Repository navigation
templates/assembly-root/scripts/bootstrap.py: a tracking branch behind the pin is fast-forwarded to it, and a fresh clone's branch past the pin with no commit of its own is moved back to it, so bump-leg.py then make bootstrap, and git clone --recurse-submodules then make bootstrap, leave the leg on its branch AT the pin, no longer detached under not moving an existing branch (#475) - #490
Conversation
… tip is an ancestor of the pin is fast-forwarded to it, so `bump-leg.py` then `make bootstrap` leaves the leg on its branch AT the new pin, no longer detached under `not moving an existing branch` (#475) Bootstrap put a leg on its tracking branch only when no local branch of that name existed. Once a project had been bootstrapped, which is every project setup.sh makes, `bump-leg.py` left the leg detached at the new pin over a `main` still at the old one, and the next bootstrap printed `PIN <new> != branch main tip <old>` and `not moving an existing branch`, exited 0 and left the leg detached. AGENTS.md, README, bump-leg.py's own last line and every project's AGENTS-shape.md say it re-places the leg on its tracking branch at the new pin. The next commit made in the leg was on no branch. `checkout_tracking_branch` now asks `git merge-base --is-ancestor <tip> <pin>` before it refuses, and a branch that is behind goes to the new `fast_forward_to_pin`: - HEAD on the tracking branch: `git merge --ff-only <pin>`, which moves the working tree too, and moves nothing when a local change or an untracked file is in the way. - HEAD detached at the pin, as bump-leg.py and `git submodule update` leave it: `git branch -f <branch> <pin>`, then `git checkout <branch>`. Not `checkout -B`: measured on git 2.43, it resets a branch another worktree of the leg has checked out, where `branch -f` refuses. - Any other checkout is not moved off: a commit made on the detached leg after the bump would be left only in the reflog, and a leg on another branch is somebody's work. The line says what to do. - A move git refuses prints git's own lines under the message, and nothing else is tried. - A branch holding a commit the pin lacks, ahead or diverged, is never moved and keeps its two lines, unchanged. - Each new line spells the branch, the other branch it names and git's lines with `spelled`, as #391 has every value bootstrap prints. Unchanged: a leg with no local branch (created at the pin), a branch whose tip is the pin, the pin itself, steps (b) to (d), and the family holder's bootstrap.py, which puts no member on a branch at all. This changes a pinned template, so the sha256 every project pins for scripts/bootstrap.py moves, and `update-shape.py check` reports the file as upstream-changed. No test pins that digest. tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py goes the way a person does: scaffold, clone, bootstrap, a new leg commit, bump-leg.py, bootstrap. Eight tests, git and Python only, so they run on Linux, macOS and Windows. Left out: shape-doctor.py's two docstrings still say bootstrap never moves an existing branch whose tip is not the pin; a branch whose tip IS the pin is still checked out over a commit made on a detached leg, as before. Lane: openreposhape-3 (openRepoShape-3) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Sorry @brettheap, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days. You can request another review in 1 hour by commenting |
Reviewer's GuideBootstrap now safely fast-forwards an existing tracking branch to an advanced pin when the branch is strictly behind, while preserving local work and Git safety refusals in all other checkout states. A new cross-platform end-to-end test module covers the bump-then-bootstrap workflow, refusal cases, worktree safety, and output spelling. Sequence diagram for bootstrap fast-forwarding a tracking branchsequenceDiagram
participant Bootstrap
participant Git
participant Leg
Bootstrap->>Git: merge-base --is-ancestor local pin
alt branch tip is behind pin
Bootstrap->>Leg: fast_forward_to_pin
alt HEAD is on tracking branch
Bootstrap->>Git: merge --ff-only pin
alt Git accepts move
Git-->>Bootstrap: success
Bootstrap-->>Leg: branch now points at pin
else Git refuses move
Git-->>Bootstrap: refusal lines
Bootstrap-->>Leg: keep checkout unchanged
end
else HEAD is detached at pin
Bootstrap->>Git: branch -f branch pin
alt branch move succeeds
Bootstrap->>Git: checkout branch
Git-->>Bootstrap: success
Bootstrap-->>Leg: checkout tracking branch at pin
else Git refuses branch move
Git-->>Bootstrap: refusal lines
Bootstrap-->>Leg: keep checkout unchanged
end
else checkout is elsewhere
Bootstrap-->>Leg: do not move checkout
end
else branch tip is ahead or diverged
Bootstrap-->>Leg: print PIN mismatch and do not move branch
end
Flow diagram for tracking branch fast-forward during bootstrapflowchart TD
A[checkout_tracking_branch] --> B[_is_ancestor local pin]
B -->|no| C[Print PIN != branch tip]
C --> D[Do not move existing branch]
B -->|yes| E[fast_forward_to_pin]
E --> F{Checkout state}
F -->|HEAD on tracking branch| G[git merge --ff-only pin]
F -->|HEAD detached at pin| H[git branch -f branch pin]
H --> I[git checkout branch]
F -->|Other branch or detached commit| J[Print checkout location and do not move it]
G --> K{Git accepts move}
I --> K
K -->|yes| L[Print branch fast-forwarded to pin]
K -->|no| M[Print git refusal and stop]
File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
(lane openRepoShape-3, 2026-10-12T22:30Z) @codex review |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e5d7a3a81d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| head = _try_git(["rev-parse", "--verify", "--quiet", "HEAD"], sub) | ||
| current = _try_git(["symbolic-ref", "--quiet", "HEAD"], sub) | ||
| if current == f"refs/heads/{branch}": | ||
| why = _git_says(["merge", "--ff-only", "-q", pin], sub) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Disable autostash for the bootstrap fast-forward
When the user has merge.autostash=true and local edits conflict with changes between the branch tip and the pin, this git merge fast-forwards the branch, reapplies the automatic stash with conflicts, and still exits 0. _git_says consequently discards Git's conflict warning and bootstrap reports a successful fast-forward while leaving unmerged files and an autostash entry; this reproduces on Git 2.43. Git's documentation explicitly warns that applying the stash after a successful merge may cause conflicts, so pass --no-autostash here to preserve the intended all-or-nothing handling of dirty worktrees. Git merge documentation
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(lane openRepoShape-3, 2026-10-12T23:56Z) Fixed in b247dec: the on-branch fast-forward is now git -c merge.autostash=false merge --ff-only -q <pin> (-c rather than --no-autostash, which a git before 2.27 rejects), so a conflicting tracked edit is refused with git's own lines and nothing moves, with or without merge.autostash=true. tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py covers both runs and asserts the branch unmoved, git stash list empty and nothing unmerged.
…with `merge.autostash` off and moves a fresh clone's leg branch that is past the pin with no commit of its own back to the pin, so a refused fast-forward no longer leaves a conflicted leg under a success line and `git clone --recurse-submodules` then `make bootstrap` no longer leaves the leg detached (#475) Fix round on #490, for the review and codex's P1 on its first commit. - HEAD on the tracking branch, behind the pin: the fast-forward is now `git -c merge.autostash=false merge --ff-only -q <pin>`. With `merge.autostash=true` in a person's config, git stashed a local edit to a file the move changes, fast-forwarded, applied the stash back into conflicts and exited 0, and bootstrap printed `fast-forwarded` over an unmerged leg with an `autostash` entry. Now it refuses as it does without the setting, and nothing moves. `-c`, not `--no-autostash`, which a git before 2.27 rejects as an unknown option. - `branch -f` worked and `checkout` was refused (a stale index.lock): the line said git "refused to move it" over a branch it had moved. It now says `branch main moved <old> -> <pin>, the pin, and git refused to check it out:`. Blank lines in git's message are no longer printed as a line of spaces. - A fresh `git clone --recurse-submodules` makes each leg's branch at its remote's tip and leaves the leg detached at the pin. Where the leg's remote had moved past the pin, bootstrap met a branch ahead of the pin, printed `not moving an existing branch` and left the leg detached: the same harm, on the onboarding flow AGENTS.md section 3 describes. When the branch has NO commit of its own (its tip is its upstream's remote-tracking ref, compared by object id), the pin is an ancestor of it, and HEAD is detached AT the pin, bootstrap now runs `branch -f` then `checkout`. No file changes, a local edit included. It prints one line: `branch main moved back <tip> -> <pin>, the pin; nothing is lost, origin/main still holds those commits, and `git -C spec merge --ff-only origin/main` brings the branch forward`. - Every other branch past the pin keeps today's refusal, byte for byte: a commit of its own, no upstream, an upstream that is a local branch, an upstream whose remote-tracking ref is missing, HEAD on the branch, and a branch that does not contain the pin. A branch another worktree has checked out is refused by git, and its words are printed. Unchanged, diffed with the review's probe (old head vs this commit): the output and the state left for the 16 other scenarios, the fresh clone, the tip at the pin, ahead, diverged and behind among them. The template's digest moves again. templates/family-root/scripts/ bootstrap.py places no leg on a branch (it runs `git submodule update --init --recursive`, then each member's own `make bootstrap`, which is this file), and is unchanged. tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py gains eleven tests: the tracked edit, plain and with `merge.autostash=true` through `GIT_CONFIG_COUNT`; the refused checkout; the move-back's spelling; the fresh clone end to end; a local edit kept; and the refusals for a commit of its own, no upstream, a missing upstream ref, HEAD on the branch and a diverged branch, on a second scaffold whose spec remote's `main` is past the pin. Left out: the stale "never moves an existing branch" docstrings in shape-doctor.py and the tests, which other open pull requests touch. Lane: openreposhape-3 (openRepoShape-3) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
(lane openRepoShape-3, 2026-10-12T23:56Z) @codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b247dec0f9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| why = _git_says(["branch", "-f", branch, pin], sub) | ||
| if why is not None: | ||
| return False, why | ||
| return True, _git_says(["checkout", "-q", branch], sub) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Preserve checkout failures on subsequent bootstrap runs
When branch -f succeeds but checkout continues to fail—for example, with the index.lock condition exercised by the new test—this leaves the branch at the pin while HEAD remains detached. A subsequent bootstrap then enters the existing local == pin path, ignores another failed checkout, and prints on main at ... even though the leg is still detached, so the next commit can be created off-branch. Roll back the branch after a failed checkout, or make the local == pin path verify and report checkout failure.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L101-L104
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(lane openRepoShape-3, 2026-10-13T00:25Z) Fixed in 757a440 by verifying, not rolling back: the branch-at-the-pin path (new place_at_pin) and _move_and_check_out now run the checkout through _git_says and read where HEAD ended up, so a second run with the lock still there prints branch main is at the pin <pin>, and git refused to check it out: with git's lines instead of on main at; this also fixes main's own false line for a branch already at the pin. tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py keeps the index.lock across two runs and adds the branch-at-the-pin case.
…out by where HEAD is afterwards, so a branch at the pin that git will not check out is no longer reported `on main` over a detached leg, a failing post-checkout hook is no longer called a refused checkout, and the move-back's printed command is shell-quoted (#475) Second fix round on #490, for the independent verification and codex's P2 on b247dec. - A branch whose tip IS the pin: bootstrap ran `git checkout <branch>`, ignored the result and printed `on main at <pin>`. With a stale `index.lock` the leg stayed detached; with a local edit in the way it stayed on another branch. That is on main too, and this PR opened a new way in: a branch `branch -f` moved to the pin whose checkout git refused is at the pin on the next run. The new `place_at_pin` runs the checkout through `_git_says`, reads `_head_of` and, unless HEAD is on the branch at the pin, prints `branch main is at the pin <pin>, and git refused to check it out:` with git's lines. The branch is never put back: that is a second ref write a stale lock refuses too. - `_move_and_check_out` decides the same way, through the new `_check_out`. A post-checkout hook's exit status is the checkout's own, so a hook that fails after HEAD moved made the line say git refused a checkout that happened. Now the move's line is printed, and git's words follow it under `checked out, and then git said:`. - The move-back line's `git -C <leg> merge --ff-only <upstream>` quotes the leg path and the upstream with `shlex.quote`, then spells them, as scripts/family.py quotes the commands it prints. An ordinary path prints as before; `my spec` prints as `'my spec'`. The NOT INITIALIZED line is a different line and is unchanged. Unchanged, diffed with the verification's probe (b247dec vs this commit): the output and the state left in 21 of its 30 scenarios. In three more, only the scratch path inside git's message differs. The other six are the changes above: a lock kept over two runs (index.lock, HEAD.lock), a lock with the branch already at the pin, a checkout refused for a local edit, a failing post-checkout hook and a leg path with a space. The template's digest moves again. tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py: the index.lock test keeps the lock for a second run, which must not say `on main at`; a branch at the pin with an index.lock; a failing post-checkout hook, through `core.hooksPath` in the command scope; a leg at `my spec`, whose printed command is split as a shell splits it and run; and a local branch as the upstream, refused. Left out: a move-back after a force-push that dropped the person's pushed commit from the leg's shared branch leaves that commit only in the reflog once the next fetch runs; it needs a force-push on that branch. Lane: openreposhape-3 (openRepoShape-3) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
bump-leg.py then make bootstrap leaves the leg on its branch AT the new pin, no longer detached under not moving an existing branch (#475)bump-leg.py then make bootstrap, and git clone --recurse-submodules then make bootstrap, leave the leg on its branch AT the pin, no longer detached under not moving an existing branch (#475)
|
(lane openRepoShape-3, 2026-10-13T00:26Z) @codex review |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Lane: openreposhape-5 (openRepoShape-5) (lane openRepoShape-5, v1.0.0 accuracy pass, #483; read at AGENTS.md:345 (D1-F9) and README.md:995 (D3-F7): "The leg is left DETACHED at the new commit.
|
|
(lane openRepoShape-3, 2026-10-13T01:47:08Z) Thanks. #490 keeps its scope. Three places still promise more than bootstrap does: the AGENTS.md and README.md sentence (" |
|
… writes its pin file as the scaffold does, so an adopted root passes `validate-pins.py` (#273); a `--pin-source` that cannot answer is `pin-source-unreadable` (#339) (#508) **Brought up to date after #409 squash-landed** by merging origin/main (9736424, #409's squash) as f9ed46f. Its `scaffold-project.py` conflict was resolved to this branch's side once `git diff b70a07d 9736424 -- scaffold-project.py` (#409's final head against its squash) came out empty. So the file is the one tested on this branch plus main's own later changes to it, and holds nothing of #409's; details below. This branch carries #275's adopt half. It was built on `fix/pin-source-env-collisions`, PR #409 (#275's scaffold half and its fix round), merged at 6494714 as 583f647, over the earlier 5690235 (34dbd86). After 6494714, #409 only merged main, five times, up to its final head b70a07d, and none of those merges has a hand edit (`git show --remerge-diff` is empty for each). Adopt's refusal of two products that share a source variable goes through #409's function, so this branch lands after #409. It was never rebased. `git diff b70a07d 9736424` is empty for each file #409 touched: `scaffold-project.py`, `scripts/repo_shape.py`, `templates/assembly-root/scripts/validate-pins.py` and `tests/test_pin_source_env_collisions.py`. What f9ed46f resolves, four files with one hunk each: - **`scaffold-project.py`.** - The conflict hunk is main's block from `PIN_COLLISION_REMEDIATION` through `_pin_collision_remediation`, which #409's squash edits: it adds `PIN_VARIABLE_REMEDIATION`, `_colliding_pin_variables` and `_pin_collision_remediation` and changes `_refuse_colliding_pins`. This branch moved all of that to `scripts/shape_materialize.py`. The hunk takes this branch's side. (The merge commit's message says "re-adds"; this is the exact account.) - #409's auto-merged import of `PIN_SOURCE_ENV_PREFIX, pin_source_env_collisions` is dropped, because nothing in the file uses either name any more. - It is not `git checkout --ours` of the whole file. Main changed the file beyond #409 since this branch last merged it: #355's `--tracking-branch` check (6c2a371) and a73b4e9's `RULESET_HINT`. Those lines stay. - The result is the file `git merge-tree` gives for this branch with main before the squash (518010b). Its diff from the file tested here has the same patch-id as main's own 3ef059c..518010b change to it. - **`templates/assembly-root/scripts/validate-pins.py`.** Main's side, which is #409's final blob, with main's #359 workflow reader in it. This branch had no change of its own to the file beyond #409. - **`adopt-project.py`, `_commit_the_split`.** - Main: #445 wraps the function in its late-failure `try`, and #394 builds an `append` with the plan's submodule record. - This branch: its only edits there were a comment and `neutral_pins=_recorded_pins(plan)` on the materializer call. - Both now sit on main's call inside the `try`: `append=append, neutral_pins=_recorded_pins(plan)`. - **`docs/cli.md`.** It is regenerated with `scripts/render-cli-reference.py`, and `--check` is ok. It differs from main's only in the `--pin`, `--pin-owner` and `--pin-source` help of `adopt-project.py plan`. `scripts/repo_shape.py`, `templates/assembly-root/scripts/validate-pins.py` and `tests/test_pin_source_env_collisions.py` are main's blobs, which are #409's: this branch adds nothing to them. Nothing of #409 is lost. Its scaffold behaviour is `shape_materialize.refuse_colliding_pins` and `pin_variable_collisions`, keyed by #409's `pin_product_key`. **73d65c6, after the merge.** - **The change.** `_read_pins` reads `plan.get("pins")` where it read `plan.data.get("pins")`. - **Why.** #445's `tests/test_adopt_late_failure.py` hands `_commit_the_split` a `SplitPlan` as its plan, a `dict` that adds `entries`. On f9ed46f, three of its tests stopped at "committing the split" with `AttributeError: 'SplitPlan' object has no attribute 'data'` (3 failed, 83 passed in that file). - **Nothing else changes.** `Plan.get` with no default returns `plan.data.get(key)` exactly, so a loaded plan reads as before. `adopt-project.py plan --pin` took a NAME only (`--pin openGlass`) and refused a trailing `@<commit>`. `plan`, `check` and `execute` each exited 0, and `execute` printed `adoption verified`. The manifest then listed the name in `neutral_product_pins:` with no `contracts/<product>-pin.yaml` beside it, and on its first run the adopted root's own `validate-pins.py` refused it as `neutral-pin-missing`. #273's table, reproduced on c7c02fa with the issue's own commands (local bare remotes, and a stub `gh` that exits 97): | `--pin` | c7c02fa | this branch | |---|---|---| | `openGlass` | `execute` exit 0, `- openGlass`; clone's `validate-pins.py` exit 2 `neutral-pin-missing` | `plan` exit 2 `pin-malformed`, with the scaffold's remediation (`--pin openGlass@<40 hex>`); no plan is written | | `opensoft/openGlass` | exit 0, `- opensoft/openGlass`; exit 2 `neutral-pin-missing` for `contracts/opensoft/openglass-pin.yaml` | `plan` exit 2 `pin-malformed` | | `spec` | exit 0; `validate-pins.py` exit 0, reading the leg's `contracts/spec-pin.yaml` as the neutral pin | `spec@<sha>` is `adopt-pin-collides` at `plan` | | `shape` | exit 0; `contracts/shape-pin.yaml` read as the neutral pin | `shape@<sha>` is `adopt-pin-collides` at `plan` | | `openGlass@<sha>`, `opensoft/openGlass@<sha>` | `plan` exit 2 `adopt-pin-malformed` | `plan`, `check` and `execute` exit 0, and `gh` is called 0 times. `contracts/openglass-pin.yaml` is written and the manifest lists `- openGlass`. In the clone, `validate-manifest.py` exits 0, and `validate-pins.py` exits 0 with `openGlass: pin commit … digest recomputes` | Brett ruled for decision 1's first option ("go with your recommendation on #273"): adopt takes the scaffold's pin and writes the scaffold's pin file. That reverses the NAME-only `--pin` from #6, and the comment that described it is replaced with the new contract. - **One implementation.** The scaffold's pin code moved into `scripts/shape_materialize.py`, next to `neutral_pin_path` and the materializer that writes the file. What moved: - `PIN_ARG_RE`, `parse_pin`, `pin_digest_from_source` and `pin_digest_from_gh`; - `declared_pin_values`, `declared_pin_products` and `PIN_COLLISION_REMEDIATION` (in #309's wording); - from #275's branch, `PIN_VARIABLE_REMEDIATION` and the variable check; - `_refuse_colliding_pins`, split into the pure `pin_collisions` and `pin_variable_collisions`, and `refuse_colliding_pins(refusal=...)`, which raises one refusal for both. The code did not move verbatim. `_refuse_colliding_pins` became the three functions above; `pin_digest_from_source` was rewritten for #339 (below); and fix round 1 changed three of them (below): `pin_variable_collisions` keys each pin by #275's `pin_product_key`, `pin_digest_from_source` spells a path that is not printable, and `pin_digest_from_gh` refuses a missing `gh`. The scaffold's behaviour is otherwise unchanged. `scaffold-project.py` imports what it calls under its old names. Lane 5's review ran 34 scaffold cases (every pin refusal, the `gh` stub's four modes, dry and real successes) on 34dbd86 and on this branch at 7a94b6b. rc, stdout, stderr, the `gh` log and the files made were identical, apart from the shape's own commit and digest and #339's row. Its pin tests and #275's pass as they are. `tests/test_git_output_decoding.py`'s exemption for `pin_digest_from_gh` follows the function to its new file. - **`plan`.** `--pin`, `--pin-owner` and `--pin-source` mean what they mean for the scaffold. `plan` reads the digest from `--pin-source` or `gh api`, and records product, repository, commit, digest and `digest_source` in the plan, so `check` and `execute` read no network for a pin. `plan` refuses: - a name with no `@<commit>`, as `pin-malformed`. That includes an empty `--pin ''`, which adopt used to drop and now refuses, as the scaffold always has; - `spec`, `code` and `shape`, in any case, as `adopt-pin-collides` (#273 decision 4), in the scaffold's sentence and remediation (#241, #309); - one product given twice, the same way, whether it is a repeat or two names that share one file (decision 5); - two products that one `SHAPE_PIN_SOURCE_<PRODUCT>` names, such as `open-glass` and `open_glass`, the same way, through #275's check; - a leg path over a pin's file, as `adopt-leg-path-collides`; - a `--pin-source` path that `check` would refuse in `digest_source:` (fix round 1), as `adopt-unwritable-value`. It is asked only when a `--pin` records the path; - with no `gh` on PATH and no `--pin-source`, `gh-not-found` (fix round 1). - **`check` and `execute`.** These are new `check` findings, and `execute` refuses each one before any leg exists. They come from `_leg_findings`, the list `check` and `_refuse_what_check_finds` share: - `plan-pin-unrecorded`: a name alone (an old plan's `pins: [openGlass]`, or a hand edit), or an entry missing its commit or digest; - `plan-pin-malformed`; - `plan-pin-collides`, which covers two pins at one file, a pin at a file the shape writes, and two products that share one source variable; - `plan-root-holds-pin`: a source path kept in the root at the pin's file. The materializer would write the shape's pin beside it under `shape/`, and `validate-pins.py` would read the source's file instead. How each finding ends: - `plan-pin-unrecorded` and `plan-pin-malformed` end with the `plan --pin <product>@<40 hex commit>` that records the pin whole. - `plan-pin-collides` ends with re-running `plan` with each product once, or, for two products that share a source variable, with one product of each such group. - `plan-root-holds-pin` ends with the kept path's own remedy: send that entry to a leg, `drop` it, or rename it in the source and re-run `plan`. A leg moved over a pin's file in the plan is `plan-leg-path-collides`. - **Also part of #386: its `pins:` row.** A hand-edited `pins:` that is not a list (a name such as `pins: openGlass`, a number, a mapping, a quoted string) is now `plan-pin-malformed` in `check` (`` `pins:` is 'openGlass', not a list of pins ``), and `execute` refuses it before any leg exists. - Where: `_read_pins` in `adopt-project.py`; the test row is `plan-pin-malformed-not-a-list` in `tests/test_adopt_pins.py`. - Before: on main, `check` said `plan ok` for the name, the mapping and the string, and gave a traceback for the number (reproduced by lane 5's review on cb7063f). #386 records that `execute` then wrote the name as eight one-letter pins. - Not fixed here: #386's other keys, `allow_empty_legs:`, `paths:`, `legs:` and `source:`, so #386 stays open. Lane 2's #435 takes all of #386, `pins:` included, and its `pins:` rule keeps only text items where this branch writes mappings; whichever lands second reconciles them (#435 (comment), and "Where the meaning meets" below). - **`execute`.** It writes each pin through `materialize_assembly_root(neutral_pins=...)`. The manifest lists the product with the owner stripped (decision 3), so the entry and the file agree. - **Docs.** `--help` is updated and `docs/cli.md` regenerated (`render-cli-reference.py --check` ok). `pin_digest_from_source` caught only `Refusal`. A directory that is no clone is git's own failure, so it was always `pin-source-unreadable`, exit 2. A path `subprocess.run` cannot enter never reaches git: it is a `FileNotFoundError`, `NotADirectoryError` or `PermissionError` out of `cwd=`, and nothing caught it. `scaffold-project.py --pin ... --pin-source <that>` ended `--dry-run` and the real run alike in a traceback, exit 1. Since the move above, `adopt-project.py plan --pin` reads its digest through the same function and ended the same way. Both reach it through `declared_pin_values`, and `check` and `execute` read no source, so that call is the only reader. The issue's table, run on ab623dd for the scaffold and on d806e8f for `adopt-project.py plan` (adopt has no `--pin-source` on ab623dd), then on this head. `gh` is a stub that logs and exits 97, with `GH_TOKEN` bogus and an empty `GH_CONFIG_DIR`; it was called 0 times in every run: | `--pin-source` | before | this branch | |---|---|---| | a directory that is not a clone | `pin-source-unreadable`, exit 2 | unchanged | | a path that does not exist | `FileNotFoundError` traceback, exit 1 | `pin-source-unreadable`, exit 2: `<path> could not answer for opensoft/openGlass @ <40 hex>: no such directory` | | a file | `NotADirectoryError`, exit 1 | exit 2, `... it is a file, not a directory` | | under a parent this user cannot enter | `PermissionError`, exit 1 | exit 2, `... Permission denied` | | a symlink loop (not in the issue) | `RuntimeError` out of `Path.resolve()` on 3.12, exit 1 | exit 2, `... Too many levels of symbolic links` | The real run and `--dry-run` give the same stdout and stderr, and nothing exists afterwards (no remote directory, no work directory; for adopt, no plan file). What changed, in `scripts/shape_materialize.py` only: - `pin_digest_from_source` catches `OSError` as well as `Refusal` and raises the existing `pin-source-unreadable` with its remediation unchanged. The message names the path and the reason. - `stat()` judges the source inside the guard, as #312 does in `validate-pins.py`, and the sentences are that file's: a missing path, or one beneath a file, is "no such directory"; a file is "it is a file, not a directory"; any other `OSError`, from `stat()` or from git's `cwd=`, is the system's own reason (`strerror`). It is not `exists()`/`is_dir()`, which before 3.14 swallow only a missing path. A source `stat()` can read but `cwd=` cannot enter, a directory with no search bit, fails in `tree_digest` and the same guard answers it. - `declared_pin_values` resolves the path through a guarded `_resolved_pin_source`. `Path.resolve()` raises a `RuntimeError` on a symlink loop before 3.13 (an `OSError` since), before the digest was asked for. As typed, `stat()` meets the loop and says so. - A source that answers is read exactly as before: a relative path resolves against the working directory, a symlink to a clone is followed, `digest_source` reads `local-clone (<path as typed>)`, and the digest is `tree_digest`'s. `tests/test_pin_source_unreadable.py` (46 tests in the #339 commit; fix round 1 adds 17 for S1 and moves one, below) runs each case through `scaffold-project.py --dry-run`, its real run and `adopt-project.py plan`: missing, a file, beneath a file, relative and missing, a parent and a source with no search bit (skipped on Windows and as root, by a mark, so before any fixture builds a directory), a 300-character name, a symlink loop (skipped on Windows) and a directory that is no clone. Each asserts exit 2, the refusal naming the path and the reason, its remediation, no traceback and nothing created. It also holds `--dry-run` and the real run to the same stdout and stderr, checks the path is printed escaped under an ASCII stderr and as a surrogate when it is not UTF-8, and checks that a relative source and a symlink to a clone read as before. The session `gh` guard fails any test whose run called `gh`. origin/main ab623dd reached this branch through implQ's branch: 34dbd86 is a30091f merged with ab623dd. One file conflicted there, `templates/assembly-root/scripts/validate-pins.py`, in seven hunks, because #312 (8cdca5e) replaced `keyed_sources` and `default_source` with `PinSources` and #275 added `env_shared` and `shared`. #312's blob is the same at its PR head, at the squash and at ab623dd, so it landed the file implQ resolved against. The resolution keeps #312's side in all seven and adds #275's on top: | # | hunk | resolution | |---|---|---| | 1 | `resolve_neutral_pin_source` signature | #312's `sources: PinSources` and 3-tuple return, plus #275's `env_shared: bool = False` | | 2 | its docstring tail | #312's `Returns (path, how, typed)` text, plus #275's "Rule 2 is skipped when `env_shared`" paragraph | | 3 | `_recompute_neutral_pin_digest` signature | #312's `sources`, plus #275's `shared: frozenset[str]` after `report` | | 4 | the `resolve_neutral_pin_source(...)` call inside it | #312's 3-tuple unpack, plus `env_shared = product.casefold() in shared` and the extra argument | | 5 | `_check_one_neutral_product_pin` signature | #312's `sources`, plus #275's `shared` | | 6 | its call of `_recompute_neutral_pin_digest` | `sources, report, shared` | | 7 | `_check_neutral_product_pins` docstring and body | #312's `PinSources(...)` and `_note_unused_pin_sources`, plus #275's paragraph, `_report_pin_source_collisions(products, report)` and `shared = frozenset(pin_source_env_shared(products))` | This branch's own merge of 34dbd86 (5690235) had no conflict, and neither had its merge of #409's fix round, 6494714 (583f647). That fix round made `neutral-pin-source-collides` a note and keyed "one product" by `repo_shape.pin_product_key`. At 421e4e5, `templates/assembly-root/scripts/validate-pins.py`, `scripts/repo_shape.py` and `tests/test_pin_source_env_collisions.py` were byte-identical to the tree `git merge-tree` gives for 6494714 with origin/main 3ef059c (blobs 5604007, 091966b, 5220787), so this branch added nothing to those three files beyond #409. The 34dbd86 merge brought in #335, #312, #317, #270 (f795cf7), #344 and #349 with no conflict. Earlier merges of origin/main (87373a6, for #309's reworded constant, and e43fa95) are unchanged. Fix round 1 merged origin/main three more times: - **cd1fc79 (2bcfa69).** It brought #245, #351, #350, #345, #372, #371, #354, #380, #377 and the rest since ab623dd, with no conflict. - **45e01f4 (4098b61).** It brought #396's `tests/test_agents_md_codes.py`. That test finds `scaffold-pin-collides` as a string constant of `scripts/shape_materialize.py`, which `SHIPPED` lists. - **3ef059c (421e4e5), #314.** One conflict, one hunk in `adopt-project.py`. This branch's `_refuse_an_unrecordable_pin_source` and #314's section "The project must be able to hold what `execute` writes into it (#261)" were added at the same place; both are kept. Where the two meet, lane 5's earlier recipe applies: - `_flag_plan` builds each pin as the `PIN_FIELDS` mapping `plan` writes, not `list(pins)` of products. So the plan `plan` asks the validator about is the plan it writes. - #314's `test_plan_asks_what_check_asks_of_the_same_keys` plans `--pin openGlass@<commit> --pin-source <stand-in>` where it planned the name alone, which `plan` now refuses. Then f9ed46f, after #409 squash-landed, and 73d65c6 after it (top of this description). On the merged tree exactly one test failed: `tests/test_adopt_template_values.py::test_check_finds_and_execute_refuses_a_hand_edited_value[pins-surrogate]`. It plans, then hand-edits the plan to `pins: ["openX\ud800"]`, a name-only pin with a lone surrogate. Before this branch the refusal's headline was `REFUSED plan-unwritable-value`. A name-only pin in a plan is now `plan-pin-unrecorded` (#273), so `check` has a second, independent finding for that very plan, and the headline is the first finding's: ``` REFUSED plan-pin-unrecorded: 2 finding(s) ... FINDING plan-pin-unrecorded: `pins:` entry 1, 'openX\ud800', is a name with no commit and no digest ... FINDING plan-unwritable-value: a `pins:` item is 'openX\ud800', which `execute` writes into the assembly root's `project.yaml`, and it holds a lone surrogate ... ``` Nothing about #270's contract changed. The lone surrogate is still found as `plan-unwritable-value`, listed under the refusal, and `execute` still refuses before any leg exists. `check` builds `_leg_findings`, where `_pin_findings` sits, before it calls `_value_findings`, so the pin finding comes first. d806e8f changes one assertion for that row, `pins` only: the headline is `REFUSED plan-pin-unrecorded: ` where it was `PLAN_REFUSED`. The other 15 rows and the finding assertions, including the `plan-unwritable-value` line, are untouched. Lane 5's review of 7a94b6b found 3 should-fix and 5 nits. Each is answered here: - **#409's `pin_product_key` (review N1).** The merge of #409's fix round could not carry it, because this branch had moved the function that used it out of `scaffold-project.py`. `pin_variable_collisions` now keys each pin by that function, where it casefolded. `openß` and `openss` are two pin files and one `SHAPE_PIN_SOURCE_OPENSS`, and a casefold named each of the two pins twice. No `--pin` or recorded `pins:` entry `PIN_ARG_RE` admits can spell either, so the test asks the function directly. `refuse_colliding_pins`' docstring now says, in #409's words, that the root's `validate-pins.py` only notes such a pair. - **S1, a `--pin-source` path that is not printable.** `pin_digest_from_source` names the path as typed unless it is not printable (`str.isprintable`), and then as Python's `repr` spells it (`shown_source`). That covers the refusal's head and git's own reason, which names the directory it ran in. Printed raw, an ESC reached the terminal, and a line break or a carriage return began a line of the path's choosing, a forged `REFUSED` line among them, from the scaffold and from adopt. The traceback #339 replaced had shown a `repr`. A printable path is named byte for byte as before. - **S2, no `gh` on PATH.** `pin_digest_from_gh` refuses as `gh-not-found`, exit 2, as `repo_shape.tree_digest_from_gh` names it, and offers `--pin-source`. It was a `FileNotFoundError` traceback, exit 1, from the scaffold and, new with this branch, from `adopt-project.py plan --pin`. - **S3, a hand-edited `commit:` or `tree_sha256:`.** The lane's decision is to accept it and document it (option (c)); no behaviour changed. A pair that disagrees passes `check` and `execute` (`adoption verified`), because neither reads a network for a pin, by design. The adopted root's own `validate-pins.py` then exits 1 with `neutral-pin-digest-mismatch` wherever it can read the product. `check` now says so once, after the pins it will write: "each pin as `plan` read it, not read again here: the root's own `validate-pins.py` recomputes its digest wherever it can read the product". Options (a), `execute` recomputes before it creates the legs, and (b), `check` recomputes from a clone still on the machine, are filed as #449. - **N2, a `--pin-source` that `plan` cannot record.** `plan` asks `check`'s question (`one_printable_line`) of the path it records in each pin's `digest_source:`, before any digest is read. It refuses one that fails as `adopt-unwritable-value`, in #270's words (`unwritable_reason`), or as "an invisible formatting character" where those name nothing. Before, it was planned, exit 0, and printed raw in the report. `check` then refused it as `plan-pin-malformed` and said to re-run the same `plan`. The report's `pin` line and `check`'s `write` line now spell the digest's source with `_shown`. The scaffold half is pre-existing (a line break in the path is written into the pin file; a byte that is not UTF-8 dies after all three repositories exist) and is filed as #450. - **N3, six hunks no test guarded.** Each now has a test that fails when it alone is reverted: - the two name guards (a `pins:` name holding an ESC and a forged line); - the lower-casing of the commit and the digest (an upper-cased hand edit); - the `digest_source` printability check; - the not-text check (`commit: 1234567` unquoted); - the gitlink filter (a submodule kept where the pin is written is `plan-submodule-root` alone). - **N4.** This body. - **N5, #339's third decision.** A `--pin-source` that nothing reads is still silent, now in adopt too. This PR does not decide it. #451, filed, lays out refuse, note and leave, so closing #339 loses nothing. Lane 5's second review, of 421e4e5, found no blocking item, 2 should-fix items and 3 nits. The two should-fix items are this body: the landing after #409 (above) and #386 (above). The code needed no change for them. f63d1ed adds two tests and no code: - **n1. `plan` asks nothing of a `--pin-source` no `--pin` records.** With the `args.pin and` guard dropped, such a path holding an ESC or a zero-width joiner was refused in a sentence naming no file ("`execute` writes into , and ..."), and every test still passed. `test_a_pin_source_no_pin_records_is_not_asked_about` holds the plan to exit 0 and `pins: []`, with the path named nowhere in the plan or the report. The ESC row is POSIX-only by the file's `POSIX_NAMES` mark; the zero-width joiner row runs everywhere. It holds #451's answer today, silence, so a decision there changes this test on purpose. - **n2. A printable `--pin-source` is printed as it is.** With `_spelled` in place of `_shown` in `plan`'s `pin` line, every test still passed. `test_a_printable_pin_source_is_printed_as_it_is` holds `plan`'s `pin` line, and `check`'s `write` line for the plan `plan` wrote, to their exact text, ending `(local-clone (<path>))` with no backtick. - **n3** needs a code change and is left out (below). **Fix round 2, on f63d1ed.** Each run had a `gh` stub first on PATH (it logs and exits 97), `GH_TOKEN` bogus, an empty `GH_CONFIG_DIR`, `git-filter-repo` 2.47.0 next on PATH, and the identity blanked with `GIT_CONFIG_COUNT`; the session `gh` guard came first inside each run. - **The pin set: 812 passed, 2 skipped.** It covers adopt pins, adopt plan, #339's file, #275's tests, the pin and neutral-pin validators, git output decoding, adopt template values, CLI reference, scaffold pin and reuse, scaffold pin collisions, #314's two files and #396's file. The skips are `test_adopt_plan.py:403` (no MedxEHR clone) and `test_adopt_template_values.py:223` (this host reads `git config user.name` from the repository, not from `GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL`). That is fix round 1's 809 passed, plus the three new rows. - **Shape doctor and scaffold leg-path collisions: 369 passed, 3 skipped** (the PowerShell line exists only on a Windows host). - **Mutation probes**, each one line changed in a throwaway worktree, over `tests/test_adopt_pins.py` and `tests/test_pin_source_unreadable.py` less the five end-to-end adoptions: - the `args.pin and` guard dropped: 2 failed, both n1 rows; - `plan`'s `pin` line `_spelled`: 1 failed, the n2 test; - `check`'s `write` line `_spelled`: 2 failed, the n2 test and `test_an_upper_cased_hand_edit_is_written_lower_cased`; - `plan`'s `pin` line raw: 1 failed, the no-break-space test that already guarded that hunk. **On the merged tree, 73d65c6** (the merge f9ed46f and the `_read_pins` commit), with the same harness: - **The pin set** above, with #445's `test_adopt_late_failure.py`, `test_adopt_git_reads.py` and `test_adopt_filter_repo_failure.py` and #387's `test_adopt_empty_symlinks.py` and `test_adopt_root_manifest.py`: **988 passed, 2 skipped**. The skips are the two above. - **Shape doctor, scaffold leg-path collisions and the adopt suites:** **967 passed, 3 skipped** (the PowerShell line). The adopt suites are e2e, execute refusals, verify, root shape paths (#387's too), leg-path collisions, clone template, ignored shape files and submodules. - **On the merge alone, f9ed46f** (the same tree as before the `_read_pins` commit): `tests/test_adopt_late_failure.py` gave 3 failed, 83 passed, the three `AttributeError` rows above. - `render-cli-reference.py --check` is ok on the merged tree. pyflakes reports the same four warnings on `adopt-project.py`, `scaffold-project.py` and `scripts/shape_materialize.py` as before the merge. **Fix round 1, on 421e4e5.