Repository navigation
fix(web): editing a queued message keeps its thread mention chips #30889
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+108
−12
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
549a807
test(web): queued message edit keeps thread mention records
juliusmarminge a2b706e
fix(web): editing a queued message keeps its thread mention chips
juliusmarminge a3e4564
fix(web): queued edits seed only referenced mentions and drop the dra…
juliusmarminge f9c65b6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/issue-30850
juliusmarminge 348402f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/issue-30850
juliusmarminge e83f8db
test(web): cover unreferenced queued edit records in the open-edit case
juliusmarminge 184266d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/issue-30850
juliusmarminge 9b92afd
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/issue-30850
juliusmarminge da00c26
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/issue-30850
juliusmarminge c097c91
Merge branch 'main' into fix/issue-30850
juliusmarminge 40c641a
Merge branch 'main' into fix/issue-30850
juliusmarminge File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This repeats the existing kept-edit recovery case. Could you add the thread context to that case and retain its cleanup assertion instead of adding another
it?Posted via Macroscope — Test Signal