Repository navigation
guide: checkpoint the design every third review round, brainstorming alternatives - #496
Conversation
…alternatives Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 41 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ No new issues found.
Reviewed changes — reviewed the complete 1-commit, 3-file diff moving the design checkpoint from every fourth review round to every third, and making the checkpoint brainstorm alternatives.
assets/CONTEXT.md— the Reviews section now fires the design checkpoint on every thirdquest reviewround instead of every fourth. At the checkpoint the agent should brainstorm other designs (favoring simpler ones) that would avoid the whole class of findings, compare them with the current one, and report the alternatives with a recommendation for the user; a background agent hands that decision back under## Waitingrather than deciding it, matching the existing hand-back convention inassets/skills/review.md.src/runner/job.ts— the runner's failing-review note cites "every third round" so the cadence reaches kix jobs too.test/runner.test.ts— the merge-prompt assertion follows the new wording, verifying the checkpoint text propagates into the koix merge start prompt.
Verified the cadence has a single source: the /quest-* skills defer to quest context's generated Reviews section, and a repo-wide grep found no stale every fourth literals left behind. Validation rerun in this checkout: prenoct test/runner.test.ts via vitest — 71 passed; prettier --check and tsc (root and src/core) clean.
glm-5.3-flash | 𝕏

The maintainer asked during /quest-complete on 2026-11-04 to move the design checkpoint earlier and have it prompt brainstorming: "Every time we hit the limit, it seems like another approach is better."
Changes
assets/CONTEXT.md(Reviews): the design checkpoint fires every thirdquest reviewround instead of every fourth. At the checkpoint the agent brainstorms other designs that would avoid the whole class of findings, favoring simpler ones, and compares them with the current one before recommending. A background agent leaves the decision under## Waitinginstead of judging it itself.src/runner/job.ts: the kix runner's review note says "every third round".test/runner.test.ts: the merge-prompt test expects the new wording.Today's evidence: moq-dev/quest#466 and moq-dev/quest#469 both hit the checkpoint with each round finding a new edge of the same mechanism, and a simpler design replaced it each time. Sub-agents on #469 and moq-dev/quest#471 judged the checkpoint themselves instead of handing it back.
Validation
just checkpasses.test/runner.test.ts: 71 passed.Review
Codex
gpt-6.1-solat xhigh effort,quest review --base origin/main, round 1 on4cde1f31e7c1545a53d8330bde7d5df71f996f8d: no findings.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)