Skip to content

[BUG] topologies with virtual DAI don't work with older kernel #10561

Description

@kv2019i

Describe the bug
Concern raised in #10546 (comment)

Filing a bug as I think we have virtual DAIs used in previous PRs as well, so let's track the dependencies in this bug.

To Reproduce

Reproduction Rate

Expected behavior
New releases of topology files need to work with older versions of kernel (exception new platforms that anyways need a new kernel).

Impact

Environment

Activity

  1. added
    bugSomething isn't working as expected
    P1Blocker bugs or important features
    on Feb 20, 2026
  2. kv2019i commented on Feb 20, 2026

    @kv2019i
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Marking as P1 to ensure this is solved before next sof-bin release.

  3. kv2019i commented on Feb 20, 2026

    @kv2019i
    CollaboratorAuthor

    @bardliao can you take a look at first. Is this just the one commit (of one PR)?

  4. ujfalusi commented on Feb 20, 2026

    @ujfalusi
    Contributor

    I think we need to revert [1] this for production, it will break fucntion topologies on pre 7.0, NVL is supposed to be usable w/ 6.19..
    Then we need to figure out what to do...

    [1] #10560

  5. changed the title [-][BUG] topologies with virtual DIA don't work with older kernsl[/-] [+][BUG] topologies with virtual DAI don't work with older kernel[/+] on Feb 20, 2026
  6. lgirdwood commented on Feb 23, 2026

    @lgirdwood
    Member

    @bardliao revert is merged, we have more time for a fix now.

  7. bardliao commented on Feb 23, 2026

    @bardliao
    Collaborator

    Thanks @kv2019i @ujfalusi for raising the issue. We probably need a kernel change to select the function topology with echo reference when the virtual DAI link is created.

  8. added
    P2Critical bugs or normal features
    and removed
    P1Blocker bugs or important features
    on Feb 24, 2026
  9. kv2019i commented on Feb 24, 2026

    @kv2019i
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Revert merged so lowering to P2

  10. bardliao commented on Feb 25, 2026

    @bardliao
    Collaborator

    New PR on #10573

  11. abonislawski commented on Mar 10, 2026

    @abonislawski
    Member

    Reverted, can be closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

P2Critical bugs or normal featuresbugSomething isn't working as expectedtopologyTopology issues

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions