Owner question: update - a machine never quiet in its update hours: keep waiting or force after N days? #147

Recommendation: keep waiting and show it as "behind".

Context: update design for the fork. Keep the fork's updater (fork #5) until upstream's own lands, then take upstream's whole and keep three small add-ons: default stays OFF (fork #41, pinned by a test), an "update only between these hours" setting, and the existing quiet command. 7 PRs (+1 conditional).

The question: a machine is never quiet during its update hours. What then?

• Keep waiting (recommended): it shows as "behind" and you update it by hand when it suits you; running agents are never stopped.
• Update anyway after N days: it stays current, but running agents on that machine are stopped once.

Reply "keep waiting" or "after N days".

🤖 Generated with Claude Code