Repository navigation
Conversation
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Parallelize AST -> HIR lowering
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (79a91eb): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read:Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf. Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @bors rollup=never rustc-perf Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 1.2%, secondary 0.4%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 11.0%, secondary 2.7%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeResults (primary -0.1%, secondary -0.3%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Bootstrap: 489.575s -> 491.192s (0.33%) |
|
Pretty nice results! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Parallelization of AST -> HIR lowering broke deterministic encoding of syntax contexts 🤣 (#161450). |
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Parallelize AST -> HIR lowering
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (335f660): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf. Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @bors rollup=never rustc-perf Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -3.1%, secondary -2.7%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 14.6%, secondary -2.7%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeResults (primary -0.0%, secondary -0.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Bootstrap: 489.84s -> 488.516s (-0.27%) |
Note that we have to gather the parent benchmark results first, so it only makes sense to do a perf. run here for the new benchmark configurations after the next PR merges into |
|
@bors try cancel |
|
Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows: Hint: if you want to run another try build, you do not need to manually cancel the previous one. Just run |
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Parallelize AST -> HIR lowering
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (5e0645b): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up. Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @bors rollup=iffy rustc-perf Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 0.9%, secondary 0.7%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 3.2%, secondary -0.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 488.496s -> 491.134s (0.54%) |
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Parallelize AST -> HIR lowering
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (02b947e): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read:Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up. Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @bors rollup=iffy rustc-perf Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 1.5%, secondary 0.0%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 4.1%, secondary -0.7%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 485.551s -> 488.779s (0.66%) |
View all comments
Parallelize AST -> HIR lowering.
r? @petrochenkov