[ptr727]

Summary

Review on the promotion pull request #1234 flagged a stated count in RegressionTests/README.md "Comparing two runs": "for two further checks". A count of a list is a second copy that nothing keeps in sync with the list. So the sentence refers to the checks below it instead of counting them.

Test plan

• prose_lint.py --diff origin/develop, markdownlint, and cspell: clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[ptr727]

A recorded local strict-review pass covers head 9ac12d5aa0adcc809f4b3c8dfacf58ff79300dad, the content this pull request carries at that commit against develop, and it recorded 0 findings.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Tip of the day

💡 Did you know, you can see how risky a PR is at a glance with blast radius labels

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

[qodo-free-for-open-source-projects]

PR Summary by Qodo

Remove Hard-Coded Check Count from Regression Test README

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

AI Description

• Replace the stated count of log checks with a reference to the list below.
• Keep the introduction accurate if checks are added or removed.

High-Level Assessment

Referring to the list directly is the simplest way to avoid maintaining a separate count; no architectural alternative is warranted.

Files changed (1) +1 / -1

Documentation (1) +1 / -1

README.mdRefer to log checks without stating their count +1/-1

Refer to log checks without stating their count

• The comparison instructions now point to the checks listed below instead of saying there are two. This prevents the introduction from becoming inaccurate if the list changes.

RegressionTests/README.md

[Copilot]

🟢 Approval recommended

No active review issues remain, and the documentation change is narrowly scoped to removing a potentially drifting hard-coded count while leaving the referenced checks unchanged.

No open issues 🎉

What changed in this PR

This small documentation PR removes a hard-coded count from RegressionTests/README.md. The "Comparing two runs" section said "for two further checks", but that count can drift from the list under it. The sentence now points to "the further checks below", so the list is the only place that describes the checks.

Changes:

• Replaces "for two further checks:" with "for the further checks below:" in the "Comparing two runs" section.
• Leaves the two checks below it (output tracks and normalized log lines) unchanged.

File	Description
RegressionTests/​README.md	Removes the stated count of checks so the sentence refers to the list below instead of duplicating it.

_{Review effort: Lite}

[ptr727]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

Action not completed

Pull request is closed.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.