** Each run had `git-filter-repo` 2.47.0 on PATH and the identity blanked with `GIT_CONFIG_COUNT`. A `gh` stub that logs and exits 97 was first on PATH, with `GH_TOKEN` bogus and an empty `GH_CONFIG_DIR`, and the session `gh` guard came first inside each run. - **The pin set:** 809 passed, 2 skipped (the same files and skips as above). - **Doctor and scaffold:** 782 passed, 3 skipped (the PowerShell line exists only on a Windows host). It covers shape doctor, scaffold leg-path collisions, scaffold e2e, referent chain links, naming policy, repo hygiene and #351's free-text values. - **The adopt suites:** 882 passed. It covers e2e, execute refusals, verify, spec-only, leg paths, root shape paths, plan escapes, leg-path collisions, clone template and submodules. - **Before the #314 merge,** on 74ce4d9's tree: the first two sets gave 577 passed, 2 skipped and 782 passed, 3 skipped. On 2bcfa69's tree (the merges alone, before the fix) they gave 542 passed, 2 skipped and 782 passed, 3 skipped. After the 45e01f4 merge, `tests/test_agents_md_codes.py`, repo hygiene and CLI reference: 110 passed. - **Lane 5's second review** also ran 421e4e5 merged with main cb7063f and with 53bee5b: the pin set, the manifest-value set, and the doctor set with #357's `tests/test_doctor_validator_rows.py`. All passed, with only the skips above. Proof that fix round 1's tests test something: - **On 2bcfa69's tree,** with this head's two test files laid over it, 31 of the new rows fail: - S1: 17; - N2 and its report spelling: 7; - S2: 3; - the `pin_product_key` port: 2; - `check`'s S3 line: 1; - the not-UTF-8 `adopt plan` row: 1. The N3 rows pass there, as they must: they guard hunks this branch already had. - **Mutation probes.** Each hunk was reverted alone, in a throwaway worktree, and both test files were run: 18 of 18 were caught. - **The port:** the casefold keying (2 fail); the casefold lookup alone (2). - **S1:** the path named raw (13); git's reason named raw (2); every path `repr`'d, printable or not (27). - **S2:** no `except` (3). - **N2:** no `plan` check (11); only #270's question asked (1); the formatting-character reason said otherwise (1); the report's `pin` line raw (1); `check`'s `write` line raw (1). - **S3:** the line dropped (1). - **N3:** the `_pin_fix` name guard (1); the `_read_pins` path guard (1); the lower-casing (1); the `digest_source` check (1); the not-text check (1); the gitlink filter (1). - **The issue rows reproduced.** S1, S2 and N2 were reproduced on 2bcfa69's tree and shown gone on the fix (a probe driving both tools; `gh` was called 0 times). **Before fix round 1.** Runs were on 7a94b6b, with `git-filter-repo` 2.47.0 first on PATH and the repository-local `user.name` blanked with `GIT_CONFIG_COUNT` (a workstation whose standard checkout sets one fails `test_the_scaffold_refuses_with_no_elector` on main itself; CI sets none). 7a94b6b differs from ffd1297 in `tests/test_pin_source_unreadable.py` only, so the three suites that do not read that file ran on ffd1297: - the new file: 46 passed; - adopt pins, adopt plan, git output decoding: 172 passed, 1 skipped (the MedxEHR clone is absent); - scaffold pin and reuse, pin collisions, e2e, referent chain links, neutral pin and pin validators, #275's tests, naming policy, repo hygiene, CLI reference, scaffold leg-path collisions: 571 passed; - shape doctor: 254 passed, 3 skipped (the PowerShell line exists only on a Windows host); - the new file with repo hygiene, git output decoding and CLI reference, once more after the last edit: 176 passed. Earlier on 5690235 and d806e8f, before the #339 commit: the adopt suites (e2e, execute refusals, verify, spec-only, leg paths, root shape paths, plan escapes, leg-path collisions, clone template) 740 passed, and `tests/test_adopt_template_values.py` with #273's other adopt tests 489 passed, 2 skipped. They were not re-run on 7a94b6b: the #339 diff touches `pin_digest_from_source` and the call in `declared_pin_values`, which those suites reach through `test_adopt_pins.py` only. Nothing was run on macOS or Windows. Proof the new tests test something: - **On d806e8f.** 38 of the 46 fail, each on the traceback and its exit 1. The 8 that pass are the unchanged behaviour: the not-a-clone refusal (4 rows) and the valid-source rows (4). - **Mutation probes.** Ten hunks reverted one at a time, each failing at least one new test: the `OSError` catch (16 fail), the catch narrowed to `OSError` only (21), the missing-path clause (9), the clause narrowed to `FileNotFoundError` (3), the `S_ISDIR` judgement (3), the loop guard (4), no resolve at all (3), the old `.resolve()` call (4), the reason as `str(exc)` (12), and the file sentence as the OS's (3). - #273's own 52 tests still fail on c7c02fa (51 fail or error; the one that passes checks the test's own table), and its 18 mutation probes were each caught. **Re-verified after the merge.** An independent re-verification of f9ed46f and 73d65c6 found the code correct: - #409 is carried whole. A 30,000-case fuzz of `--pin` lists through #409's final refusal and this branch's port differed in 0 cases. - `scaffold-project.py` equals the tested file plus main's own changes that are not #409's (same patch-id). - `_commit_the_split` keeps #445's `try` and #394's `append`. - `_read_pins` reads a loaded plan as before. Its findings were all in this description (the #506 bullet and three stale facts), now fixed. Runs on the head and on its merge with main 48585e6: 988 passed, 2 skipped; and 967 passed, 3 skipped. `git merge-tree --write-tree` was run at 01:48Z on 2026-10-13, comparing hunks per file. Each PR head, fetched from `refs/pull/<n>/head` with no `gh`, was merged with 73d65c6 and with origin/main 9736424 alone. Two sets were asked about: - every PR this description listed before that main does not now contain; - every PR numbered above #468 whose head main does not contain: #473, #474, #490, #491, #493, #494, #495, #496, #497, #503, #504 and #505. **Open state, read with `gh` by the coordinator at 02:00Z and refreshed at 02:25Z after a re-verification on main 48585e6.** Every pull request named below is open. #184, #94, #96, #98, #100 and #161 are closed, and #465 landed as 48585e6. `fix/adopt-plan-quote-yaml-keywords` has no pull request. #506 (`fix/scaffold-reuse-seeded-legs`) opened after this list was made, and the re-verification reads it. - **Landed since the last draft of this list:** #343, #346, #355, #358, #373, #378, #382, #387, #394, #397, #401, #404, #409, #419, #452, #456, #465, #466 and #484. #394's `_commit_the_split` conflict and #401's `docs/cli.md` conflict are both resolved in f9ed46f, above. - **Clean, 20:** #266, #347, #356, #374, #376, #384, #395, #453, #467, #468, #473, #474, #490, #491, #493, #494, #495, #497, #503 and #505. #453, #468 and #491 were updated onto main since the first read and now merge clean. #507 (lane 5's #486-#488) shares only the generated `docs/cli.md` with this branch and merges clean with it. - **Conflicting with main alone, and this branch adds no hunk:** - #402: `shape-doctor.py` 5; - #496: `shape-doctor.py` 10 and `tests/test_shape_doctor.py` 1. **Conflicts this branch adds:** - **#435** (3efcc7a, lane 2's `fix/adopt-plan-field-types`, for #386). - It adds 2 hunks in `adopt-project.py`: 5 here, against 3 with main alone. They are `render_plan`'s `pins:` line and `Plan.pins`. - Keep this branch's `_pin_lines` and `_pin_products`. The rest is under "Where the meaning meets". - **#504** (37ef29a, `fix/adopt-root-kept-symlinks`). - It adds 1 hunk in `adopt-project.py`: 2 here, against 1 with main alone. It is the materializer call in `_commit_the_split`. - Keep both arguments and both comments: `append=append, neutral_pins=_recorded_pins(plan), spell=_spelled`. - **#506** (119d8c4, `fix/scaffold-reuse-seeded-legs`). - It adds 1 hunk in `scaffold-project.py`. With main alone, #506 conflicts only in `docs/handbook.html`. - #506 inserts `LEG_TEMPLATES` right after `declared_pin_products`, which this branch moved out, and rewrites `_reusable_remotes` further down. Keeping both sides breaks the file with an unterminated string literal. - Keep only #506's `LEG_TEMPLATES` block. Drop #506's `declared_pin_values`/`declared_pin_products`, which moved here, and this branch's three-line `_reusable_remotes` opener, which #506 rewrites below. Resolved that way, pyflakes is clean and #506's scaffold tests pass (88). - **`fix/adopt-plan-quote-yaml-keywords`** (ed9968f; a branch with no pull request). - It adds 2 hunks in `adopt-project.py`: 3 here, against 1 with main alone. - One is `render_plan`'s `pins:` line. Keep `_pin_lines`, which already sends product, repository and `digest_source` through `y`. - The other is `_refuse_unholdable_values`' signature. Keep `pins: dict`, with that branch's `_validator_judged` and `_named_as_read` above it. - `fix/adopt-late-failure-notice` is no longer on origin. #445, the late-failure notice, is on main and merged here. **Where the meaning meets:** - **#435 and #386.** The coordinator has said this on #435: #435 (comment) - #435's `_plan_key_findings` (`plan-bad-pins`) keeps only text items in `pins:`, and its `PINS_REMEDIATION` tells a person to write `pins: [openGlass]`. - This branch writes each pin as a mapping, and it makes a name alone `plan-pin-unrecorded`. - Read from #435's code, not run: on a tree with both, the plan `plan --pin` writes is `plan-bad-pins` in `check`. - Whichever lands second reconciles them, with three changes: - `_plan_key_findings` takes this branch's mappings, or leaves `pins:` items to `_read_pins`; - a `pins:` that is not a list gives one finding, not both `plan-bad-pins` and `plan-pin-malformed`; - `PINS_REMEDIATION` says the mapping `plan` writes. - Until that is done, `tests/test_adopt_pins.py::test_a_plan_with_a_whole_pin_checks_ok` fails. - **#314.** It landed, and it is merged here (above). - **`fix/adopt-plan-quote-yaml-keywords`.** Its pin tests are written against the name-only `--pin`. They need the `name@commit` form, and their expected `pins: [...]` line becomes `_pin_lines`'s mapping. - **Two unwritable values are refused in two runs (lane 5's second review, n3).** `plan --elected-by 'A<LF>B' --pin openGlass@<sha> --pin-source <a path holding an ESC>` refuses the elector alone, exit 2. Re-run with the elector retyped, it refuses the source; #270's refusal names every unwritable value at once. Reproduced on 421e4e5, with `gh` called 0 times. One refusal would need a code change, not made here: - `_refuse_an_unrecordable_pin_source` would split into a function that returns the sentence; - `_checked_plan_inputs` would ask it before #270's `unwritable_values` raise, and raise one `adopt-unwritable-value` that names both, with both remediations; - a test would add the two-value row. N2's question is `one_printable_line`, not `unwritable_reason`, so it cannot simply join #270's list. - **Docs.** The README, AGENTS.md and `docs/handbook.html` are unchanged, because none of them calls adopt's `--pin` a name. A sentence saying adopt now takes the scaffold's `--pin` is a follow-up. It costs an AGENTS.md line-cap raise, and a README edit forces the handbook's README blob to change. - **A product spelled `null`, `true` or `false`.** The scaffold already accepts `--pin null@<sha>`: it exits 0 and builds a root whose `validate-pins.py` exits 1 `neutral-pin-entry-malformed`. Adopt's `plan` writes `product: null` through `y`, and `check` then finds `plan-pin-malformed` and refuses it before any leg exists. The one fix for both tools is in `parse_pin`, and it would change the scaffold's behaviour. - **Wording shared with the scaffold.** `digest_source` is written bare into the pin file, so a `--pin-source` path holding ` #` is cut short there. `templates/assembly-root/contracts/neutral-product-pin.yaml` and `validate-pins.py`'s `neutral-pin-missing` remediation name only the scaffold as the writer. Two comments in `scripts/repo_shape.py` still name the scaffold's `pin_digest_from_gh`, in a digest-pinned shipped copy. - **Filed as follow-ups:** - #449: S3, a hand-edited `commit:` or `tree_sha256:` that disagrees, with options (a) and (b); - #450: the scaffold half of N2, a `--pin-source` path no file can hold; - #451: #339's third decision (N5), a `--pin-source` that nothing reads. - **`validate-pins.py` prints a `--pin-source` path raw** in `neutral-pin-source-unreadable`, the twin of S1. It is a shipped template that #409 and other open PRs edit, so it is left for its own change. No issue is filed for it yet. - **Windows and macOS** were not run here; CI ran both (below). Two assertions that depend on what Windows answers for a path (a name past the filesystem's limit, a path beneath a file) check only the refusal and its remediation there. Fix round 1's rows that need a control character or a byte that is not UTF-8 in a path, or a symlink to `git`, are skipped on Windows by a mark, and so is fix round 2's ESC row. The rows for a no-break space and a zero-width joiner run everywhere, and so does the in-process `gh-not-found` test. Reviewed independently by lane 5 at 7a94b6b (3 should-fix, 5 nits: fix round 1) and at 421e4e5 (0 blockers, 2 should-fix, 3 nits: fix round 2). After #409's squash, the re-verification of f9ed46f and 73d65c6 found the code correct; its 1 should-fix and 3 nits were in this description and are fixed. GitHub's update-branch then merged main twice (33bae3f, 2170526), with no hand edit. CI's tests, tests-macos and tests-windows and SonarCloud all passed at 2170526 (main cac6bb2 merged in). On that head merged with main 57c85e9 (#490, #474 and #468, none of which touches this branch's files), the pin and adopt set with `tests/test_update_shape_landing.py` gave 1112 passed, 2 skipped, and the doctor, adopt end-to-end, unfinished-merge and bootstrap set gave 1056 passed, 3 skipped (the doctor's PowerShell line, which exists only on a Windows host). Closes #273 Closes #339 Lane: openreposhape-5 (openRepoShape-5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…th a bumped leg (#483) D1-F9: AGENTS.md:356 "re-places it on its tracking branch AT the new pin" becomes "puts it on its tracking branch AT the new pin, or says why not; relay which": since #490, templates/assembly-root/scripts/bootstrap.py:393-448 moves a branch at, behind, or (with no commit of its own) ahead of the pin, and leaves any other branch where it is with `not moving an existing branch`. D3-F7: README.md:994 and its docs/handbook.html copy (1368) end the same sentence "AT the new pin, or says why not." docs/handbook.html: README.md blob recomputed. Lane: openreposhape-5 (openRepoShape-5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… false are corrected to what the tools do on main (#483) (#505) **Closes #483.** #483 is the v1.0.0 "README and AGENTS.md accurate" criterion. Three read-only audits (AGENTS.md; README.md lines 1-727; README.md lines 711-end) checked every statement that names a command, a flag, an exit code, a refusal, a file or a step against the code at `ec4a7a0e` and ran the tools offline (local bare remotes, a stub `gh`, a blank git identity). They found 38 false or incomplete statements. This pull request corrects 28 of them (27 whole, and D2-F1 in part), plus two the independent review found (the `MISPLACED` text after #394, and `openRepoShape --preflight` "offers to install" git-filter-repo): 29 rows in all, D1-F9 and D3-F7 sharing one. The other ten, and the rest of D2-F1, were settled by pull requests that landed while this one was open: #484 and #465 settle six (D1-F8, D2-F7, D3-F6; D2-F13, D2-F14, D3-F8), and #491 and #468, to which this branch had routed them, settle four (D1-F1, D2-F5, D1-F2; D3-F11) and the rest of D2-F1. The two routed to #490 (D1-F9, D3-F7) were still false once it landed, and are corrected here. A last read of every line main has added to README.md and AGENTS.md since `ec4a7a0e` found nothing else false, so nothing is left open under #483. Two independent reviews, six rounds. The first head (`bfbd4eeb`) came back CHANGES NEEDED: two corrections that were themselves untrue (exit 3; "each of those tools has its own section") and nine gaps. The second (`ccf520bd`, on a merge of `7a8b981d`, where #394 landed) fixed them and came back with no blocker and three landing changes, which the third commit (`f35e59fa`, on a merge of `5a253877`, where #484 landed) makes: D2-F5 and D1-F1's block go back to #491 (at `2d59d141` its `setup-project.py` reads the yes from the controlling terminal, so the piped one-liner asks once it lands, and its new test strips `<...>` from README.md, which a `bash <(` line breaks); D3-F5 is fixed here now that #484 has landed; and the routes are re-derived at the current heads. The same commit leaves AGENTS.md's family steps 3 and 5 as main has them, so #486-#488 (`10c93ded`) still merges clean. The fourth round merges `48585e62`, where #465 landed (README.md at 699-709, 1028 and 1095 and the handbook beside them, none of which this branch edits), and re-reads the three #465 rows on main. The fifth merges `57c85e92`, where #468 landed (the doctor's `merge` row), as `fb6a9ab4`: the doctor's verdict table, in README.md and in the handbook, takes this branch's `COMPLIANT`, `SHAPE BEHIND` and `DRIFTED` rows and main's `MISPLACED` and `INVALID` rows, and the handbook footer keeps both clauses (#424, then #483) with its blob recomputed. `aa4e1f59` (#508) then merged clean, as `83cfad54`. The sixth merges `70d0d1b3`, where #491 landed (setup asks at the person's own terminal), as `94793aeb`: README.md's "What Dana sees" paragraph takes #491's text whole with this branch's D2-F6 ("a hyphenated name"), and the handbook footer keeps #476's and #492's clauses ahead of #483's, with its blob recomputed. The same round re-reads every routed row on main, corrects D1-F9 and D3-F7 (`ea634043`), and reads what main changed in both files since `ec4a7a0e`. The first reviewer's round four came back APPROVE WITH NITS (0/0/3) and asked for one word, made at `9ac90d16`: "a hyphenated project name", since the leg names are hyphenated and pass. **What.** `README.md` and `AGENTS.md` only, plus `docs/handbook.html` where it repeats a corrected sentence, with its footer's `README.md blob` recomputed (`git hash-object README.md` = `1417b9ec0235675da8f73ca023756411bc3fbe8a`). No tool, test, template or `docs/cli.md` changes. `README.md` hashes identically at `ec4a7a0e`, `437a360a`, `d222a124` and `7a8b981d`, so its audit line numbers held; `AGENTS.md` changed only by #394 (it adds 5 lines after line 154 and 3 more after the doctor's item 4); #484, #465 and #491 since edited both files, and #468 README.md, without changing either total. Each fix is the smallest true sentence, keeps the surrounding voice, and states only what the code or a run showed. **The line caps.** `tests/test_repo_hygiene.py` holds `AGENTS.md` to 490 lines (#394 raised it from 482) and `README.md` to 1422, and both files stand exactly at their caps, so every correction is line-neutral. To give back the lines the longer sentences need, paragraphs that no correction touches are re-wrapped to 80 columns with no word changed: - README.md, eight paragraphs no correction touches: macOS (`and refuses anything below 3.9`), `2. Login.`, the InkRouter ruling quote, `Each leg is pinned TWICE`, the neutral-product election paragraph (`Ruled by Brett Heap on 2026-09-05`), `Its entries are adopt-project.py plan's entries`, `This repository implements neither`, `A FAMILY holder carries both verbs too`; and the tail of the `--link-source` paragraph that D2-F12 edits. None is in README.md's family section (903-925 on main), which #486-#488 edits. - AGENTS.md, four paragraphs no correction touches: the opening paragraph, the NO-code seeding paragraph, doctor item 1 and the park overlay item; and the first half of the doctor intro, whose second half D1-F7 edits. The family steps are main's exact bytes: an earlier head re-wrapped steps 3 and 5 (`make siblings`) and #486-#488 edits both. - Three sentences this pass corrects give up a few words to keep a line: D2-F1's "offers to run" (no "for you"), D2-F11's "asks the same of one name", and AGENTS.md's `check` verdict list and doctor next-command item (D3-F9, D1-F7). Word-level diffs of both files (`rvD-worddiff.py`) show only the edits in the tables below, `rvD-hunks.py` marks each re-wrapped hunk `WHITESPACE-ONLY`, and `rvD-mdstruct.py` finds the Markdown block structure, links and HTML identical (AGENTS.md 320/320 blocks, README.md 678/678). "Where" is the audited `ec4a7a0e` for README.md (it hashes the same up to #394, and #484 and #465 changed its text and not its line count, so those numbers still point at the same places on main); AGENTS.md lines after 154 read 5 higher on main, and 8 higher after the doctor's item 4, since #394. "Evidence" is code at `7a8b981d` (the line numbers below are that file's, re-derived at the merged head `48585e62` for every tool file that #394, #484, #465 and the later landings moved), and "run" is the audit's or this pass's offline run. | finding | where | was | now | evidence | |---|---|---|---|---| | D1-F3 | AGENTS.md:121 | "the preflight prints the install command" for git-filter-repo | "`execute` refuses without it, printing the install command" | adopt-project.py:4148-4158 (`_require_filter_repo`, `filter-repo-missing` + `FILTER_REPO_HINT` at 261-267), only call at 5652; `--preflight` checks git, Python, bootstrap, gh, helper, autocrlf only (setup-project.py:1110-1134); openRepoShape:212-216 | | D1-F4 | AGENTS.md:176-178 | the row reads `code: 0 of N source paths (seeded from template)` | the table's `code` row reads `0 of N source paths (seeded from template)` | adopt-project.py:6107-6108 prints `f" {leg:<6} {counts[leg]:>5} of {len(before)} source " f"paths{note}"`, no colon; run: ` code 0 of 2 source paths (seeded from template)` | | D1-F5 | AGENTS.md:182 | "`MedxGlass` descends from `openGlass` only if it PINS it (2026-09-02)" | "...or pins a layer that does and records the chain (`--referent-chain`; 2026-09-02, chains 2026-09-05)" | scaffold-project.py:379-391; run: `--pin openXglass@<sha> --referent-chain openXglass,openGlass --dry-run` printed "classifies as domain-descendant / assembly" | | D1-F6 | AGENTS.md:205-210, 258-259 | `openRepoShape --doctor` and `./shape-doctor.py` presented as one tool; "`--json` is the same report" | installed, it runs from a temporary clone deleted on exit and takes a path and nothing else; to act on a row (`--json`, `--placement-plan`, its next command) run `./shape-doctor.py --root <path>`; item 7 names `./shape-doctor.py --json` | openRepoShape:112-116 (EXIT trap), 329-352 (`shape_checkout` into `$WORKDIR/shape`), 379-392 (`run_doctor` clones when no checkout is beside it), 463-471 (`--doctor takes a path and nothing else`); run: the installed copy printed `NEXT python3 <tmp>/shape/adopt-project.py plan ...` and the directory was gone after exit; `--doctor <root> --json` printed `REFUSED: --doctor takes a path and nothing else`, exit 2 | | D1-F7 | AGENTS.md:226-232 | next commands are "`update-shape.py apply …`, `make bootstrap`, `bump-leg.py …`"; every one "carries the exact next command"; "each of those commands has its own section above" | "Every one carries the exact next command, where one can be named — `update-shape.py check …` and its `apply`, `git submodule update …` (in a holder, its `scripts/bootstrap.py`), the project's own validator"; "Each of those commands keeps its own refusals" | shape-doctor.py:2813 and 2828 (check NEXT), 3075-3089 (`legs` NEXT is `git submodule update`, `make bootstrap` only in the trailing comment), 5044 (holder `members` NEXT); no row's NEXT is a `bump-leg.py` command (`grep -c -i 'bump.leg\|bump_leg' shape-doctor.py` was 0 at `7a8b981d`; since #495 the `pins` row's reason names two `bump-leg.py --to` lines, as text, at shape-doctor.py:1847-1856 and 1904-1922 of `ea634043`); rows with no next command: 1393, 1526-1532, 5758 (`could not be run: {exc}`); only update-shape has a section in AGENTS.md | | D1-F9, D3-F7 | AGENTS.md:344-346, README.md:994-995, and the handbook beside it | after a bump the leg is left detached, and "`make bootstrap` in the root re-places it on its tracking branch AT the new pin; say so in your relay" (README.md: "`make bootstrap` re-places it on its tracking branch AT the new pin.") | AGENTS.md: "`make bootstrap` in the root puts it on its tracking branch AT the new pin, or says why not; relay which."; README.md and the handbook: "...re-places it on its tracking branch AT the new pin, or says why not." | templates/assembly-root/scripts/bootstrap.py at `ea634043`, `checkout_tracking_branch` (393-448): a branch behind the pin is fast-forwarded (275-340), and one ahead of it with no commit of its own is moved back (343-390, 177-187), both since #490 (`7348c57b`); a branch with commits of its own, or one that diverged, is not moved, and bootstrap prints `not moving an existing branch` (444-448); a commit made on the detached leg is left where it is, said as "which is neither" (313-322); a branch another worktree has checked out is not moved, and git's refusal is printed (226-228, 238-243) | | D2-F1 (part) | README.md:175-178, 217-220 | step 4's preflight "prints the command for THIS machine and asks once"; git commands are "the same commands that preflight offers to run for you" | "for `gh`, its login and its credential helper"; "the same commands `setup-project.py --preflight` offers to run" | setup.sh:85 (`command -v git ... \|\| die`, exit 2 by setup.sh:40) and :76; setup-project.py:1829-1831 (`bad(GIT_MISSING); die(PREREQ_MISSING)` ahead of `preflight(opts)`); the git offer (setup-project.py:926-932, rows 787-796) is reached only by `setup-project.py --preflight` (1820-1821); the `gh`, login and `gh auth setup-git` offers at 982-1078; run, no git on PATH: `openRepoShape --preflight` printed `REFUSED: git is not installed`, exit 2, no offer. The third place (README.md:434-436) is routed to #491 | | D2-F2 | README.md:181-183 | `openRepoShape --preflight` "exits 0 when everything is present and 1 when it is not" | "(`openRepoShape --preflight` exits 2 when `git` or a Python 3.9 or newer is missing)" | openRepoShape:446, 564 run setup.sh; setup.sh:76, 85 `die` (exit 2, setup.sh:40) before `preflight_only` (setup-project.py:1142-1166) | | D2-F3 | README.md:269-271 | "add `--visibility private` if you want that" | "`--visibility` defaults to `private`: add `--visibility public` (or `internal`) if you want that" | setup-project.py:428 (`self.visibility = "private"`), usage :138; scaffold-project.py:310-316; run: no `--visibility` printed `[ok] visibility private` | | D2-F4 | README.md:306-308 | the rehearsal leaves behind `./Atlas` and three bare repositories | "...and the scaffold's three working trees, in the temporary directory its `Working trees are at` line names" | scaffold-project.py:1570-1571 (`tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="openreposhape-")`, never removed), 1611; run: `/tmp/openreposhape-q5eeici3` held `atlas atlas-code atlas-spec` | | D2-F6 | README.md:436-438 | "a hyphenated or lowercase name is refused here" | "a hyphenated project name is refused here" (the review's N1: `Atlas-spec` and `Atlas-code` are hyphenated and pass) | contracts/repository-naming.yaml:335-345 (`^[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9]*(?:-spec\|-code)?$`); run: `validate-repository-naming.py --explain atlas atlas-spec atlas-code` exit 0, `At-las` exit 1 `naming-unclassified`; the rehearsal for `atlas` ended `DONE. atlas is scaffolded and bootstrapped.` | | D2-F8 | README.md:573-574 | every other family "is CamelCase" | "from the neutral-product, domain-descendant and family forms, all of which are CamelCase words" | contracts/repository-naming.yaml:412 (`^[a-z0-9]+(?:-[a-z0-9]+)*-wip$`), 182 (`-Install` is hyphenated) | | D2-F9 | README.md:619-620 | the rewrite covers "both HTTPS and SSH leg URLs" | "both HTTPS and scp-form SSH (`git@github.com:`) leg URLs" | templates/assembly-root/.github/workflows/validate.yml:160-161 (two `insteadOf` rewrites) and :69-73 (`*) continue` skips any other spelling); run: `ssh://git@github.com/...` went to ssh unrewritten | | D2-F10 | README.md:625-628 | a leg under another owner "can only be reached via `SHAPE_LEGS_TOKEN`" | "`SHAPE_LEGS_TOKEN` is read only when the App is not configured, so that leg is reachable only with the App secrets removed" | validate.yml:146-154 (`if [ -n "$SHAPE_LEGS_APP_TOKEN" ] ... elif [ -n "$SHAPE_LEGS_TOKEN" ]`); run: both set printed `leg credential source: app` | | D2-F11 | README.md:680-682 | `validate-repository-naming.py --referent-chain openXdox,openDox` asks the same question for one name | `... --pins openXdox --referent-chain openXdox,openDox ...` asks "the same of one name" | scripts/validate-repository-naming.py:522-528 ("The first entry must be in `--pins`"); run: without `--pins`, `codexDox` classified `project-leg/assembly` (exit 0); with it, `domain-descendant` | | D2-F12 | README.md:687-689 | `--link-source [PRODUCT=]<path>`, env, or a checkout beside the root | `--link-source PRODUCT=<path>`, env, a checkout beside the root, then a bare `--link-source <path>` | scripts/repo_shape.py:2589-2621 (`resolve_link_source`, bare path 4th); templates/assembly-root/scripts/validate-pins.py:597-632 uses the same order | | D3-F1 | README.md:736 | "the only change to it is ONE split commit" | "the only change to its history is ONE split commit" | adopt-project.py:5355-5376 (`_set_the_topic` runs `gh repo edit <source> --add-topic` on all three), called at 5734; the topic is not history | | D3-F2 | README.md:764-765 | `plan` "writes it into `follow_ups:`" for every such file | "lists up to eight per directory in `follow_ups:`, counting the rest" | adopt-project.py:1329-1337 (`hits[:8]`, then `… and N more file(s) under the code leg naming ...`) | | D3-F3 | README.md:810-811 | the row reads `code: 0 of N source paths (seeded from template)` | the table's `code` row reads `0 of N source paths (seeded from template)` | as D1-F4; run: ` code 0 of 3 source paths (seeded from template)` | | D3-F4 | README.md:958-960 | `sorted-ls-tree-r-v1` records "joined with LF" | "each followed by LF, the last one included" | scripts/repo_shape.py:904-928 (`digest.update(record); digest.update(b"\n")`); run over `HEAD:templates/code-root`: LF-joined gave `f44766c9...`, LF-terminated and `tree_digest()` both `fca315e6...` | | D3-F5 | README.md:976 | `--dry-run` "prints the move and writes nothing", and (with #484) "`--dry-run` writes nothing, so it runs there" | "# --dry-run prints the move; it fetches into the leg and writes nothing else"; "`--dry-run` fetches into the leg and writes nothing else, so it runs there and prints that command" | scripts/bump-leg.py at `48585e62`: `fetch_leg` is called at :1453 (refspec `+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*`, :854) and the `--dry-run` exit is at :1473, so the fetch comes first; the tool says so itself ("--dry-run: nothing was changed. The leg's object store was fetched into, which is how the digest above was computed", :1474-1477; docstring :447). Run (audit, offline): before the dry run the target object was absent from the leg and `origin/main` was f85673e; after it the object was present and `origin/main` was b9bce3e. #484 (landed) lets `--dry-run` run on the tracking branch (:1030 `and not dry_run`) and print `git switch -c`; it kept "writes nothing" at README.md:975 and in the refusal sentence, and the handbook (code comment and paragraph) says the same | | D3-F9 | README.md:1041-1044, AGENTS.md:285-288 | `check` prints `unchanged`, `upstream-changed`, `locally-modified` or `both` | "also `already-at-target` (the root has the target's bytes) and `upstream-removed`, `unmapped` and `copy-missing`; `apply` refuses the last three" (README; AGENTS.md appends the same four after `both`: `already-at-target`, `upstream-removed`, `unmapped` and `copy-missing`) | update-shape.py:239-256 (states, `CONFLICTS`, `ORDER`), 541-642 (`_classify_row`, `_row_verdict`) | | D3-F10 | README.md:1059-1063 | a `both` file "is refused outright" | "refused until a human merges it, commits the merge and re-runs with `--accept-local <path>`" | update-shape.py:2515-2535 (`_refuse_conflicts` excludes an accepted `both`), :1582 (`check` says "Merge it by hand, commit it, then `apply --accept-local <path>`"); run: `apply ... --accept-local Makefile` after the hand merge committed, exit 0 | | D3-F12 | README.md:1137-1139 | "every one that is not `ok` names the exact command that fixes it" | "a row that is not `ok` names the exact command that fixes it whenever there is one to run" | shape-doctor.py:1429, 3026, 5337 build `Row(..., None, ...)` with no fix; run: `--json` on a plain directory gave `contents n/a` with no next | | D3-F13 | README.md:1151-1153 | `COMPLIANT`: "every row ok"; one `SHAPE BEHIND` spelling; `DRIFTED`: "a copy was edited here, or a leg is off its pin" | "no row is a `FINDING`"; adds `(pin <a> -> <b>, no copied file differs)`; "edited, deleted or no longer maps onto the standard, or a leg (a member, in a holder) is off its pin" | shape-doctor.py:5942 (`COMPLIANT` is the end of the ladder, `n/a machine` is always there), 5875-5899 (`behind_verdict`), 5775-5795 (`drifted_file_reasons`), 5796-5824 (`drifted_reasons`) | | D3-F14 | README.md:1158 | "Exit 3 is usage or environment" | "Exit 3 is usage or environment (a flag argparse rejects is exit 2) — nothing about it is a statement about the tree you pointed at: no such path, a refused `--placement-plan`, a `shape-doctor.py` not sitting in a checkout of the standard, or a pin naming a commit **this** checkout does not carry (`CANNOT ANSWER`)" | shape-doctor.py:6029-6051 (plain argparse, exit 2), 6061-6082 (the exit-3 paths, among them `except Refusal: return 3` for the flag), 4547-4553 (`shape-doctor-no-placement-audit`), docstring :227 (`3 usage or environment`); tests/test_shape_doctor.py:5844-5858 asserts `returncode == 3`; runs: `--bogus` rc 2, `--root <missing>` rc 3, `--root <plain dir> --placement-plan pp.yaml` rc 3 | | D3-F15 | README.md:1273-1278 | bare `park` "PARKS EVERY ESTATE it finds" | "lists every estate ... and ASKS whether to park them all (with no terminal on stdin it refuses and names `--all`); `park --all`, or `-a`, parks them all unasked ... skipping a standalone root with no Speckit overlay (Brett Heap's RULINGs of 2026-09-10, the later superseding #91's unasked sweep)"; `resume` has no `--all` | openRepoTools `park` at GitHub's main `f87fd5a` (the review fetched it: nothing newer): header 17-41, usage 77-100, sweep skip at 802-808, `resume` refuses `--all` at 863-867; runs: bare `park </dev/null` outside an estate gave `REFUSED ... park --all parks every estate below without asking`, rc 2; `park --all --dry-run` gave `skipped Solo (no Speckit overlay)`, rc 0 | | MISPLACED (new, #394) | README.md:1176-1180 | `placement` "names the paths the policy would have put somewhere else" | "...and a submodule in a leg other than the one its `submodules:` record names" | since #394 (`7a8b981d`) a submodule in a leg other than the one `project.yaml`'s `submodules:` records for it is `misplaced`, counted in `MISPLACED`, exit 1: shape-doctor.py:3604-3624 (`recorded_placement`), 3754-3769 (`leg_submodules`); tests/test_shape_doctor.py:6770 (`test_a_submodule_in_the_other_leg_from_its_record_is_misplaced`), 7219. AGENTS.md already says it (#394's item 4). The verdict table's `MISPLACED` row sits directly above #468's `INVALID` row, so it is not edited here: #468 is asked for it | | N7 | AGENTS.md:259-262 (item 6) | "`openRepoShape --preflight` is what offers to install one" | "`openRepoShape --preflight` offers only the `gh` set-up" | the preflight never checks git-filter-repo (setup-project.py:1110-1135; openRepoShape:212-216) and setup.sh:85 exits 2 for a missing git before the preflight; the offers are `gh`, its login and its credential helper (982-1078) | `docs/handbook.html` repeats these and is corrected where it does: the preflight offers, `git` and the credential helper (four platform panels), the `openRepoShape --preflight` exit codes, the visibility default, the rehearsal leftovers, the CamelCase sentence, the credential rewrite and `SHAPE_LEGS_TOKEN`, the source repository's one change, the digest definition, `check`'s verdicts and the `both` refusal, the doctor's row sentence, verdict table and exit 3, the placement paragraph's submodule, and bare `park`. The handbook says more than the README in four places (the `git`-before-the-preflight sentences in the Linux panel, the Windows git offer "only under `py setup-project.py --preflight`", glosses for the three non-comparable `check` states, park "from anywhere"); all are true. Its footer's history prose gains "added (#483)". | finding | where | evidence at `71359744`, the merge of `48585e62` | |---|---|---| | D1-F8 | AGENTS.md:323-328, 337-339 | the block carries `git -C <path> switch -c <branch>` (AGENTS.md:335), item 3 says "A new project stands on its tracking branch; the dry run runs there and prints the `git switch -c`, but the real run is refused" (:348-349); scripts/bump-leg.py:1030 refuses on the tracking branch only `and not dry_run`; tests/test_bump_leg_dry_run_tracking.py | | D2-F7 | README.md:502-504 | README.md:502 `git -C ../Atlas switch -c <branch> # the tool will not commit on main` | | D3-F6 | README.md:974-977, 987-992 | README.md:988-991 "`git switch -c <branch>` first; `--dry-run` ... runs there and prints that command" | | D2-F13 | README.md:705-707 | #465 rewrote the sentence: README.md:705-707 now reads "Finding neither is a named SKIP, exit 0: no checkout and no network does not make a descent a lie. A checkout that cannot answer is the finding `neutral-pin-source-unreadable`", and the handbook says the same (1139-1141). True: a source that is found but cannot answer is a FINDING, templates/assembly-root/scripts/validate-pins.py:796; the SKIP is only "no source found and `gh api` fails" | | D2-F14 | README.md:708-709 | #465 deleted the whole sentence, so "a pin file the declaration names but that is not there, is reported as drift" is gone from README.md and the handbook (the missing file is the refusal `neutral-pin-missing`, validate-pins.py:699). It also dropped the true half, "A digest that recomputes differently is reported as drift" (the finding `neutral-pin-digest-mismatch`, validate-pins.py:853): not a false statement; see "Not holding #483 open" below | | D3-F8 | README.md:1028, 1095-1097 | #465 rewrote both: README.md:1027-1029 "a project runs its own gate, which never consults this standard (its validators' one possible network read is `validate-pins.py`'s `gh api` recheck of a neutral product's pin, above)" and :1095-1098 "That line adds no network call ... (Its pins gate may ask `gh api`; see above.)"; the handbook the same (1403, 1448). True: `validate-pins.py` falls back to `gh api` when no local checkout answers (scripts/repo_shape.py:931 `tree_digest_from_gh`) | Evidence is at `ea634043`, the merge of `70d0d1b3` with the D1-F9/D3-F7 correction; `9ac90d16` changes one README word in place and the footer blob, so the line numbers hold at this head. The runs are this round's, offline: local bare remotes, a stub `gh`, a blank identity. | finding | where | evidence | |---|---|---| | D1-F1 | AGENTS.md:22-24, 56-62, 78-80 | #491 reads the yes from the controlling terminal (setup-project.py:1322, `ask()` at 1325-1432; the confirmation at 1770-1779), and setup.sh hands the child the pipe (282-283). Run under a pty: the piped `cat setup.sh \| bash -s -- … --local-remote-dir …` asked `Type yes to continue:`, and `no` gave `REFUSED: not confirmed; nothing was created.`, exit 1. With no terminal at all (AGENTS.md:23, 83-86) it prints the plan and refuses (1770-1776): `REFUSED: this will create THREE repositories and there is no terminal to confirm on…`, exit 2 | | D2-F5 | README.md:315-336, 414-420 | the same read, for the README's three one-liner blocks | | D1-F2 | AGENTS.md:76-77 | #491 took the audit's text (AGENTS.md:73-75). `_choose_org` (setup-project.py:1244-1258) takes a fork's `origin` organisation (run: `[ok] organisation acmefork (from the \`origin\` remote…)`) and refuses opensoft's own without `--org` (run: `REFUSED: you are running from the upstream checkout (…); pass --org <your-org>.`, exit 2) | | D2-F1 (rest) | README.md:434-436 | #491's words, kept whole in the merge (README.md:432-445). The `gh` offers are the install (setup-project.py:992-1005, `INSTALL_OFFERS` at 795-798), the login (1009, 1015-1032) and git's credential helper (1051-1083, asked only once `gh` is ready, 1134-1137); git and Python are refused before any offer (setup.sh:76 and 85, exit 2 by :40). Run with no git on PATH: `openRepoShape --preflight` printed `REFUSED: git is not installed. Install it: https://git-scm.com/downloads`, exit 2, and offered nothing | | D3-F11 | README.md:1130-1133 | #468's sentence (README.md:1130-1134) names `agent files` for a holder and `machine` for a plain directory, as the doctor's `CHECKS` registry has them (shape-doctor.py:6115-6155, at 6135 and 6153). Run, `--json` on a plain directory: the rows naming, contents, way-in, machine | | `MISPLACED` table row (the review's) | README.md:1151, and the handbook's verdict table | #468's row reads "...or a submodule in a leg other than the one its `submodules:` record names" (README.md:1155, handbook:1509); shape-doctor.py:3843-3862, 3993-4008 | Every finding of the three audits is corrected above or settled by a pull request that has landed. A fourth read took what main changed in README.md and AGENTS.md since the audits' `ec4a7a0e` (#394, #484, #465, #468, #491: `git diff -U0 ec4a7a0 70d0d1b`), every line this branch does not itself rewrite, and asked the audits' question by their method. It found one false statement, D1-F9/D3-F7's own sentence as #484 kept it, corrected above, and checked the rest true: AGENTS.md 23, 63-67, 73-81, 83-86, 88-96, 155-158, 252-254, 335, 347-349 and 357-361; README.md 333-338, 343, 432-445, 503, 508, 699-709, 987-992, 1028-1033, 1095-1098, 1118-1136, 1155-1156 and 1163-1171 (line numbers at `ea634043`). Read in code only: the offers' real-GitHub paths and Windows (the real `gh` never ran). Not read: `park` and `resume`, which live in openRepoTools. **True but loose, left as they are.** AGENTS.md:83 and README.md:440 say a run with no terminal "stops after the plan"; a missing prerequisite stops it earlier, at the preflight (exit 2), which AGENTS.md:88 covers. README.md:1216-1218 says the machine check runs "with stdin closed"; the doctor also starts it in a session of its own (shape-doctor.py:1284-1285), which is what keeps the terminal out since #492. AGENTS.md's doctor item 3 does not say to ask the human which of #495's two `bump-leg.py --to` lines to run: an omission, not a false statement. **Outside these files.** `scripts/bump-leg.py:1513` still prints "re-places it on its tracking branch AT the new pin" after every bump. It is on #458's checklist with the rest of #490's follow-ups, and a docs-only pull request leaves it there. **Not holding #483 open: an omission.** #465 deleted "A digest that recomputes differently is reported as drift" together with its false clause. So README.md (698-709) and the handbook beside it no longer say what a recomputed neutral-pin digest that disagrees does. Nothing there is false, so it does not hold #483 open. Both files are at their caps, and the sentence needs about two more README lines that no untouched paragraph gives back, so it is not added here. Re-checked at `ea634043`: the finding is validate-pins.py:968-970 and 1140-1142 (exit 1), the refusal 814-816 and 1172-1175 (exit 2). A sentence for whoever next edits that paragraph: "A digest that recomputes differently is the finding `neutral-pin-digest-mismatch` (exit 1); a pin file the declaration names but that is not there is the refusal `neutral-pin-missing` (exit 2)." A robustness note on main's `test_the_documents_say_what_an_assistant_does_with_no_terminal` (#491): it strips `<...>` from README.md as well as from the HTML page, and a README line holding `<(` and no `>` swallows lines up to the next `>`; stripping tags from the `.html` page only would make that test indifferent to such a line. `git merge-tree --write-tree` of `ea634043` against the open pull requests that edit these files: clean with #503 (`6fe17be5`); #506 (`f184a51c`) and #486-#488's #507 (`708f3bbb`) each conflict in the handbook footer alone (its history prose and `README.md blob` line), and README.md and AGENTS.md merge clean with all three and stay at 1422 and 490 lines. Whichever lands later recomputes `git hash-object README.md` and keeps every "added (#n)" clause. #394, #484, #465, #468 (`57c85e92`), #490 (`7348c57b`), #508 (`aa4e1f59`) and #491 (`da197359`) are merged here. - At this head (`9ac90d16`): `tests/test_repo_hygiene.py tests/test_agents_md_codes.py tests/test_cli_reference.py tests/test_setup_project_py.py tests/test_setup_sh.py`, 277 passed; `scripts/validate-repository-naming.py --explain Atlas Atlas-spec Atlas-code` exits 0 (`project-leg`: assembly, spec, code) and `--explain At-las At-las-spec At-las-code` exits 1 (`FINDING naming-unclassified`), so only the project name's hyphen is refused. - At `ea634043`: `tests/test_repo_hygiene.py tests/test_agents_md_codes.py tests/test_cli_reference.py`, 122 passed (the same on the merge `94793aeb`); `tests/test_setup_project_py.py tests/test_setup_sh.py`, which read README.md and the handbook for #491's no-terminal route, 155 passed; `tests/test_free_plan_hint.py` with the AGENTS.md step 7 tests of `tests/test_adopt_late_failure.py` and `tests/test_adopt_github_exits.py`, 18 passed; and on the merge, `tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py`, 23 passed. A stub `gh` first on PATH (it logged no call), `GH_TOKEN` bogus, an empty `GH_CONFIG_DIR`, a blank identity. - `rvD-worddiff.py`, `rvD-hunks.py` and `rvD-mdstruct.py` over `ea634043` against its parent: four `WORDS CHANGED` hunks, all of them the D1-F9/D3-F7 sentence and the blob, and no re-wrap; block structure, links, HTML and code spans identical (README.md 678/678 blocks, AGENTS.md 322/322). The merge `94793aeb` against `70d0d1b3` changes the same lines as `83cfad54` against `aa4e1f59` (366 insertions, 336 deletions), apart from the two resolved hunks. - Review round four (the first reviewer, at `ea634043`): APPROVE WITH NITS (0 blockers, 0 should-fixes, 3 nits). - It ran `git show --remerge-diff` on every merge since round three (`71359744`, `fb6a9ab4`, `83cfad54`, `94793aeb`). Each hand resolution is a named conflict hunk, and no row, clause or fact was lost. - It reproduced the D1-F9/D3-F7 sentence with a real bump and `make bootstrap` in seven cases, and each placed the leg or said why not: a branch behind the pin; ahead with no commit of its own; with commits of its own; diverged; checked out in another worktree; a commit on the detached leg; a move a local change blocks. - It re-checked every routed row and ten moved-evidence rows, and read the whole of main's change since `ec4a7a0e`, finding nothing else false. - It ran the hygiene, codes, CLI-reference, setup, bootstrap-after-bump and free-plan tests: 314 passed. - Its nits: N1, the hyphenated project name, made at `9ac90d16`; N2, a run with no terminal stops at the preflight rather than after the plan when something is missing, which AGENTS.md:88 covers; N3, this description. - Two `bootstrap.py` defects it met while reproducing are on #458's checklist (issuecomment-6142614866). - At `83cfad54`: `tests/test_repo_hygiene.py tests/test_agents_md_codes.py tests/test_cli_reference.py`, 119 passed. On `fb6a9ab4`, the merge of `57c85e92`, the same three gave 119 passed, and `tests/test_shape_doctor.py tests/test_doctor_unfinished_merge.py tests/test_free_plan_hint.py tests/test_openreposhape_command.py tests/test_shape_advisory.py` gave 465 passed, 3 skipped (the doctor's PowerShell line, which prints only on a Windows host). The table's "no row is a `FINDING`" holds with the `merge` row: `shape-doctor.py` returns `COMPLIANT` only at :6171, after :6168-6170 answer `INVALID (<ids>)` for any `FINDING` row, and `merge` is a `FINDING` only for an unmerged path (:5879; a merge with none left is a `note`, :5862). All runs with a stub `gh` first on PATH, `GH_TOKEN` bogus, an empty `GH_CONFIG_DIR`. - At `71359744`, the merge of `48585e62`: the three files, 119 passed (a stub `gh` first on PATH, `GH_TOKEN` bogus, an empty `GH_CONFIG_DIR`; the stub logged no call). - The same three files on a throwaway merge of `f35e59fa` with #491's head (merge-tree, commit-tree, a detached worktree, footer resolved, then removed): 122 passed, and `tests/test_setup_project_py.py tests/test_setup_sh.py -k no_terminal`: 8 passed. The failure the second review found (`test_the_documents_say_what_an_assistant_does_with_no_terminal[README.md]`, 1 failed, 122 passed) came from the `bash <(` lines this commit removes. - `tests/test_adopt_late_failure.py::test_agents_md_step_7_names_the_exit_the_tool_prints` and `tests/test_adopt_github_exits.py -k "step_7 or agents"` (round two, on `ccf520bd`): 2 passed; they read AGENTS.md step 7, which is untouched. - `rvD-worddiff.py`, `rvD-hunks.py` and `rvD-mdstruct.py` over the third commit against its merge parent: every changed region is one of the corrections above (the `bash <(` blocks back to main's text, D3-F5, the park parenthetical, the placement sentence and the three word trims), and the two `WHITESPACE-ONLY` hunks are the family steps going back to main's bytes; block structure 320/320 and 678/678, links, HTML and code spans identical. - No test greps a phrase this pull request changed: the old phrases appear under `tests/` only in history comments and the doctor's docstring. The third head (f35e59f) was re-verified: APPROVE WITH NITS (0/0/4), all four in this description and fixed there. Main 48585e6 (#465) was then merged as 7135974, and 57c85e9 (#468) as fb6a9ab; aa4e1f5 (#508) merged clean as 83cfad5. Main 70d0d1b (#491) was merged as 94793ae, and ea63404 corrects D1-F9/D3-F7. A fourth review round at ea63404 covered every merge since f35e59f (remerge-diff: no row, clause or fact lost), the bootstrap sentence in seven reproduced cases, and the whole docs delta since ec4a7a0: APPROVE WITH NITS (0/0/3), and #483 can close. Its N1, "a hyphenated project name", is 9ac90d1. CI is green on Linux, macOS and Windows, with SonarCloud passing, at 9ac90d1. Main cc8f2da (#376), which landed after its last merge, touches none of its files, and the combined tree passed the docs and setup tests (277 passed). Closes #483 Lane: openreposhape-5 (openRepoShape-5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… text placeholders, so `--id 007`, `--tracking-branch 2026`, `--spec-path true` or `--org null` read back as typed, and `family.py add` quotes a member id alike (#259) (#395) Brett Heap ruled on 2026-10-12: "quote #259". The templates now write each text field a tool fills from a value it was given between double quotes: | template | fields | |---|---| | `templates/assembly-root/project.yaml` | `id`, `elected_on`, `visibility`, `tracking_branch`, the spec leg's `path`, the code leg's `path` | | `templates/assembly-root/contracts/spec-pin.yaml`, `code-pin.yaml` | `submodule_path` | | `templates/family-root/family.yaml` | `id`, `org`, `created_on`, `visibility`, `tracking_branch` | `render` already spells a value between a YAML template's double quotes with `repo_shape.double_quoted` (#284). The single-pass `render` from #316, on main as 34ecbc2, does the same through `YAML_PLACEHOLDER_RE`. So each value reads back exactly. An ordinary value renders as it did before, plus the two quote characters. `family.yaml`'s `org:` is quoted along with the four fields #259 names. It is the same defect in the same file: `family.py init --org 2026` and `--org null` pass `checked_value`, and on c7c02fa the holder then fails `family-org` (#307 lists the `--org null` row). Taking `org:` back out is not a one-line revert. It fails 14 of the new tests (the 8 `family.yaml:org` in-memory cases, and all 6 `family.py init` rows, because every row of `FAMILIES` passes a misread `--org`), and it would also take the `ORG` row out of `TEXT_FIELDS` and put plain `--org` values into `FAMILIES`. The lane keeps `org:` quoted, as the same defect in the same file, unless Brett says otherwise. `scripts/family.py`: `_member_lines` writes each member's own `project.yaml` id into the holder's `members:` block. That id now reads back exactly, so a bare `007` in the row came back as 7, and `validate-family.py` would report `member-id-mismatch` for a member it had just pinned. `_member_id` quotes an id only when the reader would not read the bare text back as the same text. No row whose id reads back as text moves: `irrs` is still `id: irrs`. Two edges: - A legacy row whose bare id the reader misreads moves once. A holder written before this change, by `family.py add` of a member scaffolded with `--id 2026`, holds `id: 2026`. The next `bump`, `add` or `remove` of that holder rewrites it as `id: "2026"`. That is harmless: `validate-family.py` compares with `str()` and passes before and after. - Mixed versions. A `family.py` from before this change, run against a holder this branch wrote, turns `id: "007"` back into `id: 007`, and `validate-family.py` then fails `member-id-mismatch` (the member declares `007`, `family.yaml` records `7`). A current `family.py` that rewrites the holder next then writes that row as `id: "7"`. Nothing in this branch can prevent it: run `family.py` from a current checkout on a holder that has such a member. Left unquoted on purpose: `topic` (`xf-project-<id>`), every `repository` (`<org>/<Name>`; the slash keeps it text), `SHAPE_REPOSITORY` and `DIGEST_DEFINITION` (constants), and the block or list placeholders (`NEUTRAL_PRODUCT_PINS`, `*_NAMING`, `SHAPE_FILES`). **Why.** Every reader of these files uses `repo_shape`'s YAML subset. It reads a bare `007` as 7, `2026` and `20261011` as numbers, `1.5` as a float, `true` as True and `null` as None. The checks on the flags (`PROJECT_ID_RE`, `checked_value`, the leg-path rule) accept every one of these. Reproduced on c7c02fa, with local bare remotes only: - `scaffold-project.py --id 2026|007|true|null|20261011` exits 0, and the project's own `validate-manifest.py` then fails `manifest-id`. - `--spec-path 2026 --code-path 007` fails `manifest-leg-path`, and `validate-pins.py` exits 2. - `--tracking-branch 007` pushes each leg on `007`, and the root's `bootstrap.py` then puts the legs on a local `7` with `fatal: no upstream configured`. `true` and `null` do the same on `True` and `main`. - `adopt-project.py execute` with `--tracking-branch 007` does the same; `--id 007|20261011` gives `manifest-id`; leg paths `2026`/`007` give `manifest-leg-path`. - `family.py init --id 2026|007|true|null|20261011` gives `family-id`; `--org 2026|null` gives `family-org`; `--tracking-branch 007|true|null` reads back as 7/True/None. On this branch every one of those rows reads back as typed, bootstraps onto the typed branch with `origin/<branch>` as upstream, and passes the root's own validators. **Every reader checked.** Every reader reads these fields through `load_yaml`/`parse_yaml` into a dict. None uses a line regex, `split(":")`, `startswith("<field>: ")` or a whole-line rewrite of them: - `templates/assembly-root/scripts/bootstrap.py`: `tracking_branch`, leg `path`. - `validate-manifest.py`: `id`, `elected_on`, `visibility`, leg `path`. - `validate-pins.py`: `submodule_path` against the manifest's `path`. The pin side is read as it stands and the manifest side goes through `str()`, so the two differ in type exactly when a bare value is misread (that is the `pin-path-mismatch` row above). With both lines quoted they are the same text. - `validate-repository-naming.py`: `str(id)` for the topic. - `templates/family-root/scripts/validate-family.py`: `id`, `org`, `created_on`, `visibility`, `str()` member-id compare. - `siblings.py`, family `bootstrap.py`. - `scripts/bump-leg.py`: `tracking`, leg `path`. Its `rewrite_pin` rewrites only `commit:` and `tree_sha256:`. - `update-shape.py`: `tracking_branch_of`. `rewrite_manifest` touches only the `shape:` block. - `scripts/family.py`: `tracking()`, the member's id, and the `members:` rewrite. The member-id writer is the one fixed here. - `shape-doctor.py`: leg `path`, member row `path`, working-clone `str(id)` compare. - `adopt-project.py`: plan reads and `_template_values`. - `setup-project.py`: `family.yaml` `name`/`kind` only. - `scripts/shape_advisory.py`: the single-repository record only. The `str()` fallbacks (`bootstrap.py`, `adopt-project.py`'s `checked_value`) stay, because projects made before this keep their bare lines. **Pins.** The four files are TEMPLATED, not COPIED, so no row of any project's `contracts/shape-pin.yaml` names them. `Atlas` was scaffolded and `family.py init Contoso` was run on c7c02fa and on this branch. Each `contracts/shape-pin.yaml` differs only in `commit:` and `digests.tree_sha256`, which identify the standard itself and change with every commit; every per-file `sha256` row is identical. `update-shape.py check` of the c7c02fa project and holder against this branch reports every copied file `unchanged` (11 and 10 rows): "no copied file differs; `apply` would move the pin alone". **Tests.** - New: `tests/test_template_text_placeholders.py`, 123 tests: - Each of the 13 fields is rendered with each of 8 values the reader misreads (`2026 007 1.5 true null 20261011 ~ False`), and must read back exactly. - 6 `scaffold-project.py` runs, then a recursive clone, `bootstrap.py`, the three validators, and `bump-leg.py`, which refuses on the tracking branch and finds the leg at its path on a branch of its own. - 6 `adopt-project.py` `plan`/`check`/`execute` runs into local bare remotes, then a clone, `bootstrap.py` and the validators. - 6 `family.py init` runs. - One `family.py add` of members whose ids are `007` and `true`. - **All 123 fail on c7c02fa.** - `true`/`null` through adopt: `plan` writes them bare into the plan, and the plan's reader then misreads them. That belongs to the plan writer, #181 (lane 1). Those two rows quote the value in the plan by hand, as #181's writer will, and test `check`/`execute`. - Mutation probes: reverting any one of the 13 quoted lines fails 8 cases of its field. Reverting `_member_id` fails the member test (the rows read 7/True). - The `try/except YamlError` in `_member_id` is guarded by the follow-up commit. The review found that calling the parse directly left the member test passing. Ids such as `[`, `{`, `&a`, `*a` and `!t` reach the `except` (they raise `YamlError` bare), and `_member_id` returns each one exactly, as it does 34 adversarial inputs in all (the review's in-process probe). `test_a_member_id_the_reader_refuses_bare_is_rewritten_between_quotes` (7 cases: `[`, `{`, `&a`, `*a`, `!t`, an unclosed `'` and an unclosed `"`) opens a hand-edited holder whose row holds the id between double quotes, rewrites the `members:` block with `Family.rewritten`, and asks that the id read back exactly and the text come out byte for byte. With the `try/except` removed all 7 fail with the reader's `YamlError`, and with the `except` returning the bare text all 7 fail too; the old member test still passes under the first of those mutants. - 14 existing tests that asserted or edited a bare rendered line now spell it quoted: `test_manifest_validator` ×5, `test_pin_validator`, `test_reference_default`, `test_scaffold_e2e` ×2, `test_setup_project_py`, `test_setup_sh`, `test_family`, `test_shape_doctor` ×2. - Targeted runs on this branch: | files | result | |---|---| | new file + `test_template_quoted_values`, `test_scaffold_e2e`, `test_scaffold_pin_and_reuse`, `test_scaffold_leg_paths`, `test_scaffold_leg_path_collisions`, `test_reuse_visibility`, `test_reference_default` | 405 passed | | the six adopt files | 491 passed, 1 skipped (the MedxEHR clone is not set) | | `test_family`, `test_family_add_refusals`, `test_family_member_path`, `test_manifest_validator`, `test_pin_validator`, `test_bump_leg`, `test_update_shape`, `test_update_shape_pr_base`, `test_setup_project_py`, `test_park_resume_targets`, `test_repo_hygiene`, `test_cli_reference`, `test_setup_sh` | 603 passed | | `test_shape_doctor` | 241 passed, 3 skipped (Windows-only), 1 failed; that one test was fixed, and with its sibling it reran at 2 passed | **The review.** An independent opus review at 233dc71 (the branch's first commit) found no code defect. Its verdict was CHANGES NEEDED (0 blockers, 2 should-fixes, 6 nits) because it asked for this description and its composition counts to be corrected, and they are. Its evidence: - **Readers and rewriters.** Every reader in the shipped tree reads the 13 lines through `load_yaml`/`parse_yaml`, and no line regex or whole-line rewrite touches them. It read `bump-leg.py` `rewrite_pin`, `update-shape.py` `rewrite_shape_pin` and `rewrite_manifest`, `family.py` `rewritten`, the three validators, `siblings.py`, both `bootstrap.py`, the doctor, `setup-project.py`, the workflows, the Makefile and `setup.sh`. No test among main's 17 commits since c7c02fa (through #245's 161c6c9) edits one of these lines bare. - **`_member_id`, the one rewriter changed.** A mutant that writes every id bare fails the member test (the rows read back as `{'IRRS': 7, 'IRSS': True}`). A mutant that quotes every id fails `b" id: irqs" in lines`. So the minimal-churn choice is tested both ways. - **Old projects and holders.** Against a control commit (c7c02fa plus an unrelated README edit), a project and a holder made on c7c02fa give identical `update-shape.py check` and `shape-doctor.py` output, up to the shas. `check --at 233dc71` reports all 11 project files and all 10 holder files `unchanged` and says `no copied file differs`. The doctor's verdict is `COMPLIANT, SHAPE BEHIND (... no copied file differs)` for the control and for 233dc71. This branch's `family.py add` and `bump` on a c7c02fa holder leave the old `atlas` row and the header byte for byte, apart from the legacy-id edge described at the top. - **Tests.** All 123 new tests fail on c7c02fa (`123 failed`) and pass on 233dc71 (`123 passed`). The 14 changed existing tests pass (49 passed). - **Not covered.** Windows and macOS were reviewed by reading and not run: the plan edit and the member-row check are in bytes, and nothing writes to git's stdin in text mode. Of `test_shape_doctor.py` and `test_family.py` the review ran only the changed tests. **Follow-up commit.** A second commit, `3894aa8`, answers two nits from the review, and changes no behaviour. The `_member_id` docstring said "no existing holder's `members:` block moves by a byte", which was false: the next `bump`, `add` or `remove` of a holder written before this change rewrites a legacy `id: 2026` row as `id: "2026"`, harmlessly, because `validate-family.py` compares with `str()`. The docstring now says exactly that, and a grep of every comment and docstring the branch added for "by a byte" and "moves" found one more copy, in the member test's docstring, corrected the same way. The `try/except YamlError` in `_member_id` is guarded by a new test (see Tests), so the new file holds 130 tests. Every count above that says 123 (123 new tests, all failing on c7c02fa and passing on 233dc71) is for the first commit; the follow-up commit adds the 7. The `except` also carries a comment saying which ids reach it. **Composition at the landing head (4984651).** `49846518` is GitHub's update-branch merge of origin/main `cc8f2da4` (#376, a `--trailer` value carried into the commit as typed) into `3220c9ee`. Git reported no conflict, and the merge has no hand edit. #376 changed `scripts/family.py` and `tests/test_family.py`, which this branch also changes. None of the lines it added under `tests/` names a key the templates now quote. The coordinator ran targeted tests on this head, Linux only, before CI: - main's changed test files (`tests/test_commit_trailers.py`, `tests/test_family.py`, `tests/test_bump_leg.py`, `tests/test_update_shape.py`) with `tests/test_family_add_member_id.py`: 421 passed, 1 skipped (a case-insensitive disk only); - this branch's template set (`tests/test_template_text_placeholders.py`, `tests/test_template_quoted_values.py`, `tests/test_scaffold_manifest_values.py`, `tests/test_bootstrap_spelling.py`, `tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py`) with the hygiene, CLI-reference and AGENTS.md-codes tests: 652 passed. **Composition at 3220c9e.** `3220c9ee` is GitHub's update-branch merge of origin/main `70d0d1b3` into `e5e768bc`. It brings in three commits: #491 (da19735), in which `setup-project.py` asks at the person's own terminal; #374 (7ab11cf), update-shape's NEXT quoting; and #384 (70d0d1b), adopt's `_spelled` plan values. Git reported no conflict, and the merge has no hand edit. #491 changed `tests/test_setup_project_py.py` and `tests/test_setup_sh.py`, which this branch also changes. A grep of the lines main added under `tests/` for the keys the templates now quote found two hits, and neither reads a rendered template line: `tests/test_update_shape_next_quoting.py` writes its own `project.yaml`, and `tests/test_adopt_question_and_submodule_spelling.py` edits a plan's `- path:`/`question:` entry, which `adopt-project.py` writes bare. The coordinator ran targeted tests on the same tree (`e5a74d19`), Linux only, before CI: - six of main's eight changed test files (the setup, update-shape, `openRepoShape` command and doctor-row tests): 365 passed; - main's other two (adopt's spelling and repo hygiene), `tests/test_adopt_github_exits.py` and nine more files of this branch's sixteen-file set: 943 passed. **Composition, refreshed again 2026-10-13 (head e5e768b).** `6d108d18` merges origin/main `56713e21` into `6cbbac60`. That brings in two commits: 5e02abe, the doctor's and `validate-pins.py`'s gitlink repairs, and 56713e2 (#479), in which adopt's `plan` takes the tracking branch from the source's default branch. Git reported no conflict and `docs/cli.md` auto-merged; the merge has no hand edit. Two kinds of test failed on it, and two commits fix them: - **`7968f902`** changes one expected literal, at `tests/test_adopt_github_exits.py:675`, for `test_a_source_on_another_branch_opens_its_pull_request_against_it[master]` and `[trunk]`. - The test reads the adopted root's `project.yaml`, which this branch's template renders as `tracking_branch: "master"`, so it now expects the quoted line. - The look-alike lines at `:743` and `tests/test_adopt_tracking_branch.py:73-76` read a plan, which `adopt-project.py` writes bare, and they stay as they are. - **`e5e768bc`** adds `git("branch", branch, cwd=source)` to `tests/test_template_text_placeholders.py::test_an_adoption_reads_back_every_value_it_was_given`. - All six rows had failed at `check` with `plan-tracking-branch-missing`: #479 refuses a tracking branch (`2026`, `007`, `1.5`, `20261011`, `true`, `null`) the source does not have, and the test's source had only `main`. - The source now carries each row's branch, in the flag rows and the by-hand rows alike. The test's assertions are unchanged. Targeted runs, Linux only: - On e5e768b: main's seven changed test files, 211 passed; this branch's sixteen-file set, 1223 passed, 2 skipped. - On 7968f90: the same sixteen files gave 6 failed, which are the six rows e5e768b fixes. The scaffold, setup, doctor and family set gave 1094 passed, 22 skipped, and twelve further template-grep files gave 1259 passed. - `render-cli-reference.py --check` is ok. **Composition, refreshed 2026-10-13 (head 6cbbac6).** `d651b594` merges origin/main `aa4e1f59` (#508) into `d526f768`. - **The one conflict.** Git conflicted in one file, `tests/test_adopt_manifest_values.py`, in four hunks, all against #356 (965420b, #293/#294). #356 refuses an `elected_on:` that `election_date` does not read, as `election-date-malformed`, before the validator is asked (`_manifest_values` returns None, adopt-project.py:2258). - **Resolved by what the merged tree prints**, measured with `adopt-project.py plan`/`check`/`execute` into local bare remotes: - `id: "007"` checks clean and `execute` writes it as typed, so it stays in `TEXT_THE_TEMPLATE_NOW_HOLDS`. - `visibility: "true"` gets the validator's `manifest-visibility: visibility is 'true'`. - `elected_on: "20261011"` gets #294's one finding, "the plan's `elected_on:` is the text '20261011'", and the validator is not asked. That row keeps this branch's list, `TEXT_THE_VALIDATOR_REFUSES`, with main's sentence. - Two tests git merged cleanly now ask `said_of`, as main's own rows do: `test_check_refuses_a_text_value_the_validator_refuses` and `test_where_a_misread_rule_judges_the_rest_the_validator_still_answers`. - **Two more failures that no hunk showed**, fixed in the same merge: - `[branch-tilde]` in `tests/test_scaffold_manifest_values.py` was this branch's own `xfail(strict=True)` until #355 landed as 6c2a371, so it XPASSed. The mark is off, and the row asserts `REFUSED scaffold-bad-tracking-branch:`. - #391's `tests/test_bootstrap_spelling.py` and #490's `tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py` matched ` path: spec` and `tracking_branch: main` in a scaffolded `project.yaml`, and nine cases failed on the merge. They now match the quoted lines. - **The #507 interplay.** `6cbbac60` switches the holder to `family/members` before the real `add`s in `test_a_member_whose_id_yaml_would_misread_is_pinned_under_that_id`, so the test holds once PR #507's `family-on-tracking-branch` refusal lands. - On the clean merge of 6cbbac6 with #507's head 708f3bb, that file, all 13 `tests/test_family*.py` and `tests/test_shape_doctor.py::test_a_sibling_at_the_right_origin_with_another_id_is_not_the_member` give 686 passed, 19 skipped. - Without the switch line, the member test fails `REFUSED family-on-tracking-branch`. - **Targeted runs on 6cbbac6, Linux only:** - the template, adopt-plan and manifest files (14): 995 passed, 2 skipped; - scaffold e2e, setup, the doctor, leg-path collisions and every family file: 1094 passed, 22 skipped; - the 15 further files a grep for template lines found: 1503 passed; - `render-cli-reference.py --check`: ok. - **Re-verified independently** at d651b59 and 6cbbac6: APPROVE WITH NITS (0/0/3), all three in this paragraph and fixed here. The re-verification also ran the three rows, five mutations, and 26 more files (834 passed; 291 passed, 1 skipped). - **Not run locally:** the full suite, macOS and Windows; CI's three jobs are the check. **Composition, as measured on 2026-10-12.** The merge trees below were computed for 233dc71; the follow-up commit 3894aa8 changes only `scripts/family.py` comments and adds tests. At 15:28Z main was 3ae0109 (#245, #351, #350 and #345 had landed since the merge trees): 3894aa8 merges clean with it, and the review's re-verify ran the family tests on that merge (61 passed). Every sha below is the one it had then; main and the other branches have moved since. `git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only`, run after a fetch with automatic maintenance off on 2026-10-12: - **origin/main 161c6c9**, 17 commits past c7c02fa (the base): clean, tree 7ba8246. #316 (34ecbc2), #317, #318, #311 and #245 were on main by then. - **The 46 other remote branch heads** (the 30 open PR heads and 16 branches with no open PR): clean for 44. Among them #314 (4b8da3d), #266 (3410be7), #355 (a03abcf), lane 1's `fix/adopt-plan-quote-yaml-keywords` (d38e143), `fix/adopt-record-submodule-placement` (70f4d29) and `fix/adopt-late-failure-notice` (9f1778d), #380 (73068a3), and `fix/family-init-values` (14e2d68, #307). The two that conflict, each in the same file as it does with c7c02fa and with origin/main on its own: lane 1's `fix/adopt-root-kept-symlinks` (6c44591, `adopt-project.py`) and #358 `fix/doctor-manifest-kinds-unreadable-pin` (ebffb08, `shape-doctor.py`). This branch touches neither file. - #314 and d38e143 each conflicted with origin/main on their own, in `adopt-project.py`. Merged with this branch, neither gained a conflict. **Composition with #314, which lands before this branch.** Its misread gate (`manifest_misreads`) reads the template, so once the template quotes a field it refuses nothing there, and some of #314's tests expected that refusal. Composing with #314 (landed as 3ef059c), whose misread gate asks the template how a value is written. With `project.yaml` quoting `id`, `elected_on`, `visibility` and `tracking_branch`, the gate refuses nothing on the shipped templates, and 45 of #314's tests flipped on the merge. Forty expected a refusal the value no longer needs. Thirty-four of them now assert that the value is accepted, and the six whose premise was a bare placeholder now assert that no shipped template placeholder is misread. For example: a scaffold of `--id null|true|false|007|2026`, or of `--tracking-branch true|True|TRUE|false|False|null|Null|NULL|007|2026|1.5|1.50|0`, exits 0, and the manifest holds the text it was given. A dry run prints the plan. An id derived from `--project True|Null` is held as typed. `--id=null` reaches `gh repo create`. Adopt's `id: "007"` checks clean and `execute` writes it as typed. The rule's own sentence, remediation and line-break wording are still asserted, on a copy of the standard whose `project.yaml` writes the four lines bare. Four stay refused by #314's validator gate, now in its words about the text: `visibility is 'true'` and `elected_on is '20261011'`. One is a real break. `--tracking-branch=~` reads back as `~`, which git refuses as a branch name, and it dies at `git init -b ~`, after `gh repo create`. That is #283, so the row is `xfail(strict=True)` with that reason, and it turns XPASS (and fails) once PR #355's `git check-ref-format --branch` refusal lands. `--help` for `--id` and `--tracking-branch` no longer says such values are refused, and `docs/cli.md` is regenerated. **Composition with the other branches.** Where another branch's rules meet this one, the tests were run on the merged tree. Quoting changes what some of their tests see, and the changes are not all one kind: some tests expected a refusal the value no longer needs, some are still refused under another rule, and some guard a case quoting does not fix. Whoever lands second must tell them apart, so each branch's flips are classified below. - **#266** (lane 2, `fix/leg-path-yaml-scalars`). 27 flips, all from one cause: its rule asks a hard-coded bare line, `LEG_PATH_LINE = "path: {}\n"`, so it refuses leg paths the quoted templates now read back. 15 are `test_the_rule_agrees_with_every_template_line_that_holds_a_leg_path` (null, Null, NULL, ~, true, True, TRUE, false, False, FALSE, 2026, 007, 0, 1.5, 1.50) and 12 are this branch's own end-to-end tests (6 scaffold rows fail with `REFUSED scaffold-bad-leg-path`, 6 adopt rows with `FINDING plan-bad-leg-path`). Counted on the merge with b2b42f8. #266's head was then 3410be7, whose rule reads each template line that holds a leg path, renders the value into it as `render` does and asks the reader, so it has no hard-coded line left. The merge with this branch was clean (tree 1e348c6); that head was read and the 27 were not re-run on it. At b2b42f8, whichever of #266 and #259 landed second had to drop or re-point the bare rule; 3410be7 re-points it already. - **Lane 1's #181** (`fix/adopt-plan-quote-yaml-keywords`, d38e143). Its gate reads the template too, so `plan --tracking-branch 2026|007|true` exits 0 on the composed tree (exit 2 `adopt-manifest-misread` on d38e143). On the merge, `tests/test_adopt_plan_yaml_quoting.py` and this branch's 6 adopt end-to-end tests give 70 failed, 371 passed: - 57 refusals that are now unnecessary: `plan_refuses` ×14, `plan_names_an_id` ×2, `check_names_an_id` ×4, `check_reports` ×14 and `execute_refuses` ×14 (every value except `elected_on` and `visibility`), `text_the_loader_reads_as_other_text` ×7, and the two tests that need a bare placeholder (`test_the_gate_follows_the_loader_when_the_loader_learns_a_keyword`, `test_the_template_line_says_whether_a_value_is_quoted`). - 11 guards #181 loses. See "Do not flip". - 2 that fail only by cascade: `execute_refuses[pins='null']` and `[pins='True']` pass alone (`2 passed`). An earlier case no longer refuses, and its `execute` pushes the split branch. - The writer half of #181 (`y` asking the reader, so `true`/`null`/`True` are quoted in the plan) is still needed and composes cleanly. With it, `plan --tracking-branch true` reaches the quoted template intact, and this branch's two hand-quoted adopt rows become flag-driven. - **Do not flip these 12 to "accepted".** Each still needs a refusal or a finding, and quoting does not supply it: - **`~` (1, #314).** `test_a_value_the_reader_misreads_is_refused_before_anything_is_made[branch-tilde]`. `--tracking-branch=~` is not a branch name git accepts, and #314 refused it only as a misread. On the merge it passes the plan and dies at `git init -q --bare -b ~ .../Atlas-spec.git` with `fatal: invalid initial branch name: '~'`, and against GitHub that is after `gh repo create` has made all three repositories. That is lane 2's #283 (PR #355). `~` must stay refused, by #283's ref-name check, which is why #314's row for it is not flipped to "accepted". - **A hand-edited plan value that is not text (7, #181).** `test_check_names_a_plan_value_that_is_not_text_by_what_was_read[tracking_branch='007']`, `[tracking_branch='TRUE']`, `[tracking_branch='1.50']`, `[tracking_branch='[a]']`, `[visibility='{a: b}']`, `[id='007']` and `[elected_on='20260902']`. The plan's reader reads each as something other than text, and on the merge `check` passes. Measured on the merge: `tracking_branch: 007` and `id: 007` are adopted silently as `"7"` with every validator passing; `visibility: {a: b}` pushes both legs and then fails `manifest-visibility`; `tracking_branch: [a]` is still refused at `execute` (`unsafe-value`) before any leg exists. On d38e143 alone, `check` exits 1 `plan-manifest-misread` for each of those four. Re-point the gate at "a plan value that is not a string" and these keep their guard. - **A quoted value the validator refuses (4, #181).** `test_check_reports_a_plan_carrying_one[elected_on='20260902']` and `[visibility='true']`, and `test_execute_refuses_a_plan_carrying_one_before_any_leg_exists[elected_on='20260902']` and `[visibility='true']`. The value stays invalid for the validator (`DATE_RE`, the visibility choices), and #181's misread gate caught it only incidentally. On the composed tree `check` passes and `execute` pushes the legs, and the gate fails afterwards. That is what main does today, and #314's validator gate (`plan-manifest-invalid`) would catch it. - **main** (merge with ab623dd, tree cdeec7f, run by the review): this branch's new file, `test_adopt_template_values.py` (#270), `test_template_values_single_pass.py` (#316) and `test_template_quoted_values.py` give 431 passed, 1 skipped. The skip is `test_adopt_template_values.py:223`, which reads `git config user.name` and skips where the shared repository's `.git/config` sets one; it is environmental. The changed tests with `test_family_add_refusals.py` (#317, #318), `test_pin_validator.py` and `test_manifest_validator.py` give 132 passed. #270's `unwritable_reason` is value-based, not template-relative, so it refuses as it did and nothing flips. Main then added #245 (`adopt-project.py` and `repo_shape.remote_key`), which adds no test that edits a bare quoted line; it was not run on that merge. - **#380** (lane 3, `fix/pin-rewrite-indentation`; it landed since as 1f90a0f). It rewrites `commit:` and `tree_sha256:` only, and its tests render the pins from the templates. On the merge at dc0fa7b, `test_pin_rewrite_layout.py` and the 6 scaffold end-to-end tests gave 121 passed. Its head was then 73068a3; that merge was clean and was not re-run. - **#397** (`fix/family-init-values`, #307; measured at 14e2d68): its tests skip themselves where the template quotes. 137 passed, 19 skipped, 0 failed. With its fix-round head abb27e6, this branch's 3894aa8, main 0f67f7b and #345 together: 442 passed, 20 skipped (the 19 rows, and one Windows-only row). - **#345** (run at 875d802; it has since landed as 3ae0109): `test_family_dry_run.py` and the member test, 22 passed. Its `" id: irrs"` assertion holds, because ordinary ids stay bare. **Left out.** - The adoption plan writer `y` still writes `true`/`null` bare into the plan. That is #181 (lane 1). - `templates/assembly-root/contracts/neutral-product-pin.yaml` still writes `product`, `source_repository` and `digest_source` bare, and `family.py` writes a member row's `project:` bare. Neither is a #259 field. - A plan value someone edits to a non-text type (`tracking_branch: 007` or `id: 007`, unquoted, in the plan) is read by the plan's reader as the number 7. `str()` makes it `"7"`, and the quoted template now writes it faithfully. For `id` this is a change: on c7c02fa a bare `id: 007` failed loudly (`validate-manifest: manifest-id`, manifest line `id: 7`), and on this branch it is adopted silently as id `"7"` and every validator passes. `tracking_branch: 007` was already adopted silently as `7`. The plan side is not this branch's: the guard against it belongs with #181 (adopt plan writes YAML keywords and non-text values unquoted), whose gate should refuse a plan value that is not a string. The case is narrow, because `plan --id 007` itself writes `id: "007"`; only a hand edit reaches it. - No docs change: README, AGENTS.md, the handbook and the template comments show none of these lines; `docs/cli.md` is unchanged because no `--help` text changed. Reviewed adversarially at 233dc71 (CHANGES NEEDED: 0 blockers, 2 should-fixes, 6 nits; the code and the tests were sound, and the should-fixes were the composition counts and the claim about a hand-edited plan `id`). Fix round 3894aa8 changes no behaviour: it corrects the description and the two false "moves by a byte" claims, and guards `_member_id`'s `except YamlError` with a test of 7 cases. Its re-verification at 3894aa8 found every finding handled: APPROVE WITH NITS (0 blockers, 0 should-fixes, 1 nit: shas that had moved since the description was written, refreshed here). What was added after that re-verification, main and the composition with #314, is described under "Composition with #314". An independent re-verification of that composition at 77cd0b2 confirmed it with nits only (0 blockers, 0 should-fixes, 5 nits): the 45 flips reproduce test for test, breaking the real rule or the real template's quoting turns the compose tests red, and the `[branch-tilde]` row XPASSes on a merge with #355. **Composition with #381.** #395's quoted `id: "{{PROJECT_ID}}"` composes with #381's `member-duplicate-id` test (`tests/test_family_add_member_id.py`), whose id rewrite now matches the id bare or quoted and keeps its quoting, so the full suite, which failed that one test on Linux at 1ef3310, no longer fails `test_a_member_whose_id_changes_between_the_probe_and_the_mount_is_unwound` on Linux. CI is green on Linux, macOS and Windows, with SonarCloud passing, at 4984651 (main cc8f2da merged in by update-branch). Main af01068 (#505), which landed after, touches none of its files, and the combined tree passed the template, hygiene, CLI-reference, AGENTS.md-codes and setup tests (807 passed). Closes #259 Lane: openreposhape-5 (openRepoShape-5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…s a runnable `scripts/family.py`, printed commands quote paths, and `add`, `bump` and `remove` refuse the tracking branch and print their branch's push (#488, #486, #487) (#507) Three defects from lane 3's v1.0.0 acceptance pass of AGENTS.md's "Creating a family, and adding a member", one commit each, in this order, then one review commit for #486 and one for #487. All three change `scripts/family.py` and `add`'s NEXT line, so they are one pull request. **What was wrong.** - AGENTS.md spelled the command `python3 scripts/family.py init --org <org> --family <Name>`, a path that runs from the standard's root. `--into` defaults to where the person stands. - So the command, followed exactly, printed `landing <standard>/Orbit/Orbit` with no word, and `make siblings` would then clone every member into the standard's checkout too. - `init`'s NEXT STEPS printed `python3 family.py add …`, built from `Path(__file__).name`. From the root that fails `can't open file`, exit 2. **What changed** (commit 1). - With neither `--into` nor `--work-dir`, `init` refuses a landing inside a checkout of openRepoShape: `family-landing-in-standard`. A checkout is a directory holding `scripts/family.py` beside `templates/family-root/`, found in the landing's ancestry, so another clone or an install counts too. - The refusal comes before anything is created, under `--dry-run` alike. - The remedy names `--into ..` from the root. From deeper inside the checkout it names the relative path that reaches the checkout's parent. - An explicit `--into` or `--work-dir` is not second-guessed. `family-holder-already-here` is still asked first. - NEXT STEPS, and the `family-holder-already-here` remedy, name this file relative to the directory `init` ran in. From the root that is `scripts/family.py`, as setup-project.py, validate-family.py, AGENTS.md and README spell it. It is absolute where no relative path exists. - AGENTS.md's init command passes `--into ..`, as README's already does, and step 1 says why. The edit is line-neutral: step 1 is one line shorter. - `init --into --help` says it too, and docs/cli.md is regenerated. **How tested.** `tests/test_family_init_landing.py`, 9 tests: - the old command from the root is refused, as a dry run, so nothing can land in the checkout; - a real run inside a fake checkout creates nothing; - the remedy from a subdirectory names the right parent; - an explicit `--into .` or `--work-dir .` passes; - outside a checkout the default is unchanged; - AGENTS.md's line, as written, lands beside the checkout; - the printed NEXT runs, both from the root and from elsewhere. On origin/main code 6 of them fail. Removing the refusal turns 3 red, and putting `Path(__file__).name` back turns 2 red. **What was wrong.** `family.py` and the holder's `siblings.py` printed every path in their pasteable commands bare. Under a holder at `…/my work/Sonata/Sonata`: - the `member-git-dir-cached` remedy `rm -rf <store>` split into `rm -rf …/my`, an absolute directory that is NOT the store, and a relative `work/…`; - `init`'s NEXT STEPS and `add`'s NEXT split `--family-root` and `git -C` (`fatal: cannot change to '…/my'`, exit 128); - the `mv` lines for a misnamed family folder pasted as four arguments. **What changed** (commit 2, and the review commit after #487's). - `scripts/repo_shape.py` gains `shell_quoted(value, platform=None)` and `shell_line(words, platform=None)`, in a new section at its end, the library `family.py` already imports. - It is the doctor's `quote_arg` rule (#101/#102): the same two alphabets, and the same two escapes, `sh`'s `'\''` and PowerShell's doubled apostrophe. The dialect comes from `os.name` or a `platform` argument. An ordinary word is left bare. - It does not flatten to ASCII, as the doctor's report does by contract. A command that deletes or moves a directory has to name that directory. So PowerShell's typographic single quotes are doubled too. - A word that begins with `=` is quoted, in both dialects. zsh, macOS's login shell, expands a bare `=word` to a command's path (`=ls` reaches the command as `/bin/ls`). This is the one place it differs from the doctor's rule on ASCII. - `family.py`: - `init`'s NEXT STEPS print the `add` on ONE line. It used to paste only into a POSIX shell, because of its `\` continuation. `cd <holder>` and `make siblings` are two lines, with no `&&`, which Windows PowerShell 5.1 rejects between two statements. - Those lines and the `family-holder-already-here` remedy quote every path. - `add`'s NEXT quotes `git -C <holder>`, and `member-path-taken` quotes each spelling it names. - `member-git-dir-cached`, and `remove`'s note about the same store, print the directory alone on its own line. Then comes `rm -rf` with its one argument quoted for the POSIX shell `rm -rf` belongs to, and the sentence names that shell: Git Bash on Windows. PowerShell refuses `-rf` and deletes nothing. - `siblings.py`: the parent-folder warning's `mv` and `mkdir -p` lines are quoted for a POSIX shell with the standard library's `shlex.join`, and the warning says which shell. It does NOT import the new quoter: a holder that kept its own `repo_shape.py` through `update-shape.py apply --accept-local` takes the new `siblings.py` without it, and an import of a name its copy lacks stopped `make siblings`, `park` and `resume` with an ImportError that `check` and the validator never reported. - `setup-project.py`'s family hand-over quotes the holder in its `add` line (and names the branch first, see #487). It runs before any checkout of the standard exists, so it carries its own copy of the rule, and a test holds that copy to `shell_quoted`. **How tested.