Skip to content

Multiple library products and union types #14

Description

@MaxDesiatov

Playing with the library a bit more, I think it would be great to split it into separate targets and products, if possible. As an example, people who don't need WebGL don't need to build WebGL wrappers, but I think it still makes sense to provide them.

IDK if WebIDL specifies dependencies between their "modules", so maybe we'd need to hardcode those on our side for things to work?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions