You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As you know, I maintain a Neovim plugin for .NET development. The plugin currently downloads and bundles netcoredbg binaries so users get an OOTB debugging experience.
I’ve recently opened several PRs to netcoredbg for improvements such as primary constructor inspection, column breakpoints, and related debugger features. I noticed you’ve pulled some of those commits into this repo as well, which is great to see.
I’m really glad to see active development happening here. As a downstream maintainer, I’ve found the upstream netcoredbg feedback and release cycle a bit slow, which makes it harder to ship debugger improvements to users. Seeing this fork move more actively is encouraging, and I’d love to contribute more if that would be helpful.
Because upstream releases can take a while, I wanted to ask whether you’d be comfortable with me also supporting or bundling dncdbg in my plugin. This would give me a much faster feedback loop and let users try these debugger improvements sooner. In return, it could also bring more users, bug reports, feature requests, and potential contributors to your fork.
I’d also love to contribute more directly here if that would be helpful. If issues come up that are related to areas I’ve worked on, or areas where you think I could help, feel free to tag me. I’d be happy to help with debugging, testing, reviewing issues, opening PRs, or generally being more involved in development so the burden does not fall entirely on you.
If you’re open to this, I’d like to align on how it should work:
Should future PRs from me target this repo, upstream netcoredbg, or both?
Where would you prefer users to report issues: this repo, upstream netcoredbg, or my plugin repo if the source is unclear?
Would you be okay with me documenting dncdbg as an experimental and faster-moving debugger?
Would you be comfortable tagging me in relevant issues or discussions where I might be able to contribute?
No pressure either way. I wanted to ask before exposing more users to the fork, and to make sure that if I do, it is useful for the project rather than creating extra maintenance work for you.
If you could provide more testers for dncdbg, that would be awesome!
Should future PRs from me target this repo, upstream netcoredbg, or both?
As you might have noticed, I have temporarily disabled PRs in dncdbg. I am currently planning a major code rebase and architecture changes that will dramatically alter the codebase. Because of this, I am only porting "simple" changes from netcoredbg for now to keep the current codebase footprint small and simplify the upcoming rebase.
Please submit your PRs to netcoredbg upstream. I monitor that repository closely and will port your changes to dncdbg at the right time.
Where would you prefer users to report issues: this repo, upstream netcoredbg, or my plugin repo if the source is unclear?
If a bug or issue is strictly related to dncdbg, please open it in the dncdbg repo. If it affects netcoredbg or both projects, please file it in the netcoredbg repo. I check both repositories anyway!
Would you be okay with me documenting dncdbg as an experimental and faster-moving debugger?
Sure, absolutely.
Would you be comfortable tagging me in relevant issues or discussions where I might be able to contribute?
Sure! By the way, you are already highly involved and helping a lot! :-)
Activity
viewizard commentedon Jun 8, 2026
Hi,
If you could provide more testers for
dncdbg, that would be awesome!As you might have noticed, I have temporarily disabled PRs in
dncdbg. I am currently planning a major code rebase and architecture changes that will dramatically alter the codebase. Because of this, I am only porting "simple" changes fromnetcoredbgfor now to keep the current codebase footprint small and simplify the upcoming rebase.Please submit your PRs to
netcoredbgupstream. I monitor that repository closely and will port your changes todncdbgat the right time.If a bug or issue is strictly related to
dncdbg, please open it in thedncdbgrepo. If it affectsnetcoredbgor both projects, please file it in thenetcoredbgrepo. I check both repositories anyway!Sure, absolutely.
Sure! By the way, you are already highly involved and helping a lot! :-)