** `tests/test_family_printed_quoting.py`, 69 tests: - The quoter round-trips through `shlex.split`, and through a PowerShell reader, for a space and an apostrophe, `é` and a typographic apostrophe, shell syntax, the empty string, and every printable ASCII character alone and before, inside and after a word. - The host's own `sh`, `bash` and `zsh` hand each quoted word back byte for byte through `printf`, a leading `=` among them (skipped where a shell is absent, and on Windows). - It agrees with the doctor's `quote_arg` on every one of those ASCII values but a leading `=`, and its two alphabets are the doctor's two patterns. - Under a holder in `my work` and in `Dana's work`, each of these splits into the argv it means: `init`'s NEXT (with `cd` and `make siblings` on their own lines), `add`'s NEXT, the cached-store remedy and note, the `mv` lines, and setup-project's `switch` and `add`. - The `rm -rf`, run as split, deletes the store, and the decoy `<tmp>/my` survives. - The `mv` lines, run as split, move the holder. - The holder's own `siblings.py` runs `--help`, the misnamed-folder warning and `--make park` beside a `repo_shape.py` that lacks every name this change added. - Three existing tests' expected lines follow the new wording. Mutations, each turning tests red: - a bare quoter: 35 red; - bare `mv` lines in `siblings.py`: 3 red; - a bare `rm -rf`, a bare `add` NEXT, a bare `init` `add` (round 1, on the 85-test file): 2 red each; - `siblings.py` importing `shell_line` again: 1 red (the older-`repo_shape.py` test); - `%` dropped from the POSIX alphabet: 2 red (the every-ASCII agreement and the alphabet test). The round-1 sample test passed it, 36 of 36; - a leading `=` left bare: 10 red, among them the real-`zsh` test; - `cd … && make siblings` back on one line: 2 red; - setup-project's holder unquoted: 2 red. **What was wrong.** - AGENTS.md says each act's ONE commit lands as a pull request, and no step made the branch that pull request needs. - After `init` the holder stands on `main`, and all three acts committed straight onto it. - `add` printed `NEXT git -C <holder> push -u origin <branch> && open a pull request`. No branch is called `<branch>`, so the push failed: `src refspec … does not match any`. - `bump` and `remove` printed no NEXT at all. - `bump-leg.py` refuses exactly this for a leg (`bump-leg-on-tracking-branch`). **What changed** (commit 3, and the review commit after it). - The real run of each act refuses the holder's tracking branch, the one `family.yaml` declares (`family-on-tracking-branch`), and a HEAD on no branch (`family-holder-detached`, which is what `bump-leg.py`'s `bump-leg-root-detached` refuses too). - The check comes after the refusals about the arguments and the holder, and before the member is read, fetched or cloned, and before anything is written. - The remedy is a quoted `git -C <holder> switch -c <branch>`. The branch is `family/add-<project>`, `family/bump-<id>-<sha12>` or `family/remove-<id>`, and a name that is not a plain branch word becomes `member`. - `--dry-run` runs on any branch. On a work branch it prints where the commit would land. On the tracking branch it prints that the real run refuses there, with the refusal's code, and the `switch` command on a line of its own. The module's EXIT CODES paragraph names this as the one refusal a dry run does not make. - Each act that commits ends with ONE pasteable line: `NEXT git -C <holder> push -u origin <the branch it committed on>`, quoted, then `then open a pull request against <tracking>; never push to it directly`. `bump` and `remove` gain that NEXT. - `init`'s NEXT STEPS open with the `switch` before the `add`. - `add`, `bump` and `remove` `--help` say the branch rule, and that each ends by PRINTING the push; docs/cli.md is regenerated. - AGENTS.md's family block gains the `switch` step before the `add`, and step 3 says the tracking branch is refused, as `family-on-tracking-branch`, and that the branch is pushed as its NEXT line says. README's InkRouter block gains the same step, and its paragraph says it. Both edits are line-neutral: AGENTS.md tightens steps 2 and 5, and README tightens the `make bootstrap` paragraph. `docs/handbook.html` mirrors the block and the sentence, and its footer names #487 and the new README blob. - The holder's own docs, `templates/family-root/AGENTS-shape.md` and `templates/family-root/README.md`, open their add/bump/remove block with the `switch` and say the act refuses the tracking branch. `setup-project.py`'s family hand-over prints the `switch` before its `add`. - Test fixtures that committed on `main` now commit on a branch: - `tests/test_family.py`'s module fixture grows the family on `family/members` and pushes that branch to the remote's `main`, as the merged pull request would leave it; - `test_shape_doctor.py`'s holder fixture and `test_family_add_excludes.py`'s `empty_holder` switch to a branch; - `test_family_add_refusals.py` changes in four places: the `NEXT` expectation, `unborn_holder`, the empty-family test, and the corrupt-HEAD test. In that last test, the tag state's branch check is answered in-process, because the test is about the rollback's reading of HEAD. **How tested.** `tests/test_family_tracking_branch.py`, 17 tests: - For each act, on `main`: refused, with the holder byte for byte as it was, and for `add` nothing cloned. Then the printed `switch`, run as split, makes the branch; the act goes through on it; and its printed NEXT, run as split, pushes the branch, which the remote then holds at the act's commit. - A detached HEAD is refused. - Dry runs on `main` and on a branch say what they should. - A family made with `--tracking-branch trunk` refuses `add` on `trunk`; on a branch named `main` the dry run says the commit lands there for a pull request against `trunk`, the real run commits, and its NEXT pushes `main`. - The suggested names pass `git check-ref-format --branch`. - `init`'s NEXT STEPS open with the `switch`. - AGENTS.md, README.md and the holder's two docs show the `switch` in the same block as, and before, the first `add`. Mutations, each turning tests red: the branch check letting `main` through, 4 red; the NEXT line naming `<branch>` again, 3 red; `init`'s NEXT STEPS without the `switch`, 1 red; the tracking branch hard-coded to `"main"`, 1 red (the `trunk` test; every family test passed it before); the holder docs without the `switch`, 2 red; setup-project without the `switch`, 2 red. An independent review at 10c93de gave CHANGES NEEDED (0 blockers, 1 should-fix, 6 nits). The should-fix was a holder that kept an older `scripts/repo_shape.py` through `apply --accept-local`: its new `siblings.py` could not import the shared quoter, so `make siblings`, `park` and `resume` died. The round at bb11b63 fixes it and all six nits, as described above. Re-verified at bb11b63: APPROVE WITH NITS (0 blockers, 0 should-fixes, 3 nits), with SonarCloud's quality gate OK and 0.0% new duplication. The nits were the holder README's pointer to the push (now "as its `NEXT` line says"), two Sonar smells (S1192: `refs/heads/` is now `HEADS_PREFIX`; S3415: the two expected-first assertions now put the actual value first, as the file's other 32 do), and this description's list of other pull requests. All three are fixed at 3451a56: commit 11ae0a8, then a clean merge of main 994be39. The family set gave 566 passed, 8 skipped there. GitHub's update-branch then merged main cac6bb2 as 8e1471c, and main aa4e1f5 (#508, after #490, #474 and #468) was merged as 708f3bb. There only the `docs/handbook.html` footer conflicted: it takes main's clauses, #468's (#424) included, with the README blob recomputed, and `docs/cli.md` auto-merged and passes `--check`. Main 47b1e06 (#505 and #395, after #376, #374, #384, #495, #493 and #491) was then merged as fcbc7a2, again with only the footer in conflict: main's clauses stay in main's order, this branch's (#487) moves to the end, after (#483), and the README blob is recomputed. Every run used `/usr/bin/python3 -m pytest -q -p no:cacheprovider`, with a stub `gh` first on PATH, a bogus `GH_TOKEN`, an empty `GH_CONFIG_DIR` and git's identity blanked. Run on Linux. At e42ef74 (main d41cc29, #402, merged in by GitHub's update-branch), on its tree 655c927: the first set listed below for fcbc7a2, plus every `tests/test_update_shape*.py`, gave **1242 passed, 22 skipped**; the second set, plus `tests/test_leg_path_yaml_scalars.py`, `tests/test_ruleset_hint_tracking_branch.py`, `tests/test_scaffold_reuse_seeded_legs.py`, `tests/test_scaffold_pin_and_reuse.py` and `tests/test_doctor_validator_rows.py`, gave **1260 passed, 12 skipped**. The skips are the same as at 5a2776d, below. At 654df49 (main 8cd7dbe merged in, with #506 and #347): the first set listed below for fcbc7a2, plus every `tests/test_update_shape*.py`, gave **1242 passed, 22 skipped**; the second set, plus `tests/test_leg_path_yaml_scalars.py`, `tests/test_ruleset_hint_tracking_branch.py`, `tests/test_scaffold_reuse_seeded_legs.py` and `tests/test_scaffold_pin_and_reuse.py`, gave **1231 passed, 12 skipped**. The skips are the same as at 5a2776d, below. At 5a2776d (main f391e58 merged in, with #266, #509, #496 and #435): the first set listed below for fcbc7a2, plus every `tests/test_update_shape*.py`, gave **1213 passed, 22 skipped** (the template-quoting skips below, and three NTFS-junction cases, Windows only); the second set, plus `tests/test_leg_path_yaml_scalars.py`, gave **1171 passed, 12 skipped** (the four Windows-only skips below, and eight in that file, main's new one, whose cases the quoted templates (#259) leave with nothing to refuse). At 22733ce (main 631f087, #503, merged in by GitHub's update-branch): the first set listed below for fcbc7a2, plus every `tests/test_update_shape*.py`, gave **1213 passed, 22 skipped** (the template-quoting skips below, and three NTFS-junction cases, Windows only); the second set gave **944 passed, 4 skipped**. At fcbc7a2 (origin/main 47b1e06 merged in, with #505 and #395): - every `tests/test_family*.py`, `tests/test_validate_family*.py`, `tests/test_park_resume_targets.py`, `tests/test_free_plan_hint.py` and `tests/test_template_text_placeholders.py`: **844 passed, 19 skipped** (`tests/test_family_init_values.py:219` and `:291`, which skip because the template now quotes the placeholder and `id:`). - `tests/test_repo_hygiene.py tests/test_agents_md_codes.py tests/test_cli_reference.py tests/test_shape_doctor.py tests/test_setup_project_py.py tests/test_setup_sh.py tests/test_template_quoted_values.py tests/test_stdout_encoding.py tests/test_windows_paths.py tests/test_commit_trailers.py`: **944 passed, 4 skipped** (the doctor's PowerShell line and `tests/test_stdout_encoding.py:286`, Windows only). At 708f3bb (origin/main aa4e1f5 merged in): - every `tests/test_family*.py`, `tests/test_validate_family*.py`, `tests/test_park_resume_targets.py` and `tests/test_free_plan_hint.py`: **718 passed, 8 skipped** (`tests/test_family_init_values.py:242`). - `tests/test_repo_hygiene.py tests/test_agents_md_codes.py tests/test_cli_reference.py tests/test_shape_doctor.py tests/test_update_shape_landing.py tests/test_doctor_unfinished_merge.py tests/test_template_values_single_pass.py tests/test_stdout_encoding.py tests/test_windows_paths.py`: **813 passed, 4 skipped** (the doctor's PowerShell line and `tests/test_stdout_encoding.py:286`, Windows only). Earlier, with origin/main 48585e6 merged in: - `tests/test_family*.py tests/test_validate_family*.py tests/test_stdout_encoding.py tests/test_windows_paths.py tests/test_repo_hygiene.py tests/test_agents_md_codes.py tests/test_cli_reference.py tests/test_park_resume_targets.py tests/test_bootstrap_spelling.py tests/test_free_plan_hint.py tests/test_template_values_single_pass.py`: **1303 passed, 9 skipped**. - `tests/test_shape_doctor.py tests/test_update_shape*.py tests/test_commit_trailers.py tests/test_tracking_branch_ref.py tests/test_scaffold_ignored_shape_files.py tests/test_ruleset_hint_tracking_branch.py tests/test_bump_leg_dry_run_tracking.py tests/test_setup_project_py.py`: **999 passed, 6 skipped**. - The new files alone: `test_family_init_landing.py` 9, `test_family_printed_quoting.py` 69, `test_family_tracking_branch.py` 17, all passed. The full suite was not run locally. CI's three jobs are the check. #505 and #395 have since landed, and both are merged here at fcbc7a2. Each of #505's family sentences was read against this branch's code, and none is false: AGENTS.md 3 and 233; README 569, 822, 1152, 1269 and 1348; the handbook 1126 and 1506. #395 landed with its test switching to `family/members` before its real `add`, as the last bullet below says, and the first run above includes it. #503 then landed as 631f087, and GitHub's update-branch merged it here as 22733ce with no conflict. Main f391e58 (#266, #509, #496 and #435) was then merged by hand as 5a2776d, again with only the footer in conflict: main's clauses stay in main's order, this branch's (#487) moves after #509's (#498), and the README blob is recomputed; `git show --remerge-diff` shows nothing else. #509's reworded sentences in AGENTS.md, README.md and the handbook were read beside this branch's, and none contradicts or repeats another. Its `setup-project.py` changes (the clone-path check, the plan line, the step-(7) backstop and `_main`) and this branch's `shell_word` lines in the hand-over do not meet, and `docs/cli.md` passes `--check`. Main 8cd7dbe (#506 and #347) was then merged by hand as 654df49, again with only the footer in conflict: this branch's (#487) moves after #506's (#462), the README blob is recomputed, and `docs/cli.md`, which both sides changed, still passes `--check`. #506's two `scripts/family.py` hunks (the `FAMILY_RULESET_HINT` import, and its print when the holder's push is refused) sit unchanged inside this branch's code, and that hint prints no path. Under `--reuse-empty-repo`, `init` still refuses its default `--into` inside a checkout of this standard (`family-landing-in-standard`) before it reads the remote, as a dry run with a stub `gh` showed. #506's sentences in AGENTS.md, README.md and the handbook are still true beside this branch's. Main d41cc29 (#402, for #277), which rewrote the doctor's NEXT lines and `tests/test_shape_doctor.py`, was then merged by GitHub's update-branch as e42ef74, with no conflict; the `holder` fixture still switches to `family/members` before its `add`. AGENTS.md stays at 490 lines and README.md at 1422. `git merge-tree --write-tree` of 708f3bb, at 04:47Z on 2026-10-13: - **Clean:** #503 (`fix/family-makefile-without-siblings`) and #395. Each merged tree keeps AGENTS.md at 490 lines and README.md at 1422. - **`docs/handbook.html` footer only:** #505 (`docs/v1-accuracy`) and #491. #468 has landed and is merged here. #506 conflicts there too, and in `scaffold-project.py`, as it does with main. README.md and AGENTS.md merge clean with #505, and `setup-project.py` merges clean with #491. Whichever lands second keeps every footer clause and recomputes the README blob. - **#395 merges clean but one of its tests fails with this branch.** `tests/test_template_text_placeholders.py::test_a_member_whose_id_yaml_would_misread_is_pinned_under_that_id` inits its own holder and runs a real `add` on `main`, which #487 refuses with `family-on-tracking-branch`. Whichever of the two lands second adds `git("switch", "-q", "-c", "family/members", cwd=root)` after that test's `init`; lane 5 is adding it on #395's own branch now, so this branch needs no change for it. (#395's head d526f76 also conflicts with this head in `tests/test_adopt_manifest_values.py`, a file this branch does not touch: that is #395 against main, which the same round resolves.) - On Windows `shell_quoted` speaks PowerShell, the native shell this standard documents (`setup-project.py`), as the doctor's NEXT lines do. `git -C …`, `python scripts\family.py …` and `cd …` are shell-agnostic, so they get the platform's quoting, and no printed line joins two commands with `&&`, which Windows PowerShell 5.1 rejects. - `rm -rf`, `mv` and `mkdir -p` are POSIX commands. They are quoted for a POSIX shell on every host, and the text says "in a POSIX shell (Git Bash on Windows)". PowerShell refuses `rm -rf`'s `-rf` and deletes nothing. - The tests split a host-quoted line with a PowerShell reader on Windows and with `shlex` elsewhere, and split a POSIX-only line with `shlex` everywhere. The real-shell test is skipped on Windows. - On Windows the tests do not execute `rm` or the `mv` lines. They delete the split path with `shutil.rmtree`, and stop after checking the `mv` argv. - Paths: the cached store keeps git's POSIX spelling (`as_posix`), as before. Test paths are `resolve()`d, which expands an 8.3 short name such as `RUNNER~1`. - Nothing here was run on Windows or macOS locally. The `tests-windows` and `tests-macos` CI jobs are the check; on macOS the real-shell test runs the shipped `zsh`. - **A shipped template that imports a newer shared helper can break a holder that kept an older copy.** This change no longer does (`siblings.py` uses `shlex.join`), but nothing stops the next one: `update-shape.py apply --accept-local scripts/repo_shape.py` keeps a `repo_shape.py` that lacks a name a newly copied file imports, and `check` and the validator then read the holder as fine. The general guard is for `apply` to refuse that, as rv456 found for `bootstrap.py` and `spelled` (#456). - **The doctor's `quote_arg` leaves a word that begins with `=` bare**, which zsh expands. `shell_quoted` quotes it; the doctor is left as it is here, and the agreement test excludes that one case. - **The doctor and `update-shape.py` keep their own quoters.** The doctor's `quote_arg` flattens to ASCII by its report's contract, so moving it onto `repo_shape.shell_quoted` is more than an import change. `update-shape.py`'s POSIX `shlex` lines are lane 3's open #374. A test holds `shell_quoted` and `quote_arg` to one answer on every printable ASCII value but a leading `=`. - **`family.py`'s by-hand rollback commands (#365) and its `git config -f .gitmodules` removals (#317, #360) keep `shlex.quote`.** They were already quoted, they are POSIX-only (`printf … | git update-index`), and they are worded for a POSIX shell. - **The holder's `validate-family.py` remedies that name `family.py add`** (`member-gitlink-absent`, `member-gitlink-unnamed`) print no branch step: they are a holder copy, and the `add` they name refuses the tracking branch with its own `switch` remedy. - **`remove`'s store note still computes `.git/modules/<path>`** rather than asking `git rev-parse --git-path`, as `add` does. In a linked worktree it therefore prints no note. That predates this change. - **PowerShell verbs** (`Remove-Item`, `Move-Item`) are not printed for the POSIX-only commands. - **README's `--into` sentence gives the default but not the refusal.** README.md (861) and the handbook (1246) say `--into <dir>` is the PARENT directory, "the directory you are standing in, by default". They do not say that `init` refuses that default inside a checkout of this standard (`family-landing-in-standard`). AGENTS.md item 1 says so, and the README's own example passes `--into ..`. README.md is at its 1422-line cap, so the sentence is on #459's checklist. - **`setup-project.py`'s own `cd <clone>` line and its step-(7) backstop lines print their paths unquoted.** This change quotes only the family lines it prints. Those two predate it and #509, and they are on #459's checklist. Reviewed independently at 10c93de: CHANGES NEEDED (0 blockers, 1 should-fix, 6 nits). The round at bb11b63 fixed the should-fix and all six nits, and its re-verification gave APPROVE WITH NITS (0/0/3), with SonarCloud's quality gate OK; those three are fixed at 3451a56. Main was then merged by GitHub's update-branch (8e1471c), by hand at 708f3bb and at fcbc7a2, where each time only the handbook footer conflicted, and by update-branch again at 22733ce (main 631f087, #503), with no conflict. CI was green there on Linux, macOS and Windows, with SonarCloud passing, but main had moved on: main f391e58 (#266, #509, #496 and #435) was merged by hand at 5a2776d, where again only the footer conflicted. CI was green there too, but main moved on again: main 8cd7dbe (#506 and #347) was merged by hand at 654df49, where once more only the footer conflicted. CI was green there as well, and main d41cc29 (#402) then came in by update-branch at e42ef74, with no conflict. CI is green on Linux and macOS, with SonarCloud passing, at e42ef74, a clean merge of main. All three OSes and SonarCloud passed at 654df49, and under Brett Heap's landing rule of 22:08:06Z (ruling 27) macOS and Windows carry over from that head. Main e6fbd74 (#515, for #514), which landed after it, touches none of its files, and the combined tree passed `tests/test_adopt_pins.py`, `tests/test_shape_doctor.py`, `tests/test_scaffold_leg_path_collisions.py`, the hygiene, AGENTS-code and CLI-reference tests, `tests/test_family_printed_quoting.py` and `tests/test_family_tracking_branch.py` (777 passed, 3 skipped). Closes #488 Closes #486 Closes #487 Lane: openreposhape-5 (openRepoShape-5) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ommit it would move, and sends a mount with no `.git` of its own, an unborn HEAD, a mount git finds no url for, and a leg with its own lockstep fact to a line that cures it or to none (#413, #414) (#559) #413: the keep sentence ("A commit made in a leg on no branch is left only in its reflog by this line. To keep one, run first ...") was printed only for a populated mount detached off its pin, and the line moves three more HEADs that can hold the only copy of a commit. (a) A mount emptied by `git submodule deinit -f` keeps its repository, and the update checks the gitlink out over that repository's HEAD: the row finds it by the submodule's name and `git rev-parse --git-path modules/<name>`, reads its HEAD through `--git-dir`, and names a commit detached off the gitlink with `git --git-dir=<repository> branch NAME <commit>`, plus a `--work-tree` where the mount directory is gone too. (b) The holder's own `scripts/bootstrap.py` updates every member, and its `why` carries the same keep sentence, built by the same function (`checkout_notes`), for every member it would move off a detached commit, the ones the row hands to the family gate included. (c) `--recursive` checks out the submodules a mount carries of its own: each member's legs, and anything a leg mounts. A line that names a mount carrying some says so in general words, with `git -C LEG branch NAME` for a member's leg, or `git -C LEG/SUB branch NAME` for a leg's own submodule, to run first. #414: (1) no HEAD is read in a mount with no `.git` of its own, where git walked up and the row quoted the root's; it goes to the git line when git kept its repository, which the update links again, and to the lockstep gate when it did not, and the `why` says which. (2) An unborn HEAD and (3) a mount git finds no url for get no NEXT and a `why` naming the state, instead of a gate that says `pins ok` or a line that exits 128; the gate names no `.gitmodules` entry (measured). A mount has no url when no `.gitmodules` section gives its path, read as git reads that file, or when its section has no url and `git config --get submodule.<name>.url` in the root finds none either: `--init` reads the url `submodule init` copied there first, so the line still cures a mount that is only missing the `url` key. In a holder, such a member takes the holder's own bootstrap off the line, because git stops its pathless update at that member. Where the lockstep gate is the NEXT, an unborn HEAD or a mount with no url beside it is named in the gate's `why`. (4) "Run the doctor again" is asked per leg too. The `members` row routes through the same function, `checkout_reach`. The two #533 docstrings, `submodule_update_next` and `check_legs`, and the test file's own, said bootstrap never moves an existing branch whose tip is not the pin; since #475 and #490 it moves one where that loses nothing, and they say so. `checkout_notes` and `submodule_update_next` no longer hold the sentence to the old ` # ` tail's quoting rule, since #277 made it the row's `why`, on a line of its own. Folded from its verification: in a holder, every member with a gitlink that git finds no url for, whether the row routes it or not, takes the holder's own bootstrap off the line, and the `why` names each one, so a person knows which entry to restore; the url question is one helper, `submodule_url`, asked the same way by every caller. A commit in a submodule whose directory went with an emptied mount is kept by a line spelled through its repository, `git --git-dir=REPO/modules/SUB --work-tree=ROOT branch NAME HEAD`, and a leg whose own working tree dropped its submodule is asked for its repository's `modules/` too. The `.gitmodules` listing is read by a pure, unit-tested helper, `section_url`. Closes #413 Closes #414 Lane: openreposhape-4 (openRepoShape-4) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>



Lane: openreposhape-3 (openRepoShape-3)
Claim: #475 (comment)
What
templates/assembly-root/scripts/bootstrap.py, step (a). Before it refuses a tracking branch whose tip is not the pin,checkout_tracking_branchnow runsgit merge-base --is-ancestor <tip> <pin>. A branch that is behind goes to the newfast_forward_to_pin:HEAD detached at the pin, as
bump-leg.pyandgit submodule updateleave it:git branch -f <branch> <pin>, thengit checkout <branch>. The leg ends on its tracking branch AT the new pin, and bootstrap printsbranch main fast-forwarded <old> -> <new>, the pin.HEAD on the tracking branch, behind the pin:
git -c merge.autostash=false merge --ff-only <pin>. The working tree moves with it.merge.autostashis off for this one merge (fix round, review finding 1 and codex's P1). Withmerge.autostash=truein a person's config, git stashed a local edit to a file the move changes, fast-forwarded, applied the stash back into conflicts and exited 0. Bootstrap then printedfast-forwardedover an unmerged leg holding anautostashentry. Now that edit is refused the same way it is without the setting.-c, not--no-autostash: a git before 2.27 rejects that as an unknown option, and has no autostash to turn off.Not
checkout -B. Measured on git 2.43:git checkout -B main <pin>resetsmaineven while another worktree of the leg has it checked out. That leaves the other worktree's files behind its own HEAD.git branch -frefuses in that case.Any other checkout stays where it is. A commit made on the detached leg after the bump is exactly the commit the issue says gets lost, and checking the branch out would leave it only in the reflog. A leg on another branch is somebody's work. Bootstrap prints
... and the checkout is at <sha> (detached), which is neitherand says what to do.When git refuses a move (an untracked file or a changed tracked file in the way, or the branch held by another worktree), bootstrap prints git's own lines under
... and git refused to move it:and tries nothing else. The exit code stays 0, as for every step (a) line. Fix round, review finding 2: whenbranch -fworked and thecheckoutwas refused (a staleindex.lock), the line now saysbranch main moved <old> -> <new>, the pin, and git refused to check it out:. Blank lines in git's message are no longer printed as a line of spaces.A fresh clone whose leg's remote has moved past the pin (fix round, the coordinator extended this PR to the review's "out of scope" gap).
git clone --recurse-submodulesmakes each leg'smainat the remote's tip and leaves the leg detached at the pin. Bootstrap then met amainahead of the pin and left the leg detached undernot moving an existing branch. That is bump-leg.py, thenmake bootstrap, leaves the leg detached: bootstrap never fast-forwards a local tracking branch that is behind the new pin, though AGENTS.md, README and bump-leg.py say it re-places it #475's harm on the onboarding flow AGENTS.md section 3 describes. Bootstrap now moves the branch back to the pin, withbranch -fthencheckout, only when all three hold:refs/remotes/origin/main), compared by object id;It prints one line:
branch main moved back <tip> -> <pin>, the pin; nothing is lost, origin/main still holds those commits, and `git -C spec merge --ff-only origin/main` brings the branch forward. Second fix round, verification finding 5: the leg path and the upstream in that command are shell-quoted withshlex.quote, then spelled, asscripts/family.pyquotes the commands it prints. An ordinary path prints as before;my specprints as'my spec'. The olderNOT INITIALIZEDline is a different line and is unchanged.Every checkout of an existing branch is judged by where HEAD is afterwards, not by git's exit code (second fix round, verification finding 1 = codex's P2, and finding 3). The new
_check_outrunsgit checkout <branch>through_git_says, then reads_head_of.on main at <pin>was printed anyway. With a staleindex.lockthe leg stayed detached; with a local edit in the way it stayed on another branch. That is on main too, and this PR opened a new way into it: a branchbranch -fmoved to the pin, whose checkout git refused, is at the pin on the next run. The newplace_at_pinnow printsbranch main is at the pin <pin>, and git refused to check it out:with git's lines, and the leg stays where it is.checked out, and then git said:.Every other branch holding a commit the pin lacks is never moved. Its two lines,
PIN ... != branch ... tip ...andnot moving an existing branch. ..., are byte-identical to main's. That covers: ahead with a commit of its own, diverged, no upstream, an upstream that is a local branch, an upstream whose remote-tracking ref is missing, HEAD on the branch, and amainthat does not contain the pin.Every new line spells the branch names, the upstream, the leg path and git's lines with
spelled, as templates/assembly-root/scripts/bootstrap.py and templates/family-root/scripts/bootstrap.py:mainprints the manifest'snamewith a plainprintbefore any step runs, soname: "a\ud83db"(a lone surrogate) endsmake bootstrapin aUnicodeEncodeErrortraceback, exit 1 (make: 2), and the validator that names the problem is never reached; a valid name the stdout cannot encode ends the same way #391 (landed in Both roots' scripts/bootstrap.py:mainescapes what stdout cannot encode and spells each value it prints, soname: "a\ud83db"or日本underPYTHONIOENCODING=asciino longer endsmake bootstrapin a traceback (#391) #456) requires for every value bootstrap prints.Unchanged: a leg with no local branch (created at the pin), a branch whose tip is the pin and which git checks out, the pin itself, and steps (b) to (d).
The digest moves.
scripts/bootstrap.pyis a pinned shape copy. Its sha256 moves from3c18fa84…(main) toc5a45458…(head 757a440; e5d7a3a hadde536646…, b247dec03db7ca7…).update-shape.py checkwill report the file asupstream-changedin every project. No test pins that digest (no 64-hex string anywhere intests/), so no test expectation moved.Families: nothing to change.
templates/family-root/scripts/bootstrap.pyhas no branch logic. It runsgit submodule update --init --recursive, then each member's ownmake bootstrap, which is this file in that member. So a member gets this fix once its own copy is updated.The issue was right on every point. Re-measured, it holds on current main, and with
--tracking-branch trunktoo. The review found the same harm on a fresh clone, which this PR now covers as well.Why
First round. Measured with a Python driver (no bash). It scaffolds Atlas into local bare remotes, clones recursively, bootstraps, pushes a new spec-leg commit, runs
bump-leg.pyfrom abump/specbranch of the root, then bootstraps again. A refusingghstub is first on PATH, withGH_TOKEN=bogusand an emptyGH_CONFIG_DIR. Main was measured at 8782333, just before #456 landed; #456 changed only how step (a) spells its values, not what it moves. Head was e5d7a3a, on ec4a7a0.In every case, bump-leg exits 0 and both bootstraps exit 0 on both sides. What differs is the
[spec]line and where the leg ends:[spec]line / where the leg ends[spec]line / where the leg endsmain(the issue)PIN <new> != branch main tip <old>+not moving an existing branch. .../ DETACHED at<new>,mainat<old>branch main fast-forwarded <old> -> <new>, the pin/ onmainat<new>--tracking-branch trunktrunk/ DETACHED at<new>branch trunk fast-forwarded <old> -> <new>, the pin/ ontrunkat<new>mainat the old pinmainat<old>(the root records<new>)branch main fast-forwarded .../ onmainat<new>, worktree cleanmain, pin unchangedPIN <pin> != branch main tip <local>+not moving .../mainat<local>main, then bumpedPIN <new> != branch main tip <local>+not moving .../mainat<local>, leg detached at<new>The checkout stays at the pin/ detached at<made>branch main tip <old> is behind the PIN <new>, and the checkout is at <made> (detached), which is neither+not moving the checkout off it. .../ detached at<made>,mainat<old>main, an untrackedNEW-CONTRACT.mdin the waymainat<old>... and git refused to move it:, git's four lines, thennothing else is tried; .../mainat<old>, the file keptFirst fix round. Measured with the review's probe, extended: the same leg state is run through main 7a8b981's bootstrap.py, the first commit e5d7a3a's, and head b247dec's, with
--skip-validators, under the sameghstub. Every run exits 0. The fresh-clone rows use a second scaffold whose spec remote'smainis one commit (<tip>) past the pin.mainbehind the pin, a local edit toREADME.md, which the pin also changes, withmerge.autostash=truebranch main fast-forwarded <old> -> <new>, the pin; ..., and the leg is leftUU README.md,unmerged: README.md,stash@{0}: autostash... and git refused to move it:, git's four lines (Your local changes ... would be overwritten by merge) /mainat<old>,M README.md, no stash, nothing unmergedmerge.autostashmainat<old>, a staleindex.lockin the legbranch main tip <old> is behind the PIN <new>, and git refused to move it:, git's lines with a line of ten spaces among them /mainat<new>, detachedbranch main moved <old> -> <new>, the pin, and git refused to check it out:, git's lines, no blank one /mainat<new>, detached. Once the lock is gone, the next run checksmainout; while it stays, the next run says so again (second fix round, below)mainpast the pinPIN <pin> != branch main tip <tip>+not moving an existing branch. .../ DETACHED at<pin>,mainat<tip>branch main moved back <tip> -> <pin>, the pin; nothing is lost, origin/main still holds those commits, and `git -C spec merge --ff-only origin/main` brings the branch forward/ onmainat<pin>,origin/mainat<tip>, upstream stillorigin/main, root cleanREADME.mdmainat<pin>, the edit kept (M README.md)mainwith a commit of its own; no upstream; an upstream that is a local branch; the remote-tracking ref deleted; HEAD onmainmainchecked out in another worktree of the legbranch main tip <tip> is ahead of the PIN <pin> with no commit origin/main lacks, and git refused to move it back:+fatal: cannot force update the branch 'main' used by worktree at '<path>'/ nothing movesindex.lockbranch main moved back <tip> -> <pin>, the pin (origin/main still holds <tip>), and git refused to check it out:+ git's lines /mainat<pin>, detached. Once the lock is gone, the next run checks it out; while it stays, the next run says so again (second fix round, below)The review's 18 first-round scenarios were re-run through e5d7a3a and b247dec. Output and the state left are byte-identical in 16 of them. The other two are the autostash and
index.lockrows above.Second fix round. Measured with the verification's probe: 30 scenarios, each on its own fresh recursive clone of one scaffold whose spec remote's
mainis one commit (<tip>) past the pin, with fixed commit dates so every variant sees the same object ids. Each scenario runs main 03dc729's bootstrap.py (byte-identical to 7a8b981's), b247dec's and head 757a440's, with--skip-validators, under the sameghstub. Every run exits 0.index.lockkept over two runsbranch main moved back <tip> -> <pin>, ... and git refused to check it out:. Run 2:on main at <pin> (branch tip == pin), over a leg still detachedbranch main is at the pin <pin>, and git refused to check it out:+ git's lines / detached,mainat<pin>HEAD.lockon main at <pin>, leg detachedbranch main is at the pin <pin>, and git refused to check it out:+unable to update HEADmain== pin, detached at the pin, a staleindex.lockon main at <pin> (branch tip == pin), leg detachedbranch main is at the pin <pin>, and git refused to check it out:+ git's lines / detachedmain== pin, HEAD onfeatat<tip>, a local edit toREADME.md, which<tip>also changeson main at <pin>, HEAD still onfeatbranch main is at the pin <pin>, and git refused to check it out:+Your local changes ... would be overwritten by checkout/ onfeat, the edit keptpost-checkout hook failedand exits 1branch main moved back ..., and git refused to check it out:+ the hook's line, over a leg onmainchecked out, and then git said:+ the hook's line / onmainat<pin>my spec(hand-written manifest)... `git -C my spec merge --ff-only origin/main` ..., which a shell splits into-C my... `git -C 'my spec' merge --ff-only origin/main` .../ onmainat<pin>Of the 30 scenarios, 21 are byte-identical in output and state between b247dec and 757a440. In three more (another worktree, a rebase stopped at
break, a bisect), only the scratch path inside git's own message differs. The other six are the rows above. The local-branch upstream (branch.main.remoteof.) is refused, byte-identical to main, on all three.Tests
tests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py, 23 tests. The module scaffolds into its own bare repositories on disk, because each test pushes a commit to the spec remote, to a branch of its own. The fresh-clone tests have a second scaffold of their own, whose spec remote'smainhas moved past the pin. Each of those tests makes its owngit clone --recurse-submodulesof it. Everything is git and Python, with no bash and nogh.merge.autostash=trueand the post-checkout hook'score.hooksPathgo in throughGIT_CONFIG_COUNT/GIT_CONFIG_KEY_<n>/GIT_CONFIG_VALUE_<n>, APPENDED to what the environment holds, because the Windows job already sets two entries. Nevergit config. The hook is a shebang script, which Git for Windows runs through its ownsh, astests/test_bump_leg_rollback.py's hook already does on all three OSes. Nothing is skipped on any OS.First round (8):
bump-leg.py, bootstrap. The leg ends onmainat the new pin, the pin is unmoved and the root is clean;mainbehind the pin is fast-forwarded, with its files;mainchecked out in another worktree of the leg is not reset;First fix round (11):
main, run plain and withmerge.autostash=true: refused,mainunmoved,git stash listempty, nothing unmerged, the edit as it was (2);branch -fmoved the branch says the branch moved, prints no line of spaces, and the next run checks it out;mainAT the pin, the pin is unmoved, the root and the leg are clean,origin/mainand the upstream are kept, and the printedgit -C spec merge --ff-only origin/mainbringsmainto the remote's tip;mainmoves back and the edit is kept;mainhas a commit of its own: refused, byte-identical to main, nothing moved;main, and amainthat does not contain the pin (4).Second fix round (4 new tests, 1 new case, 2 extended):
index.lockfor a second run, which saysbranch main is at the pin <new>, and git refused to check it out:and never[spec] spec: on main at; once the lock is gone, the next run checksmainout;main== pin, the leg detached there, a staleindex.lock: git's refusal, noon main at, nothing moves; once the lock is gone, the next run checksmainout;checked out, and then git said:and the hook's line, norefused, the leg onmainat the pin;my spec: the printed command isgit -C 'my spec' merge --ff-only origin/main, and split as a POSIX shell splits it, it runs and bringsmainto the remote's tip;'origin/tb\u2028x'.Results:
(The 19-test module of the first fix round gave 12 failed and 7 passed on main 7a8b981, 5 failed and 14 passed on e5d7a3a, and 19 passed on b247dec.)
Each test bites. I ran the 19-test module against eleven deliberate breaks of b247dec; each break fails exactly the tests in its row:
checkout -Binstead ofbranch -f+checkoutrefs/remotes/origin/<branch>instead of the configured upstreammainmaindoes not contain the pinmerge.autostashleft as configuredcheckout -f -BAnd the 23-test module against four deliberate breaks of head 757a440:
online printedrefs/remotes/accepted (verification finding 6's mutant)Targeted runs on head 757a440 (Linux, git 2.43, Python 3.12):
test_bootstrap_after_bump.py test_bootstrap_spelling.py test_doctor_legs_members_next.py test_repo_hygiene.py test_cli_reference.py test_agents_md_codes.py test_git_output_decoding.py test_stdout_encoding.py: 523 passed, 1 skipped. The skip istest_stdout_encoding.py:286, "the default this is about is Windows' own".test_scaffold_e2e.py test_family.py test_tracking_branch_ref.py test_scaffold_mount_ignored.py test_bump_leg.py: 392 passed, 1 skipped. The skip is an existing disk-case skip intest_bump_leg.py.Composes with
Trial merges (
git merge-tree --write-tree) against head 757a440:origin/main03dc729fix/refusal-default-remediation), #493, #491, #484, #474, #467, #466, #465, #384, #382, #376, #374, #373fix/doctor-mid-merge-not-compliantdocs/handbook.html, which it has with main alone. Nothing in this PR's filesfix/bootstrap-print-name-escaped(#456, already merged)bootstrap.py, because this PR is built on its squash, ec4a7a0. Clean against main aloneNo other
origin/fix/*branch touchestemplates/assembly-root/scripts/bootstrap.pyortests/test_bootstrap_after_bump.py.Left out
shape-doctor.py's docstrings (submodule_update_next,check_legs) and the tests' still say bootstrap "never moves an existing branch whose tip is not the pin". Other open pull requests touchshape-doctor.py, so they are left for a checklist item. The doctor's NEXT still cures every case they describe, so no printed line is wrong.git submodule update), bootstrap still prints the old refusal, includingThe checkout stays at the pin.mainwith no commit of its own that does not contain the pin (the remote'smaindiverged from it) keeps the refusal. Moving it would lose nothing either, but this PR moves a branch back only along the pin's own line.main, the leg went back to the pin, and someone then force-pushed the remote'smainto drop that commit. A move-back before the next fetch leaves the commit only in the reflog once that fetch runs. It needs a force-push that drops commits from the leg's shared branch, which a protectedmainrefuses.Closes #475
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by Sourcery
Keep assembly legs safely attached to their tracking branches at the authoritative pin without overwriting user work.
New Features:
Bug Fixes:
Enhancements:
Tests: