Draft coercion, care, and the Extended Hand research inquiry

research/README.md

@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ This directory holds bounded research inquiries and versioned papers that synthe
 
 ## Cross-cutting related work
 
+- [Coercion, Care, and the Extended Hand](coercion-care-and-extended-hand/README.md) — **AI-assisted review draft; author and historical review pending**. Distinguishes documented militia, patrol, disarmament, Reconstruction, and Indigenous histories from disputed origin claims; proposes a consent/care principle and unexecuted institutional comparisons. Creative motifs are labeled separately.
 - [Agency under stress](agency-under-stress.md) — **AI-assisted working synthesis; author review pending; not clinical guidance or an interrogation manual**. Connects controllability, coercion, decentering, psychosocial support, recovery, and human-facing system design while preserving evidence limits.
 - [Adaptive continuity / dynamic coherence — intellectual lineage and prior art](dynamic-coherence-lineage.md) — **targeted related-work note; not a novelty finding or systematic review**. Traces state/parameter change, ultrastability, requisite variety, double-loop learning, resilience engineering, sustained adaptability, adaptive management/governance, path dependence, and second-order cybernetics; also records prior uses of the phrase “dynamic coherence.”
 - [Reading Trails](reading-trails/README.md) — **curated brain-food maps**, separate from claim-level bibliographies: archives, societies, courses, old magazines, reading lists, practitioner hubs, and other places worth wandering. The first trail covers [systems, cybernetics, complexity, and adaptive systems](reading-trails/systems-cybernetics-complexity.md).

research/coercion-care-and-extended-hand/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# Coercion, Care, and the Extended Hand
+
+**Document role:** Bounded historical synthesis and research proposal.<br>
+**Status:** REVIEW DRAFT / AI-assisted / author review pending, 2026-10-26.<br>
+**Canonical scope:** This inquiry connects the contested history of armed liberty and coercive institutions to questions about care, autonomy, political organization, and distributed intelligence. It does not replace the existing commons or systems research.<br>
+**Evidence:** Selected historical documents and attributed scholarship; interpretive connections, a provisional normative principle, unexecuted tests, and creative motifs are labeled separately.
+
+**Idea Trails:** Stewardship, Authority & Power; Mutual Aid, Reciprocity & Need; Privacy vs. Coordination; Intelligence, Automation & Legitimate Authority.<br>
+**Trail role:** research
+<!-- idea-trails: stewardship-authority, mutual-aid-need, privacy-coordination, intelligence-authority -->
+<!-- trail-role: research -->
+
+> An offered hand must be possible to refuse.
+
+## Read the inquiry
+
+1. [Synthesis](synthesis.md): historical distinctions, Root Sequence connections, and the provisional **Extended Hand Principle**.
+2. [Claim and uncertainty ledger](claims.md): what is supported, debated, proposed, or still missing.
+3. [Sources and inspection record](sources.md): exact locators and limits of this source pass.
+4. [Simulation proposals](simulation-proposals.md): falsifiable comparisons for hierarchy, security, scarcity, and unequal access; no runs or findings.
+5. [Creative motifs](creative.md): two original astronaut illustrations, with an extended hand, an eye-shaped web, and an infinity loop. The jokes are not evidence.
+
+## Existing homes retained
+
+| Existing work | What it continues to own | This inquiry adds |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| [Intelligence Commons](../intelligence-without-omniscience/intelligence-commons.md) and [AI Commons](../intelligence-without-omniscience/ai-commons.md) | Shared capabilities, AI-service institutions, technical safety distinctions, and transition research | A historically grounded coercion/care question and additional proposed comparisons; no second commons charter |
+| [Coherence Is a Systems Property](../papers/coherent-systems/README.md) | Its working argument, claims ledger, and systems synthesis | A candidate countercase: a coordinated institution can efficiently enforce domination; this note does not revise the paper or validate its framework |
+| [Agency under stress](../agency-under-stress.md) | The sourced stress, controllability, coercion, and recovery synthesis | Questions about institutionally imposed dependence and the practical ability to refuse |
+| [Human(e) Design Review](../../commons/humane-design-review.md) | Existing practical review questions about agency, privacy, maintenance, and power | A memorable provisional formulation, with hard cases; no claim of a new ethical discovery |
+| [Historical Contingency](../../analysis/historical-contingency.md) | The broader argument against inevitable institutional futures | A bounded historical example with competing explanations |
+| [Knowledge, institutional power, and stewardship — existing draft](https://github.com/Root-Sequence/root-sequence/blob/8590f16c6bf8ea2fd010f9fe27be9b53006823a9/research/knowledge-power-and-stewardship.md) | Research-use, contributor-agency, and publication questions in draft PR #50 | A separate historical/care inquiry; no new licensing terms or adoption of that draft's governance proposal |
+| Coherent World | Project-owned simulation design and any future execution or adoption | Public research proposals it may transform, narrow, or reject; private specifications and story canon are not reproduced here |
+
+## Provenance and review
+
+The initiating conversation was titled *Second Amendment Origins*. The retrieved reference exposed the user's final messages about an eye/web image, continuing the inquiry, and two astronaut memes. Earlier assistant passages were unresolved content references; their arguments and sources could not be recovered. An attached SVG was inspected as a small network motif. This draft follows the user's explicit integration request, not an asserted reconstruction of the missing conversation. The original attachment and private dialogue are not copied into the public candidate.
+
+Rae supplied the inquiry, the provisional principle's name and requested dimensions, the political questions, creative direction, and the instruction to draft without publishing. Codex, based on GPT-6 (exact variant/settings unavailable), performed repository inspection, source discovery and selected-passages checking, synthesis, criticism, scenario design, original vector drawing, and local integration. The wording and additional hypotheses are substantive AI contributions; they do not establish Rae's endorsement.
+
+**No historical specialist review, systematic literature review, participant study, simulation run, independent validation, project adoption, or publication approval beyond GitHub draft sharing is recorded.** Source inspection and structural validation are separate from those decisions. Retire or rename the principle if it adds no useful distinction to existing consent, autonomy, care, and accountability work.
+
+Back to [Research](../README.md) and the [research method](../method.md).
+
+2026-10-26 sharing checkpoint: Rae explicitly authorized adding this prepared integration to GitHub. This authorizes the review branch and draft PR; substantive endorsement, a reviewed release, merge, and deployment remain separate.