per case and text version, with exactly 12 unique model starts. Both frozen arms scored 3/6 because the original oracle incorrectly required an exact message string and rejected the required Kurz: prefix. After removing unrelated wording checks, all six samples per arm satisfy the API/parent/receipt checks on the same immutable trajectories. Exported model inputs are byte-identical before and after this oracle correction; no model samples were rerun. The baseline already chose the correct routing, so this does not demonstrate a causal model-behavior improvement. Tool execution in this eval is simulated; actual child execution and result delivery are outside this evidence.

Model: gpt-6.1-sol. Harness: Codex through T3 Code.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-13T14:53:46.410733Z dea1998 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dea1998878

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@EvilWeasel
EvilWeasel merged commit 05d6c4f into main Nov 13, 2026
11 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant