Repository navigation
Extend the commons with revisable collaboration principles - #43
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 8, 2026
Draft
Draft
3 of 8 tasks
raelovejoy
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 24, 2026 06:32
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Root Sequence needs a shared place to discuss how people can contribute, challenge decisions, and leave or develop alternatives while preserving privacy and local project authority.
This draft extends
commons/README.mdwith proposed collaboration principles. It keeps criticism distinct from misconduct, repair voluntary, and actual powers limited and reviewable. It asks who bears maintenance and what evidence would prompt changing or abandoning a practice. The root README points to this source; the ecosystem map and Idea Trail replace the earlier unqualified role-power slogan with limited, explicit, reviewable powers.Review refresh, October 23, 2026 (Pacific): incorporated current main
7c7231b9edc9b1d922fbbfd4a050f924b3823a1c, including merged #41. Added explicit AI-assisted/author-review-pending status and clarified that publishing this proposal leaves existing rules and roles in place; adopting a rule needs an explicit project-local decision. Corrected a sentence that could imply the unmerged organization companion was already established. Shortened the README pointer in the reviewed natural style. The substantive proposed principles otherwise remain unchanged.Validation: complete four-file diff and source-context review; compared with current root contribution guidance and published organization contribution/stewardship documents; canonical method/seed routes checked; current privacy labels, reviewed introduction/reuse wording, and #41 additions preserved. All 238 reader-document files and scoped whitespace checks pass. The Idea Trail graph/index check and all 11 site checks also pass on the exact current #43 commit. These checks do not validate governance outcomes or complete the author's content decision.
Public companions remain drafts pending publication of this source and their own local review: .github #9, Being Human(e) #6, UCF #9, Discussions #8, and Wiki #13. The new main anchor becomes available only after this PR is published. Private work retains its access boundary.
Publishing this text would publish a proposal for discussion. No institution, governing body, research protocol, role assignment, private-source release, or policy adoption is established. No merge or deployment was performed by the agent.