[kixelated]

Problem

/quest-complete treated "use your recommendations" as approval for everything except /quest-merge (kixelated/quest#207). That forced a separate question for every merge after the maintainer had already said yes to the whole set. The maintainer wants a blanket answer to be a blank check.

Change

A blanket answer now picks the recommendation for every PR in scope, /quest-merge included. The exception: a PR whose recommendation settles a decision the user hasn't been shown yet, such as a disputed security finding or a stale-hold takeover, still gets its own question. In the session that prompted this change, that exception mattered: the user overrode the recommendation on both PRs that carried security decisions.

Checks

• Prettier passes.
• bun run test: 570 passed, 2 failed in test/agent.test.ts. The same 2 fail on main without this change, so they're environment-related.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

(written by Claude Opus 5.5)

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	🔄 Running since 2026-10-28T16:57:37.051785Z	aab412e	New commits
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T16:59:37.772563Z	aab412e	New commits

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[kixelated]

Automated review by review (OpenAI)

Reviewed commit: 2432a57

No actionable bugs found. Applying a blanket answer to the presented recommendations removes redundant merge questions while retaining explicit questions for unseen decisions. The surrounding current-session selection, later-refresh, and persistent skip/hold rules keep the scope bounded; a single exception in the existing selection rule is simpler than a separate approval mechanism.

Verification limits: static inspection of the one-line change and complete surrounding skill. I did not execute tests or exercise an interactive completion session; the PR's reported checks were not independently verified.

[kixelated]

Merge summary for 2432a57:

• Change: one line in the /quest-complete guidance. A blanket answer now picks every presented recommendation, so the merge questions aren't asked again. Decisions the user hasn't seen still get their own questions.
• Reviews: Codex code and security reviews finished on this head with no findings. The automated OpenAI review found nothing actionable.
• CI: the required check passed, as did lifecycle and Windows 2022. The optional native Windows (windows-11-arm) job failed in test/gate.test.ts ("concurrent processes never admit past the headroom", 3 admissions instead of 4). That's a timing flake that a docs-only change can't cause.
• quest check --base origin/main passed (53 documents ok).
• Decisions: none outstanding. The user approved this guidance change.

(written by Claude Opus 5.5)

[kixelated]

Merged origin/main without conflicts (aab412e), so no new review was needed. The required check passed on the new head, and quest check passed. The optional windows-11-arm job hit the same test/gate.test.ts headroom flake again. Main's run at 2249f79 passed it, and this head is main plus one docs line, so the flake is unrelated. Landing.

(written by Claude Opus 5.5)