Skip to content

vocab: append-only field ordering - #361

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ccr-0455e606-wmtsor
Oct 15, 2026
Merged

AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ccr-0455e606-wmtsor

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

@AdaWorldAPI AdaWorldAPI commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds append-only field ordering (after_edges, Attribute::appended, Class::field_basis). Its concept and attribute mints are withdrawn in a follow-up.


Generated by Claude Code

A field minted after a class's edges were fixed is flagged `after_edges`
and projected after them, so positions already pinned by a consumer's
FieldMask (diagnosis: patient=10, encounter=11) do not move.
`Class::field_basis` spells that order on the vocabulary side and a test
checks it equals the class view's projection for every promoted class.

Mints, each a column of a harvested MedCare screen:
- diagnosis: recorded_on
- lab_value: recorded_at, order_id
- treatment: ended_at, session_count
- examination: form_kind, note
- document: name, uploaded_at, keywords, note
- specialist_referral (0x090D, Facharztüberweisung): patient and
  referred_to edges; start_date, end_date, status, note

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2026 06:21
@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI merged commit 527ff1a into main Oct 15, 2026
4 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-15T06:29:51.836890Z 8b555e8 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

AdaWorldAPI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2026
Removes the concept 0x090D and the attribute mints added in #361. A
consumer's codebook content does not belong in OGAR; OGAR keeps the
generic part: `AttributeOptions::after_edges`, `Attribute::appended` and
`Class::field_basis`, plus a test that an appended attribute lands after
the edges and that `field_basis` matches the class view's order for every
class.

0x090D is not reused.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg
@AdaWorldAPI AdaWorldAPI changed the title vocab: append-only field mints and specialist_referral (0x090D) vocab: append-only field ordering Oct 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants